{"title":"Sotrovimab在新冠肺炎实体器官移植受者中的应用:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Behnam Amani, Rouhollah Shabestan, Kourosh Rajabkhah, Bahman Amani","doi":"10.4285/kjt.23.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite widespread implementation of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) can remain particularly vulnerable to this disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in the treatment of SOTRs with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar to gather relevant evidence through July 25, 2023. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (ver. 3.0, Biostat) was employed for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies, involving a total of 1,569 patients, were included. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences between the patients administered sotrovimab and those treated with the standard of care. These differences were observed in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.67), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62), the need for supplemental oxygen therapy (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51), and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.70). However, no significant difference was observed between sotrovimab and other treatments regarding the rates of hospitalization or ICU admission (P>0.05). Regarding safety, sotrovimab was associated with a lower rate of adverse events compared to the absence of sotrovimab (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that sotrovimab may improve efficacy outcomes among SOTRs with COVID-19. Nevertheless, additional high-quality trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":33357,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sotrovimab in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Behnam Amani, Rouhollah Shabestan, Kourosh Rajabkhah, Bahman Amani\",\"doi\":\"10.4285/kjt.23.0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite widespread implementation of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) can remain particularly vulnerable to this disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in the treatment of SOTRs with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar to gather relevant evidence through July 25, 2023. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (ver. 3.0, Biostat) was employed for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies, involving a total of 1,569 patients, were included. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences between the patients administered sotrovimab and those treated with the standard of care. These differences were observed in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.67), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62), the need for supplemental oxygen therapy (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51), and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.70). However, no significant difference was observed between sotrovimab and other treatments regarding the rates of hospitalization or ICU admission (P>0.05). Regarding safety, sotrovimab was associated with a lower rate of adverse events compared to the absence of sotrovimab (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that sotrovimab may improve efficacy outcomes among SOTRs with COVID-19. Nevertheless, additional high-quality trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"277-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.23.0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.23.0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管广泛实施了2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)疫苗接种,但实体器官移植受者(SOTR)仍然特别容易感染这种疾病。本研究旨在调查索特罗维单抗治疗COVID-19 SOTR的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、medRxiv和Google Scholar,收集相关证据,直至2023年7月25日。使用偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。采用综合荟萃分析软件(3.0版,Biostat)进行数据分析。结果:纳入了10项研究,共涉及1569名患者。荟萃分析显示,接受索特罗维单抗治疗的患者与接受标准护理的患者之间存在显著差异。这些差异在死亡率(比值比[OR],0.15;95%置信区间[CI],0.03-0.67)、住院率(比值比0.35;95%可信区间0.21-0.57)、重症监护室(ICU)入院率(比值比0.16;95%可信指数0.04-0.62)、补充氧气治疗需求(比值比0.22;95%置信指数0.09-0.51)和机械通气需求(比值比0.09;95%CI,0.01-0.70)方面观察到。然而,sotrovimab与其他治疗在住院率或ICU入院率方面没有显著差异(P>0.05),与不使用索特罗维单抗相比,索特罗维单抗与较低的不良事件发生率相关(OR,0.15;95%CI,0.02-0.86)。结论:这些结果表明,索特罗维单抗可能改善新冠肺炎SOTR的疗效结果。然而,需要进行更多高质量的试验来证实这些发现。
Sotrovimab in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Despite widespread implementation of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) can remain particularly vulnerable to this disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in the treatment of SOTRs with COVID-19.
Methods: A search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar to gather relevant evidence through July 25, 2023. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (ver. 3.0, Biostat) was employed for data analysis.
Results: Ten studies, involving a total of 1,569 patients, were included. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences between the patients administered sotrovimab and those treated with the standard of care. These differences were observed in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.67), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62), the need for supplemental oxygen therapy (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51), and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.70). However, no significant difference was observed between sotrovimab and other treatments regarding the rates of hospitalization or ICU admission (P>0.05). Regarding safety, sotrovimab was associated with a lower rate of adverse events compared to the absence of sotrovimab (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86).
Conclusions: These results suggest that sotrovimab may improve efficacy outcomes among SOTRs with COVID-19. Nevertheless, additional high-quality trials are necessary to confirm these findings.