主要骨科手术会议中的性别代表性:定量分析。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2023-11-02 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00067
Prushoth Vivekanantha, Andre Dao, Laurie Hiemstra, Maegan Shields, Andrea Chan, Veronica Wadey, Peter Ferguson, Ajay Shah
{"title":"主要骨科手术会议中的性别代表性:定量分析。","authors":"Prushoth Vivekanantha, Andre Dao, Laurie Hiemstra, Maegan Shields, Andrea Chan, Veronica Wadey, Peter Ferguson, Ajay Shah","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgery suffers from gender disparity, and annual conferences are visible opportunities to quantify gender representation within a field. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript was to investigate the prevalence of female speakers and moderators, and male-only panel sessions, at 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conference programs and details of faculty moderating or presenting in 10 Orthopaedic Surgery annual meetings in 2021 were retrieved. Conferences were selected with the aim of size and diversity in subspecialty topics and included American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, North American Spine Society, Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). Primary outcomes included percentage of female chairs and speakers and percentage of male-only panels, while secondary outcomes included number of publications, number of citations, and H-indexes of faculty. Further subgroup comparisons were performed between male-only panels and non-male-only panels and female members and male members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 207 included sessions, 121 (58.5%) were male-only panels and 150 (12.6%) of 1,188 faculty members were women. Conferences organized by the COA, ORS, and POSNA had higher percentages of female representation, while spine surgery and adult hip/knee reconstruction sessions had more than 70% male-only panels and fewer than 10% female members. There were no significant differences between male members and female members regarding years of practice; however, male members were more likely to hold the title of professor (p < 0.001). Male members and female members stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-indexes, moderated or participated in similar numbers of sessions, indicating an absence of selection bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high prevalence of male-only panels (58.5%) and an overall lack of female representation (12.6%) in 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings. Male members and female members from these conferences were found to have similar qualifications academically. Specific strategies such as the elimination of male-only panels, selecting diverse conference organizers, and forming conference equity, diversity, and inclusion committees can help achieve cultural change.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Representation in Major Orthopaedic Surgery Meetings: A Quantitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Prushoth Vivekanantha, Andre Dao, Laurie Hiemstra, Maegan Shields, Andrea Chan, Veronica Wadey, Peter Ferguson, Ajay Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgery suffers from gender disparity, and annual conferences are visible opportunities to quantify gender representation within a field. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript was to investigate the prevalence of female speakers and moderators, and male-only panel sessions, at 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conference programs and details of faculty moderating or presenting in 10 Orthopaedic Surgery annual meetings in 2021 were retrieved. Conferences were selected with the aim of size and diversity in subspecialty topics and included American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, North American Spine Society, Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). Primary outcomes included percentage of female chairs and speakers and percentage of male-only panels, while secondary outcomes included number of publications, number of citations, and H-indexes of faculty. Further subgroup comparisons were performed between male-only panels and non-male-only panels and female members and male members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 207 included sessions, 121 (58.5%) were male-only panels and 150 (12.6%) of 1,188 faculty members were women. Conferences organized by the COA, ORS, and POSNA had higher percentages of female representation, while spine surgery and adult hip/knee reconstruction sessions had more than 70% male-only panels and fewer than 10% female members. There were no significant differences between male members and female members regarding years of practice; however, male members were more likely to hold the title of professor (p < 0.001). Male members and female members stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-indexes, moderated or participated in similar numbers of sessions, indicating an absence of selection bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high prevalence of male-only panels (58.5%) and an overall lack of female representation (12.6%) in 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings. Male members and female members from these conferences were found to have similar qualifications academically. Specific strategies such as the elimination of male-only panels, selecting diverse conference organizers, and forming conference equity, diversity, and inclusion committees can help achieve cultural change.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科手术存在性别差异,年度会议是量化一个领域内性别代表性的明显机会。因此,这份手稿的目的是调查10次主要骨科手术会议上女性发言人和主持人以及仅限男性参加的小组会议的患病率。方法:检索2021年主持或出席10届骨科手术年会的会议计划和教员的详细信息。会议的选择以规模和亚专业主题的多样性为目标,包括美国髋关节和膝关节外科医生协会、美国手外科协会、美国骨科医师学会、美国运动医学骨科学会、加拿大骨科协会、欧洲国家骨科和创伤学会联合会、,北美脊柱学会、骨科研究学会(ORS)、骨科创伤协会和北美儿科骨科学会(POSNA)。主要结果包括女性主席和发言人的百分比以及仅限男性参加的小组的百分比,而次要结果包括出版物数量、引用次数和教师的H指数。在仅男性小组和非男性小组以及女性成员和男性成员之间进行了进一步的亚组比较。结果:在207个纳入的会议中,121个(58.5%)是仅限男性参加的小组,1188名教员中有150名(12.6%)是女性。由COA、ORS和POSNA组织的会议中,女性代表的比例更高,而脊柱手术和成人髋关节/膝关节重建会议中,70%以上的小组成员仅为男性,女性成员不到10%。男性成员和女性成员在执业年限方面没有显著差异;然而,男性成员更有可能拥有教授头衔(p<0.001)。男性成员和女性成员根据出版物、引文和H指数的四分位数进行分层,主持或参加了相似数量的会议,这表明没有选择偏见。结论:在10次主要骨科手术会议中,仅限男性参加的小组的患病率很高(58.5%),总体上缺乏女性代表(12.6%)。这些会议的男性成员和女性成员在学术上具有相似的资格。具体的战略,如取消仅限男性的小组,选择多样化的会议组织者,以及成立会议公平、多样性和包容性委员会,都有助于实现文化变革。证据级别:五级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Representation in Major Orthopaedic Surgery Meetings: A Quantitative Analysis.

Background: Orthopaedic surgery suffers from gender disparity, and annual conferences are visible opportunities to quantify gender representation within a field. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript was to investigate the prevalence of female speakers and moderators, and male-only panel sessions, at 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings.

Methods: Conference programs and details of faculty moderating or presenting in 10 Orthopaedic Surgery annual meetings in 2021 were retrieved. Conferences were selected with the aim of size and diversity in subspecialty topics and included American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, North American Spine Society, Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). Primary outcomes included percentage of female chairs and speakers and percentage of male-only panels, while secondary outcomes included number of publications, number of citations, and H-indexes of faculty. Further subgroup comparisons were performed between male-only panels and non-male-only panels and female members and male members.

Results: Of 207 included sessions, 121 (58.5%) were male-only panels and 150 (12.6%) of 1,188 faculty members were women. Conferences organized by the COA, ORS, and POSNA had higher percentages of female representation, while spine surgery and adult hip/knee reconstruction sessions had more than 70% male-only panels and fewer than 10% female members. There were no significant differences between male members and female members regarding years of practice; however, male members were more likely to hold the title of professor (p < 0.001). Male members and female members stratified by quartiles of publications, citations, and H-indexes, moderated or participated in similar numbers of sessions, indicating an absence of selection bias.

Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of male-only panels (58.5%) and an overall lack of female representation (12.6%) in 10 major Orthopaedic Surgery meetings. Male members and female members from these conferences were found to have similar qualifications academically. Specific strategies such as the elimination of male-only panels, selecting diverse conference organizers, and forming conference equity, diversity, and inclusion committees can help achieve cultural change.

Level of evidence: Level V.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信