商事条款的原则性解释

IF 0.6 4区社会学 Q2 LAW

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.7916/D86H4H17

T. Merrill

{"title":"商事条款的原则性解释","authors":"T. Merrill","doi":"10.7916/D86H4H17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formalism is the jurisprudence of rules.1 Functionalism is the jurisprudence of balancing tests.2 If forced to choose between formalism and functionalism, I would probably corne down on the side of formalism. I would not do so, however, because there is some meta-rule that prescribes formalism. Rather, it would be because formalism, on balance, has better consequences than functionalism-in other words, because there are good functionalist reasons to be a formalist.3 Where I part company with many constitutional formalists is not so much over the desirability of rules as opposed to ad hoc balancing,4 but rather over the generality and the source of the","PeriodicalId":46083,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Principled Interpretation of the Commerce Clause\",\"authors\":\"T. Merrill\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D86H4H17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formalism is the jurisprudence of rules.1 Functionalism is the jurisprudence of balancing tests.2 If forced to choose between formalism and functionalism, I would probably corne down on the side of formalism. I would not do so, however, because there is some meta-rule that prescribes formalism. Rather, it would be because formalism, on balance, has better consequences than functionalism-in other words, because there are good functionalist reasons to be a formalist.3 Where I part company with many constitutional formalists is not so much over the desirability of rules as opposed to ad hoc balancing,4 but rather over the generality and the source of the\",\"PeriodicalId\":46083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"31-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D86H4H17\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D86H4H17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

形式主义是规则的法学功能主义是平衡检验的法理学如果必须在形式主义和功能主义之间做出选择，我可能会选择形式主义。但我不会这么做，因为存在一些规定形式主义的元规则。相反，这可能是因为形式主义总的来说比功能主义有更好的结果——换句话说，因为功能主义者有很好的理由成为一名形式主义者我与许多宪法形式主义者的分歧并不在于规则的可取性，而在于与临时平衡相对立，而是在于规则的普遍性和来源

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Toward a Principled Interpretation of the Commerce Clause

Formalism is the jurisprudence of rules.1 Functionalism is the jurisprudence of balancing tests.2 If forced to choose between formalism and functionalism, I would probably corne down on the side of formalism. I would not do so, however, because there is some meta-rule that prescribes formalism. Rather, it would be because formalism, on balance, has better consequences than functionalism-in other words, because there are good functionalist reasons to be a formalist.3 Where I part company with many constitutional formalists is not so much over the desirability of rules as opposed to ad hoc balancing,4 but rather over the generality and the source of the

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy LAW-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy is published three times annually by the Harvard Society for Law & Public Policy, Inc., an organization of Harvard Law School students. The Journal is one of the most widely circulated student-edited law reviews and the nation’s leading forum for conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. The late Stephen Eberhard and former Senator and Secretary of Energy E. Spencer Abraham founded the journal twenty-eight years ago and many journal alumni have risen to prominent legal positions in the government and at the nation’s top law firms.