{"title":"C、N和O的CPAA和H的ERDA和NRA的准确性","authors":"T. Nozaki","doi":"10.6028/jres.093.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trace amounts of H, C, N and 0 can be determined by only a few methods, often with rather poor accuracies. Charged particle activation analysis (CPAA) is highly reliable for C, N and 0, and is used for calibration of other methods. Elastic recoil detection analysis (ERDA) and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) have recently been utilized for H and D near the surface. Accuracies in these analyses are discussed on the basis of our experimental data.","PeriodicalId":17082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","volume":"93 1","pages":"482 - 484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy in CPAA for C, N and O and in ERDA and NRA for H\",\"authors\":\"T. Nozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.093.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trace amounts of H, C, N and 0 can be determined by only a few methods, often with rather poor accuracies. Charged particle activation analysis (CPAA) is highly reliable for C, N and 0, and is used for calibration of other methods. Elastic recoil detection analysis (ERDA) and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) have recently been utilized for H and D near the surface. Accuracies in these analyses are discussed on the basis of our experimental data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"482 - 484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy in CPAA for C, N and O and in ERDA and NRA for H
Trace amounts of H, C, N and 0 can be determined by only a few methods, often with rather poor accuracies. Charged particle activation analysis (CPAA) is highly reliable for C, N and 0, and is used for calibration of other methods. Elastic recoil detection analysis (ERDA) and nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) have recently been utilized for H and D near the surface. Accuracies in these analyses are discussed on the basis of our experimental data.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
