自我管理干预对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1111/wvn.12688
Rapin Polsook, Yupin Aungsuroch, Apichaya Thontham
{"title":"自我管理干预对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rapin Polsook, Yupin Aungsuroch, Apichaya Thontham","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes care helps to regulate blood sugar levels, reduce caregiver burden, improve health outcomes, and improve expense management. Despite these benefits, the efficacy of self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes care remains uncertain, with studies showing inconclusive results that are open to interpretation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the available data to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search method was restricted to the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Scopus from January 2012 to December 2022. SPSS version 28 was used for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, with 697 individuals with type 2 diabetes included. Six papers were designed as randomized control trials and one as a quasi-experimental study. Meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the self-management and control groups, with a standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) of -0.40, (95% confidence interval [-0.60 to -0.20]), p = .00.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes patients successfully reduced HbA1c. Self-management improves type 2 diabetes treatment by helping people stay healthy and adapt to their illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of self-management intervention among type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rapin Polsook, Yupin Aungsuroch, Apichaya Thontham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wvn.12688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes care helps to regulate blood sugar levels, reduce caregiver burden, improve health outcomes, and improve expense management. Despite these benefits, the efficacy of self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes care remains uncertain, with studies showing inconclusive results that are open to interpretation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the available data to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search method was restricted to the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Scopus from January 2012 to December 2022. SPSS version 28 was used for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, with 697 individuals with type 2 diabetes included. Six papers were designed as randomized control trials and one as a quasi-experimental study. Meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the self-management and control groups, with a standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) of -0.40, (95% confidence interval [-0.60 to -0.20]), p = .00.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes patients successfully reduced HbA1c. Self-management improves type 2 diabetes treatment by helping people stay healthy and adapt to their illnesses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"59-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12688\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在2型糖尿病护理中使用自我管理干预有助于调节血糖水平,减轻护理人员负担,改善健康状况,并改善费用管理。尽管有这些好处,但自我管理干预对2型糖尿病护理的疗效仍不确定,研究显示了不确定的结果,这些结果有待解释。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是检查现有数据,以确定2型糖尿病患者自我管理策略的有效性。方法:检索方法仅限于2012年1月至2022年12月的护理和相关健康文献累积索引、PubMed、ProQuest、Science Direct和Scopus。采用SPSS版本28进行荟萃分析。结果:7项研究符合资格标准,包括697名2型糖尿病患者。六篇论文被设计为随机对照试验,一篇为准实验研究。荟萃分析显示,自我管理组和对照组之间存在显著差异,标准化平均差(Cohen’s d)为-0.40,(95%置信区间为-0.60至-0.20]),p = .将证据与行动联系起来:这项荟萃分析表明,2型糖尿病患者的自我管理干预成功降低了HbA1c。自我管理通过帮助人们保持健康和适应疾病来改善2型糖尿病的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of self-management intervention among type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Using self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes care helps to regulate blood sugar levels, reduce caregiver burden, improve health outcomes, and improve expense management. Despite these benefits, the efficacy of self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes care remains uncertain, with studies showing inconclusive results that are open to interpretation.

Aims: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the available data to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: The search method was restricted to the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Scopus from January 2012 to December 2022. SPSS version 28 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results: Seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, with 697 individuals with type 2 diabetes included. Six papers were designed as randomized control trials and one as a quasi-experimental study. Meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the self-management and control groups, with a standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) of -0.40, (95% confidence interval [-0.60 to -0.20]), p = .00.

Linking evidence to action: This meta-analysis showed that self-management interventions in type 2 diabetes patients successfully reduced HbA1c. Self-management improves type 2 diabetes treatment by helping people stay healthy and adapt to their illnesses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信