通过模拟测量误差对基于重力测定的三轴加速度计特性进行 B 类不确定性分析。

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Jon Geist, Michael Gaitan
{"title":"通过模拟测量误差对基于重力测定的三轴加速度计特性进行 B 类不确定性分析。","authors":"Jon Geist, Michael Gaitan","doi":"10.6028/jres.126.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We simulated the effects of gimbal-alignment errors and rotational step-size errors on measurements of the sensitivity matrix and intrinsic properties of a triaxial accelerometer. We restricted the study to measurements carried out on a two-axis calibration system using a previously described measurement and analysis protocol. As well as imperfections in the calibration system, we simulated imperfect orthogonality of the accelerometer axes and non-identical sensitivity of the individual accelerometers in an otherwise perfect triaxial accelerometer, but we left characterization of other accelerometer imperfections such as non-linearity for future study. Within this framework, sensitivity-matrix errors are caused by imperfections in the construction and installation of the accelerometer calibration system, but not by the accelerometer imperfections included in the simulations. We use the results of this study to assign type B uncertainties to the components of the sensitivity matrix and related intrinsic properties due to imperfections in the measurement system. For calibrations using a reasonably well manufactured and installed multi-axis rotation stage such as that studied in this paper, we estimated upper bounds to the standard uncertainties of the order of 1×10-5, 2×10-5, 5×10-5, and 2×10-4 for the intrinsic sensitivities, diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, off-diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, and zero-acceleration offsets, relative to a sensitivity-matrix element of 1, respectively, and 5×10-3 degrees for the intrinsic angles.</p>","PeriodicalId":54766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"126038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type B Uncertainty Analysis of Gravity-Based Determinations of Triaxial-Accelerometer Properties by Simulation of Measurement Errors.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Geist, Michael Gaitan\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.126.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We simulated the effects of gimbal-alignment errors and rotational step-size errors on measurements of the sensitivity matrix and intrinsic properties of a triaxial accelerometer. We restricted the study to measurements carried out on a two-axis calibration system using a previously described measurement and analysis protocol. As well as imperfections in the calibration system, we simulated imperfect orthogonality of the accelerometer axes and non-identical sensitivity of the individual accelerometers in an otherwise perfect triaxial accelerometer, but we left characterization of other accelerometer imperfections such as non-linearity for future study. Within this framework, sensitivity-matrix errors are caused by imperfections in the construction and installation of the accelerometer calibration system, but not by the accelerometer imperfections included in the simulations. We use the results of this study to assign type B uncertainties to the components of the sensitivity matrix and related intrinsic properties due to imperfections in the measurement system. For calibrations using a reasonably well manufactured and installed multi-axis rotation stage such as that studied in this paper, we estimated upper bounds to the standard uncertainties of the order of 1×10-5, 2×10-5, 5×10-5, and 2×10-4 for the intrinsic sensitivities, diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, off-diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, and zero-acceleration offsets, relative to a sensitivity-matrix element of 1, respectively, and 5×10-3 degrees for the intrinsic angles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"126038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249360/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们模拟了万向节对准误差和旋转步长误差对三轴加速度计灵敏度矩阵和固有特性测量的影响。我们的研究仅限于在双轴校准系统上使用先前描述的测量和分析协议进行的测量。除了校准系统中的缺陷外,我们还模拟了加速度计轴的不完全正交性和完美三轴加速度计中单个加速度计的非相同灵敏度,但我们将加速度计其他缺陷(如非线性)的特征描述留待今后研究。在此框架内,灵敏度矩阵误差是由加速度计校准系统的构造和安装缺陷造成的,而不是由模拟中的加速度计缺陷造成的。我们利用这项研究的结果,为灵敏度矩阵和相关固有特性的分量分配因测量系统不完善而造成的 B 类不确定度。对于使用制造和安装合理的多轴旋转平台(如本文研究的平台)进行的校准,我们估算出的标准不确定度上限分别为:本征灵敏度、灵敏度矩阵对角线元素、灵敏度矩阵非对角线元素和零加速度偏移 1×10-5、2×10-5、5×10-5 和 2×10-4,相对于灵敏度矩阵元素 1 和本征角度 5×10-3 度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Type B Uncertainty Analysis of Gravity-Based Determinations of Triaxial-Accelerometer Properties by Simulation of Measurement Errors.

We simulated the effects of gimbal-alignment errors and rotational step-size errors on measurements of the sensitivity matrix and intrinsic properties of a triaxial accelerometer. We restricted the study to measurements carried out on a two-axis calibration system using a previously described measurement and analysis protocol. As well as imperfections in the calibration system, we simulated imperfect orthogonality of the accelerometer axes and non-identical sensitivity of the individual accelerometers in an otherwise perfect triaxial accelerometer, but we left characterization of other accelerometer imperfections such as non-linearity for future study. Within this framework, sensitivity-matrix errors are caused by imperfections in the construction and installation of the accelerometer calibration system, but not by the accelerometer imperfections included in the simulations. We use the results of this study to assign type B uncertainties to the components of the sensitivity matrix and related intrinsic properties due to imperfections in the measurement system. For calibrations using a reasonably well manufactured and installed multi-axis rotation stage such as that studied in this paper, we estimated upper bounds to the standard uncertainties of the order of 1×10-5, 2×10-5, 5×10-5, and 2×10-4 for the intrinsic sensitivities, diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, off-diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix, and zero-acceleration offsets, relative to a sensitivity-matrix element of 1, respectively, and 5×10-3 degrees for the intrinsic angles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is the flagship publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been published under various titles and forms since 1904, with its roots as Scientific Papers issued as the Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. In 1928, the Scientific Papers were combined with Technologic Papers, which reported results of investigations of material and methods of testing. This new publication was titled the Bureau of Standards Journal of Research. The Journal of Research of NIST reports NIST research and development in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, information technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信