{"title":"视频尿动力学案例研究:一个独特的经验教训","authors":"Lynn Ng Yun Shu, Wang Fenfen, Ng Lay Guat","doi":"10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.","PeriodicalId":85039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of urological nursing","volume":"38 1","pages":"36–41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Study in Video Urodynamics: A Unique Lesson Learned\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Ng Yun Shu, Wang Fenfen, Ng Lay Guat\",\"doi\":\"10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of urological nursing\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"36–41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of urological nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of urological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2018.38.1.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Case Study in Video Urodynamics: A Unique Lesson Learned
&NA; The following case discusses a 62‐year‐old female patient who presented to a local emergency department with severe abdominal pain and acute urinary retention secondary to bladder stones. She was diagnosed with a cystocele and uterine prolapse. Video urodynamic studies (VUDS) were undertaken for further evaluation, but due to the altered anatomical landmarks, the left ureter was inadvertently initially cannulated, then corrected.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
