迈向新的发展模式:战略、政策和进程

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Stiglitz
{"title":"迈向新的发展模式:战略、政策和进程","authors":"J. Stiglitz","doi":"10.7916/D8MC98VB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,","PeriodicalId":39357,"journal":{"name":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies and Processes\",\"authors\":\"J. Stiglitz\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8MC98VB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,\",\"PeriodicalId\":39357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Econometrics and International Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"120\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Econometrics and International Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8MC98VB\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Econometrics and International Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8MC98VB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

摘要

今年年初,我在赫尔辛基向世界发展经济学研究所(WIDER)发表讲话时指出,我们需要超越华盛顿共识:发展有比该共识所体现的更广泛的目标,该共识所关注的一套政策建议肯定不足以促进发展,事实上,一些最成功的开发国家几乎没有注意到它的意见。这种共识常常混淆了手段和目的:它把私有化和贸易自由化本身作为目的,而不是作为实现更可持续、公平和民主增长的手段。我在那里谈到了华盛顿共识误入歧途的许多方面。它过于关注价格稳定,而不是经济增长和产出稳定。它没有认识到,加强金融机构对经济稳定的重要性,完全不亚于控制预算赤字和增加货币供应。它着重于私有化,但对使市场发挥作用所需的体制基础设施,特别是竞争的重要性重视得太少。在今天的讲座中,我想超越华盛顿共识的这些已被充分证明的失败,开始提供另一种范式的基础,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies and Processes
In an address to the World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki at the beginning of this year, I argued that we needed to go beyond the Washington consensus: there were broader objectives to development than were embodied in that consensus, the set of policy recommendations upon which it focused was certainly not sufficient for development, and indeed some of the most successful developers had paid little heed to its dictums. That consensus all too often confused means with ends: it took privatization and trade liberalization as ends in themselves, rather than as means to more sustainable, equitable, and democratic growth. I talked there about many of the ways in which the Washington consensus had gone astray. It focused too much on price stability, rather than growth and the stability of output. It failed to recognize that strengthening financial institutions is every bit as important to economic stability as controlling budget deficits and increasing the money supply. It focused on privatization, but paid too little attention to the institutional infrastructure that is required to make markets work, and especially to the importance of competition. In today’s lecture, I want to go beyond these by now well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Econometrics and International Development
Applied Econometrics and International Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This journal is scheduled to finish publication in year 2020, after reaching its goals.AEID is a refereed and printed journal in English, published for the period 2001-2020, included in Econ-Lit, SCOPUS, IBSS, SSRN and other selected indexes of Economics research. The emphasis is on economic development with and international and quantitative approach, and the main aim is to foster international cooperation to development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信