纪念:克拉克·拜斯

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
S. Breyer, E. Kagan, A. Kaufman, Todd D. Rakoff, P. Strauss, Richard K. Willard
{"title":"纪念:克拉克·拜斯","authors":"S. Breyer, E. Kagan, A. Kaufman, Todd D. Rakoff, P. Strauss, Richard K. Willard","doi":"10.7916/D8R78F7T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clark Byse was a member of that great generation of scholars that created administrative law. He worked with Walter Gellhorn, Louis Jaffe, Kenneth Culp Davis, Nat Nathanson, and a handful of others. They began with a few traditional common law rules, a new federal statute, a group of New Deal agencies, and a growing number of judicial decisions. They formed these materials into more coherent legal principles, approaches, and systems of interpretation. They helped to define the proper relationship between citizen and government in a world that must rely upon administrative expertise to translate the electorate’s desires into effective policy and action. In a word, Clark and those few others were the intellectual architects of the modern democratic administrative state. Clark Byse as scholar participated fully in that great enterprise. His casebook with Walter Gellhorn, now in its tenth edition, is a legal classic.1 He did not limit his writing to administrative law, however, for he also wrote much of value about, for example, contracts, civil procedure, and academic freedom. Clark Byse as teacher taught administrative law and contract law to generations of law students. His object was to transmit what we call “legal thinking” — the disciplined, critical, purpose-oriented approach that underlies American law. Indeed, Clark made a point of telling his students, “[N]ever forget that the emphasis in this class is on what and how you think, not on what some judge or treatise writer or","PeriodicalId":48320,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Memoriam: Clark Byse\",\"authors\":\"S. Breyer, E. Kagan, A. Kaufman, Todd D. Rakoff, P. Strauss, Richard K. Willard\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8R78F7T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clark Byse was a member of that great generation of scholars that created administrative law. He worked with Walter Gellhorn, Louis Jaffe, Kenneth Culp Davis, Nat Nathanson, and a handful of others. They began with a few traditional common law rules, a new federal statute, a group of New Deal agencies, and a growing number of judicial decisions. They formed these materials into more coherent legal principles, approaches, and systems of interpretation. They helped to define the proper relationship between citizen and government in a world that must rely upon administrative expertise to translate the electorate’s desires into effective policy and action. In a word, Clark and those few others were the intellectual architects of the modern democratic administrative state. Clark Byse as scholar participated fully in that great enterprise. His casebook with Walter Gellhorn, now in its tenth edition, is a legal classic.1 He did not limit his writing to administrative law, however, for he also wrote much of value about, for example, contracts, civil procedure, and academic freedom. Clark Byse as teacher taught administrative law and contract law to generations of law students. His object was to transmit what we call “legal thinking” — the disciplined, critical, purpose-oriented approach that underlies American law. Indeed, Clark made a point of telling his students, “[N]ever forget that the emphasis in this class is on what and how you think, not on what some judge or treatise writer or\",\"PeriodicalId\":48320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8R78F7T\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8R78F7T","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

克拉克·拜斯是创造行政法的伟大一代学者中的一员。他与Walter Gellhorn, Louis Jaffe, Kenneth Culp Davis, Nat Nathanson以及其他一些人一起工作。他们从一些传统的普通法规则、一部新的联邦法规、一批新政机构和越来越多的司法裁决开始。他们将这些材料形成更连贯的法律原则、方法和解释系统。在一个必须依靠行政专业知识将选民的愿望转化为有效的政策和行动的世界里,他们帮助界定了公民与政府之间的适当关系。总之,克拉克和其他几个人是现代民主行政国家的思想建筑师。克拉克·拜斯作为学者完全参与了这项伟大的事业。他与沃尔特·盖尔霍恩(Walter Gellhorn)的案例汇编,现在已经是第十版了,是一部法律经典然而,他的著作并不局限于行政法,因为他也写了很多有价值的东西,比如合同、民事诉讼程序和学术自由。克拉克·拜斯作为一名教师,向一代又一代的法学学生教授行政法和合同法。他的目的是传播我们所说的“法律思维”——一种有纪律的、批判性的、以目的为导向的方法,这是美国法律的基础。的确,克拉克对他的学生们说:“永远不要忘记,这门课的重点是你思考的内容和方式,而不是某些法官或论文作家或学者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Memoriam: Clark Byse
Clark Byse was a member of that great generation of scholars that created administrative law. He worked with Walter Gellhorn, Louis Jaffe, Kenneth Culp Davis, Nat Nathanson, and a handful of others. They began with a few traditional common law rules, a new federal statute, a group of New Deal agencies, and a growing number of judicial decisions. They formed these materials into more coherent legal principles, approaches, and systems of interpretation. They helped to define the proper relationship between citizen and government in a world that must rely upon administrative expertise to translate the electorate’s desires into effective policy and action. In a word, Clark and those few others were the intellectual architects of the modern democratic administrative state. Clark Byse as scholar participated fully in that great enterprise. His casebook with Walter Gellhorn, now in its tenth edition, is a legal classic.1 He did not limit his writing to administrative law, however, for he also wrote much of value about, for example, contracts, civil procedure, and academic freedom. Clark Byse as teacher taught administrative law and contract law to generations of law students. His object was to transmit what we call “legal thinking” — the disciplined, critical, purpose-oriented approach that underlies American law. Indeed, Clark made a point of telling his students, “[N]ever forget that the emphasis in this class is on what and how you think, not on what some judge or treatise writer or
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors. The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信