早期CRP动力学预测转移性肾癌一线免疫检查点抑制联合治疗的长期疗效:应用不同CRP动力学定义的最新多中心真实世界经验

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Benedikt Hoeh, Cristina Cano Garcia, Severine Banek, Niklas Klümper, Alexander Cox, Jörg Ellinger, Philipp Schmucker, Oliver Hahn, Angelika Mattigk, Friedemann Zengerling, Philippe Becker, Kati Erdmann, Bjoern Thorben Buerk, Luka Flegar, Johannes Huber, Charis Kalogirou, Philip Zeuschner
{"title":"早期CRP动力学预测转移性肾癌一线免疫检查点抑制联合治疗的长期疗效:应用不同CRP动力学定义的最新多中心真实世界经验","authors":"Benedikt Hoeh,&nbsp;Cristina Cano Garcia,&nbsp;Severine Banek,&nbsp;Niklas Klümper,&nbsp;Alexander Cox,&nbsp;Jörg Ellinger,&nbsp;Philipp Schmucker,&nbsp;Oliver Hahn,&nbsp;Angelika Mattigk,&nbsp;Friedemann Zengerling,&nbsp;Philippe Becker,&nbsp;Kati Erdmann,&nbsp;Bjoern Thorben Buerk,&nbsp;Luka Flegar,&nbsp;Johannes Huber,&nbsp;Charis Kalogirou,&nbsp;Philip Zeuschner","doi":"10.1002/cti2.1471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda <i>et al.</i>, patients were defined as ‘CRP flare-responder’, ‘CRP responder’ and ‘non-CRP responder’; according to Ishihara <i>et al.</i>, patients were defined as ‘normal’, ‘normalised’ and ‘non-normalised’ based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":152,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Hoeh,&nbsp;Cristina Cano Garcia,&nbsp;Severine Banek,&nbsp;Niklas Klümper,&nbsp;Alexander Cox,&nbsp;Jörg Ellinger,&nbsp;Philipp Schmucker,&nbsp;Oliver Hahn,&nbsp;Angelika Mattigk,&nbsp;Friedemann Zengerling,&nbsp;Philippe Becker,&nbsp;Kati Erdmann,&nbsp;Bjoern Thorben Buerk,&nbsp;Luka Flegar,&nbsp;Johannes Huber,&nbsp;Charis Kalogirou,&nbsp;Philip Zeuschner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cti2.1471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda <i>et al.</i>, patients were defined as ‘CRP flare-responder’, ‘CRP responder’ and ‘non-CRP responder’; according to Ishihara <i>et al.</i>, patients were defined as ‘normal’, ‘normalised’ and ‘non-normalised’ based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Immunology\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.1471\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.1471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然预测一线转移性肾癌(mRCC)治疗反应的生物标志物仍有待确定,但c反应蛋白(CRP)动力学最近与免疫治疗(IO)反应相关。在这里,我们的目的是评估两种当代CRP动力学定义在一个大型、真实的一线mRCC队列中的预测和预后能力。方法回顾性分析5年内接受基于io的一线治疗的转移性肾癌患者。根据Fukuda等人的研究,患者被定义为“CRP反应者”、“CRP反应者”和“非CRP反应者”;根据Ishihara等人的研究,根据患者的早期CRP动力学将其定义为“正常”、“正常化”和“非正常化”。比较患者和肿瘤特征,并通过总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)测量治疗结果,包括多变量Cox回归分析。结果在316例mRCC患者中,227例(72%)被分配到CRP组。CRP耀斑(HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59)和CRP应答者(HR: 0.52)均比非CRP应答者有更长的PFS,但无OS。根据Ishihara的说法,276例(87%)患者被分配到各自的组,与非正常化组相比,正常和正常化患者的PFS和OS都明显更长。结论不同的早期CRP动力学可以预测一线mRCC治疗的疗效。然而,关于最佳的测量时间和频率还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions

Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions

Objectives

Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort.

Methods

Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda et al., patients were defined as ‘CRP flare-responder’, ‘CRP responder’ and ‘non-CRP responder’; according to Ishihara et al., patients were defined as ‘normal’, ‘normalised’ and ‘non-normalised’ based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results

Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group.

Conclusion

Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical & Translational Immunology
Clinical & Translational Immunology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
77
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Translational Immunology is an open access, fully peer-reviewed journal devoted to publishing cutting-edge advances in biomedical research for scientists and physicians. The Journal covers fields including cancer biology, cardiovascular research, gene therapy, immunology, vaccine development and disease pathogenesis and therapy at the earliest phases of investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信