急诊科手术镇静镇痛后血管造影与恢复时间的关系

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shogo Shirane, Hiraku Funakoshi, Jin Takahashi, Yosuke Homma, Tatsuya Norii
{"title":"急诊科手术镇静镇痛后血管造影与恢复时间的关系","authors":"Shogo Shirane,&nbsp;Hiraku Funakoshi,&nbsp;Jin Takahashi,&nbsp;Yosuke Homma,&nbsp;Tatsuya Norii","doi":"10.1002/ams2.901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Capnography is recommended for use in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA); however, limited studies assess its impact on recovery time. We investigated the association between capnography and the recovery time of PSA in the emergency department (ED).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter PSA patient registry including eight hospitals in Japan. We included all patients who received PSA in the ED between May 2017 and May 2021 and divided the patients into capnography and no-capnography groups. The primary outcome was recovery time, defined as the time from the end of the procedure to the cessation of monitoring. The log-rank test and multivariable analysis using clustering for institutions were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 1265 screened patients, 943 patients who received PSA were enrolled and categorized into the capnography (<i>n</i> = 150, 16%) and no-capnography (<i>n</i> = 793, 84%) groups. The median recovery time was 40 (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–63) min in the capnography group and 30 (IQR: 14–55) min in the no-capnography group. In the log-rank test, the recovery time was significantly longer in the capnography group (<i>p</i> = 0.03) than in the no-capnography group. In the multivariable analysis, recovery time did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.61).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this secondary analysis of the multicenter registry of PSA in Japan, capnography use did not associate with shorter recovery time in the ED.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between capnography and recovery time after procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Shogo Shirane,&nbsp;Hiraku Funakoshi,&nbsp;Jin Takahashi,&nbsp;Yosuke Homma,&nbsp;Tatsuya Norii\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ams2.901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Capnography is recommended for use in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA); however, limited studies assess its impact on recovery time. We investigated the association between capnography and the recovery time of PSA in the emergency department (ED).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter PSA patient registry including eight hospitals in Japan. We included all patients who received PSA in the ED between May 2017 and May 2021 and divided the patients into capnography and no-capnography groups. The primary outcome was recovery time, defined as the time from the end of the procedure to the cessation of monitoring. The log-rank test and multivariable analysis using clustering for institutions were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 1265 screened patients, 943 patients who received PSA were enrolled and categorized into the capnography (<i>n</i> = 150, 16%) and no-capnography (<i>n</i> = 793, 84%) groups. The median recovery time was 40 (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–63) min in the capnography group and 30 (IQR: 14–55) min in the no-capnography group. In the log-rank test, the recovery time was significantly longer in the capnography group (<i>p</i> = 0.03) than in the no-capnography group. In the multivariable analysis, recovery time did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.61).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this secondary analysis of the multicenter registry of PSA in Japan, capnography use did not associate with shorter recovery time in the ED.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604570/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在手术镇静镇痛(PSA)中推荐使用血管造影;然而,有限的研究评估其对恢复时间的影响。我们探讨了急诊科(ED)患者前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)恢复时间与血管造影的关系。方法:本研究是对包括日本8家医院在内的多中心PSA患者登记的二次分析。我们纳入了2017年5月至2021年5月期间在ED接受PSA的所有患者,并将患者分为血管造影组和非血管造影组。主要结果是恢复时间,定义为从手术结束到停止监测的时间。对机构进行了对数秩检验和多变量聚类分析。结果在1265例筛查患者中,943例接受PSA的患者入组,分为前列腺造影组(n = 150, 16%)和非前列腺造影组(n = 793, 84%)。造影组的中位恢复时间为40(四分位间距[IQR]: 25-63) min,未造影组的中位恢复时间为30 (IQR: 14-55) min。在log-rank检验中,造影组的恢复时间明显长于无造影组(p = 0.03)。在多变量分析中,两组的恢复时间没有差异(校正风险比,0.95;95%置信区间0.77-1.17;p = 0.61)。结论:在对日本PSA多中心登记的二次分析中,前列腺造影的使用与急症患者较短的恢复时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association between capnography and recovery time after procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department

Association between capnography and recovery time after procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department

Aim

Capnography is recommended for use in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA); however, limited studies assess its impact on recovery time. We investigated the association between capnography and the recovery time of PSA in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter PSA patient registry including eight hospitals in Japan. We included all patients who received PSA in the ED between May 2017 and May 2021 and divided the patients into capnography and no-capnography groups. The primary outcome was recovery time, defined as the time from the end of the procedure to the cessation of monitoring. The log-rank test and multivariable analysis using clustering for institutions were performed.

Results

Of the 1265 screened patients, 943 patients who received PSA were enrolled and categorized into the capnography (n = 150, 16%) and no-capnography (n = 793, 84%) groups. The median recovery time was 40 (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–63) min in the capnography group and 30 (IQR: 14–55) min in the no-capnography group. In the log-rank test, the recovery time was significantly longer in the capnography group (p = 0.03) than in the no-capnography group. In the multivariable analysis, recovery time did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.17; p = 0.61).

Conclusion

In this secondary analysis of the multicenter registry of PSA in Japan, capnography use did not associate with shorter recovery time in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信