文化塑造了自发的大脑动力学——中国和加拿大受试者的共同和特殊神经特征。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2023.2278199
Jiawei Xu, Soren Wainio-Theberge, Annemarie Wolff, Pengmin Qin, Yihui Zhang, Xuan She, Yingying Wang, Angelika Wolman, David Smith, Julia Ignaszewski, Joelle Choueiry, Verner Knott, Andrea Scalabrini, Georg Northoff
{"title":"文化塑造了自发的大脑动力学——中国和加拿大受试者的共同和特殊神经特征。","authors":"Jiawei Xu, Soren Wainio-Theberge, Annemarie Wolff, Pengmin Qin, Yihui Zhang, Xuan She, Yingying Wang, Angelika Wolman, David Smith, Julia Ignaszewski, Joelle Choueiry, Verner Knott, Andrea Scalabrini, Georg Northoff","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2023.2278199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental factors, such as culture, are known to shape individual variation in brain activity including spontaneous activity, but less is known about their population-level effects. Eastern and Western cultures differ strongly in their cultural norms about relationships between individuals. For example, the collectivism, interdependence and tightness of Eastern cultures relative to the individualism, independence and looseness of Western cultures, promote interpersonal connectedness and coordination. Do such cultural contexts therefore influence the group-level variability of their cultural members' spontaneous brain activity? Using novel methods adapted from studies of inter-subject neural synchrony, we compare the group-level variability of resting state EEG dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. We observe that Chinese subjects show significantly higher inter-subject correlation and lower inter-subject distance in their EEG power spectra than Canadian subjects, as well as lower variability in theta power and alpha peak frequency. We demonstrate, for the first time, different relationships among subjects' resting state brain dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. These results point to more idiosyncratic neural dynamics among Canadian participants, compared with more shared neural features in Chinese participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"312-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culture shapes spontaneous brain dynamics - Shared versus idiosyncratic neural features among Chinese versus Canadian subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Xu, Soren Wainio-Theberge, Annemarie Wolff, Pengmin Qin, Yihui Zhang, Xuan She, Yingying Wang, Angelika Wolman, David Smith, Julia Ignaszewski, Joelle Choueiry, Verner Knott, Andrea Scalabrini, Georg Northoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17470919.2023.2278199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Environmental factors, such as culture, are known to shape individual variation in brain activity including spontaneous activity, but less is known about their population-level effects. Eastern and Western cultures differ strongly in their cultural norms about relationships between individuals. For example, the collectivism, interdependence and tightness of Eastern cultures relative to the individualism, independence and looseness of Western cultures, promote interpersonal connectedness and coordination. Do such cultural contexts therefore influence the group-level variability of their cultural members' spontaneous brain activity? Using novel methods adapted from studies of inter-subject neural synchrony, we compare the group-level variability of resting state EEG dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. We observe that Chinese subjects show significantly higher inter-subject correlation and lower inter-subject distance in their EEG power spectra than Canadian subjects, as well as lower variability in theta power and alpha peak frequency. We demonstrate, for the first time, different relationships among subjects' resting state brain dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. These results point to more idiosyncratic neural dynamics among Canadian participants, compared with more shared neural features in Chinese participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"312-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2023.2278199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2023.2278199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,文化等环境因素会影响包括自发活动在内的大脑活动的个体变化,但对其群体水平的影响知之甚少。东西方文化在关于个体关系的文化规范上存在很大差异。例如,相对于西方文化的个人主义、独立性和松散性,东方文化的集体主义、相互依存性和紧密性促进了人际联系和协调。因此,这些文化背景是否会影响其文化成员自发大脑活动的群体水平可变性?使用改编自受试者间神经同步性研究的新方法,我们比较了中国和加拿大样本静息状态脑电图动力学的组水平变异性。我们观察到,与加拿大受试者相比,中国受试者在脑电图功率谱中表现出显著更高的受试者间相关性和更低的受试对象间距离,以及更低的θ功率和α峰值频率变异性。我们首次在中国和加拿大的样本中证明了受试者静息状态大脑动力学之间的不同关系。这些结果表明,与中国参与者的共同神经特征相比,加拿大参与者的神经动力学更为独特。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culture shapes spontaneous brain dynamics - Shared versus idiosyncratic neural features among Chinese versus Canadian subjects.

Environmental factors, such as culture, are known to shape individual variation in brain activity including spontaneous activity, but less is known about their population-level effects. Eastern and Western cultures differ strongly in their cultural norms about relationships between individuals. For example, the collectivism, interdependence and tightness of Eastern cultures relative to the individualism, independence and looseness of Western cultures, promote interpersonal connectedness and coordination. Do such cultural contexts therefore influence the group-level variability of their cultural members' spontaneous brain activity? Using novel methods adapted from studies of inter-subject neural synchrony, we compare the group-level variability of resting state EEG dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. We observe that Chinese subjects show significantly higher inter-subject correlation and lower inter-subject distance in their EEG power spectra than Canadian subjects, as well as lower variability in theta power and alpha peak frequency. We demonstrate, for the first time, different relationships among subjects' resting state brain dynamics in Chinese and Canadian samples. These results point to more idiosyncratic neural dynamics among Canadian participants, compared with more shared neural features in Chinese participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信