Danilo Scordia, Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia, Jaime Coello, Rosa Vilaplana Ventura, Diana Elisa Jiménez-De-Santiago, Berta Singla Just, Omar Castaño-Sánchez, Carme Casas Arcarons, Marc Tchamitchian, Léa Garreau, Mohamed Emran, Sami Z. Mohamed, Mai Khedr, Mohamed Rashad, Roxanne Suzette Lorilla, Alexandre Parizel, Giuseppe Mancini, Antonella Iurato, Sergio Ponsá, Corrado Dimauro, Fabio Gresta, Salvatore Luciano Cosentino, Giorgio Testa
{"title":"在地中海国家,农林复合系统是否比单一栽培更有生产力?一个荟萃分析","authors":"Danilo Scordia, Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia, Jaime Coello, Rosa Vilaplana Ventura, Diana Elisa Jiménez-De-Santiago, Berta Singla Just, Omar Castaño-Sánchez, Carme Casas Arcarons, Marc Tchamitchian, Léa Garreau, Mohamed Emran, Sami Z. Mohamed, Mai Khedr, Mohamed Rashad, Roxanne Suzette Lorilla, Alexandre Parizel, Giuseppe Mancini, Antonella Iurato, Sergio Ponsá, Corrado Dimauro, Fabio Gresta, Salvatore Luciano Cosentino, Giorgio Testa","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry is gaining interest due to its potential in enhancing climate resilience and sustainability of farming systems. In this meta-analysis, the crop yield in agroforestry system compared to the control (sole crop) from thirty-six experimental field trials in Mediterranean countries was assessed. The response variable Wlog(RR) (i.e., the weighted natural logarithm of the response ratio) was analyzed by the 95% confidence intervals of mean and by fitting eight linear mixed models. Fixed effects, namely the tree cover (low, medium, high), the tree species (ash tree, chestnut, cork oak, holm oak, olive, poplar, walnut), and the crop species (alfalfa, barley, durum wheat, faba bean, forage, oat, pasture, pea, winter wheat) were significant (<i>P</i> = 0.030, <i>P</i> = 0.017, and <i>P</i> = 0.014, respectively), while the system type (alley cropping, silvo-arable, silvo-pastoral) was not. Among management practices (variety, pruning, fertilization, irrigation, crop age classes, imposed warming and drought, harvest time), only the fertilization significantly improved the response variable (<i>P</i> = 0.006), while the interaction of pruning × crop species was marginally significant (<i>P</i> = 0.065). Relatively large study heterogeneity was observed (<i>Q</i> = 72.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 72%), which is quite common for agronomic meta-analysis. On the contrary, publication bias based on funnel plots and the Trim and Fill method suggested symmetrical distribution of studies. The sensitivity analysis for significant models identified room for improvements. Overall, we observed a negative effect of trees on crop yield that could be ascribed to the competition for light. Nonetheless, facilitation could be expected under extreme climate events, provided that agricultural practices will maximize synergies among tree cover, tree species, crop species, and management. Future works are encouraged to focus on the overall benefit agroforestry can provide at the field and landscape level, along with long-term monitoring to assess the whole lifespan of these systems and other companion planting options and designs in the Mediterranean region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are agroforestry systems more productive than monocultures in Mediterranean countries? A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Scordia, Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia, Jaime Coello, Rosa Vilaplana Ventura, Diana Elisa Jiménez-De-Santiago, Berta Singla Just, Omar Castaño-Sánchez, Carme Casas Arcarons, Marc Tchamitchian, Léa Garreau, Mohamed Emran, Sami Z. Mohamed, Mai Khedr, Mohamed Rashad, Roxanne Suzette Lorilla, Alexandre Parizel, Giuseppe Mancini, Antonella Iurato, Sergio Ponsá, Corrado Dimauro, Fabio Gresta, Salvatore Luciano Cosentino, Giorgio Testa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agroforestry is gaining interest due to its potential in enhancing climate resilience and sustainability of farming systems. In this meta-analysis, the crop yield in agroforestry system compared to the control (sole crop) from thirty-six experimental field trials in Mediterranean countries was assessed. The response variable Wlog(RR) (i.e., the weighted natural logarithm of the response ratio) was analyzed by the 95% confidence intervals of mean and by fitting eight linear mixed models. Fixed effects, namely the tree cover (low, medium, high), the tree species (ash tree, chestnut, cork oak, holm oak, olive, poplar, walnut), and the crop species (alfalfa, barley, durum wheat, faba bean, forage, oat, pasture, pea, winter wheat) were significant (<i>P</i> = 0.030, <i>P</i> = 0.017, and <i>P</i> = 0.014, respectively), while the system type (alley cropping, silvo-arable, silvo-pastoral) was not. Among management practices (variety, pruning, fertilization, irrigation, crop age classes, imposed warming and drought, harvest time), only the fertilization significantly improved the response variable (<i>P</i> = 0.006), while the interaction of pruning × crop species was marginally significant (<i>P</i> = 0.065). Relatively large study heterogeneity was observed (<i>Q</i> = 72.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 72%), which is quite common for agronomic meta-analysis. On the contrary, publication bias based on funnel plots and the Trim and Fill method suggested symmetrical distribution of studies. The sensitivity analysis for significant models identified room for improvements. Overall, we observed a negative effect of trees on crop yield that could be ascribed to the competition for light. Nonetheless, facilitation could be expected under extreme climate events, provided that agricultural practices will maximize synergies among tree cover, tree species, crop species, and management. Future works are encouraged to focus on the overall benefit agroforestry can provide at the field and landscape level, along with long-term monitoring to assess the whole lifespan of these systems and other companion planting options and designs in the Mediterranean region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00927-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are agroforestry systems more productive than monocultures in Mediterranean countries? A meta-analysis
Agroforestry is gaining interest due to its potential in enhancing climate resilience and sustainability of farming systems. In this meta-analysis, the crop yield in agroforestry system compared to the control (sole crop) from thirty-six experimental field trials in Mediterranean countries was assessed. The response variable Wlog(RR) (i.e., the weighted natural logarithm of the response ratio) was analyzed by the 95% confidence intervals of mean and by fitting eight linear mixed models. Fixed effects, namely the tree cover (low, medium, high), the tree species (ash tree, chestnut, cork oak, holm oak, olive, poplar, walnut), and the crop species (alfalfa, barley, durum wheat, faba bean, forage, oat, pasture, pea, winter wheat) were significant (P = 0.030, P = 0.017, and P = 0.014, respectively), while the system type (alley cropping, silvo-arable, silvo-pastoral) was not. Among management practices (variety, pruning, fertilization, irrigation, crop age classes, imposed warming and drought, harvest time), only the fertilization significantly improved the response variable (P = 0.006), while the interaction of pruning × crop species was marginally significant (P = 0.065). Relatively large study heterogeneity was observed (Q = 72.6, I2 = 72%), which is quite common for agronomic meta-analysis. On the contrary, publication bias based on funnel plots and the Trim and Fill method suggested symmetrical distribution of studies. The sensitivity analysis for significant models identified room for improvements. Overall, we observed a negative effect of trees on crop yield that could be ascribed to the competition for light. Nonetheless, facilitation could be expected under extreme climate events, provided that agricultural practices will maximize synergies among tree cover, tree species, crop species, and management. Future works are encouraged to focus on the overall benefit agroforestry can provide at the field and landscape level, along with long-term monitoring to assess the whole lifespan of these systems and other companion planting options and designs in the Mediterranean region.
期刊介绍:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences.
ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels.
Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.