{"title":"化学计量学与标准","authors":"L. Currie","doi":"10.6028/jres.093.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standards are central to the achievement and maintenance of accuracy in trace analysis. This fact is well-known and well-accepted in the international analytical chemical community, where \"standards\" are generally considered to be Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) or Certified Reference Materials (CRMs). The term, standards, however, is multivalued, as noted recently by a former Director of the National Bureau of Standards [1]. That is, even in our more conventional view of trace analysis, we must consider in addition to standard materials: standard procedures (protocols), standard data (reference data), standard units (SI), standard nomenclature, standard (certified) instruments, and standard tolerances (regulatory standards, specifications, norms) [2]. It is interesting, in light of these several types of \"standards\" which have some bearing oil accuracy in trace analysis, to consider the possible significance of standards in and for Chemometrics. To pursue this objective, we first must have a common understanding of the meaning of the term, chemometrics, and what significance it may have for accurate trace analysis. A concise definition is given by the subtitle of the volume which resulted from the first NATO Advanced Study Institute on Chemometrics, i.e., \"Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry\" [3]. Implications for accuracy, especially accuracy in trace analysis, are immediately evident. That is, wherever mathematical or statistical operations contribute to the experimental design, data evaluation, assumption testing, or quality control for accurate chemical analysis, \"chemometric standards\" are at least implicitly relevant. The major part of this paper will be devoted to an explicit discussion of such chemometric standards, including case studies drawn from recent research at the National Bureau of Standards. The discussion will be placed in the framework of the Analytical System, or Chemical Measurement Process (CMP), for such a perspective makes it possible to consider logically a \"theory of analytical chemistry\"; and certainly chemometrics is a very important part of such a theory [4,5]. To set the stage, the next section will include a brief view of the current content of Chemometrics, together with a summary of its history and literature. This article will conclude with a glimpse at the future of chemometrics, with special emphasis on means to achieve increased accuracy in our chemical measurements and increased understanding of the external (physical, biological, geochemical) systems which provide the driving forces for analytical chemistry.","PeriodicalId":17082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","volume":"93 1","pages":"193 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemometrics and Standards\",\"authors\":\"L. Currie\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.093.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standards are central to the achievement and maintenance of accuracy in trace analysis. This fact is well-known and well-accepted in the international analytical chemical community, where \\\"standards\\\" are generally considered to be Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) or Certified Reference Materials (CRMs). The term, standards, however, is multivalued, as noted recently by a former Director of the National Bureau of Standards [1]. That is, even in our more conventional view of trace analysis, we must consider in addition to standard materials: standard procedures (protocols), standard data (reference data), standard units (SI), standard nomenclature, standard (certified) instruments, and standard tolerances (regulatory standards, specifications, norms) [2]. It is interesting, in light of these several types of \\\"standards\\\" which have some bearing oil accuracy in trace analysis, to consider the possible significance of standards in and for Chemometrics. To pursue this objective, we first must have a common understanding of the meaning of the term, chemometrics, and what significance it may have for accurate trace analysis. A concise definition is given by the subtitle of the volume which resulted from the first NATO Advanced Study Institute on Chemometrics, i.e., \\\"Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry\\\" [3]. Implications for accuracy, especially accuracy in trace analysis, are immediately evident. That is, wherever mathematical or statistical operations contribute to the experimental design, data evaluation, assumption testing, or quality control for accurate chemical analysis, \\\"chemometric standards\\\" are at least implicitly relevant. The major part of this paper will be devoted to an explicit discussion of such chemometric standards, including case studies drawn from recent research at the National Bureau of Standards. The discussion will be placed in the framework of the Analytical System, or Chemical Measurement Process (CMP), for such a perspective makes it possible to consider logically a \\\"theory of analytical chemistry\\\"; and certainly chemometrics is a very important part of such a theory [4,5]. To set the stage, the next section will include a brief view of the current content of Chemometrics, together with a summary of its history and literature. This article will conclude with a glimpse at the future of chemometrics, with special emphasis on means to achieve increased accuracy in our chemical measurements and increased understanding of the external (physical, biological, geochemical) systems which provide the driving forces for analytical chemistry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
标准是实现和维护痕量分析准确性的核心。这一事实在国际分析化学界是众所周知并被广泛接受的,其中“标准”通常被认为是标准参考物质(SRMs)或认证参考物质(crm)。然而,正如美国国家标准局(National Bureau of standards)前局长最近指出的那样,“标准”一词具有多重价值。也就是说,即使在我们对痕量分析的更传统的看法中,除了标准材料之外,我们还必须考虑:标准程序(协议)、标准数据(参考数据)、标准单位(SI)、标准命名法、标准(认证)仪器和标准公差(监管标准、规范、规范)[2]。有趣的是,鉴于这几种类型的“标准”在痕量分析中具有一定的轴承油精度,考虑化学计量学中标准的可能意义。为了实现这一目标,我们首先必须对化学计量学这个术语的含义有一个共同的理解,以及它对准确的痕量分析可能具有的意义。北大西洋公约组织第一所化学计量学高级研究所编写的那卷书的副标题,即“化学中的数学和统计”,给出了一个简明的定义。对准确性的影响,特别是对痕量分析的准确性,是显而易见的。也就是说,只要数学或统计操作有助于实验设计、数据评估、假设测试或精确化学分析的质量控制,“化学计量标准”至少是隐含相关的。本文的主要部分将致力于对这些化学计量标准的明确讨论,包括从国家标准局最近的研究中得出的案例研究。讨论将在分析系统或化学测量过程(CMP)的框架内进行,因为这样的观点使得从逻辑上考虑“分析化学理论”成为可能;当然,化学计量学是这种理论的一个非常重要的部分[4,5]。为了奠定基础,下一节将包括对化学计量学当前内容的简要介绍,以及对其历史和文献的总结。本文将以对化学计量学的未来的一瞥结束,特别强调在我们的化学测量中实现更高的准确性和增加对外部(物理,生物,地球化学)系统的理解,这些系统为分析化学提供了驱动力。
Standards are central to the achievement and maintenance of accuracy in trace analysis. This fact is well-known and well-accepted in the international analytical chemical community, where "standards" are generally considered to be Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) or Certified Reference Materials (CRMs). The term, standards, however, is multivalued, as noted recently by a former Director of the National Bureau of Standards [1]. That is, even in our more conventional view of trace analysis, we must consider in addition to standard materials: standard procedures (protocols), standard data (reference data), standard units (SI), standard nomenclature, standard (certified) instruments, and standard tolerances (regulatory standards, specifications, norms) [2]. It is interesting, in light of these several types of "standards" which have some bearing oil accuracy in trace analysis, to consider the possible significance of standards in and for Chemometrics. To pursue this objective, we first must have a common understanding of the meaning of the term, chemometrics, and what significance it may have for accurate trace analysis. A concise definition is given by the subtitle of the volume which resulted from the first NATO Advanced Study Institute on Chemometrics, i.e., "Mathematics and Statistics in Chemistry" [3]. Implications for accuracy, especially accuracy in trace analysis, are immediately evident. That is, wherever mathematical or statistical operations contribute to the experimental design, data evaluation, assumption testing, or quality control for accurate chemical analysis, "chemometric standards" are at least implicitly relevant. The major part of this paper will be devoted to an explicit discussion of such chemometric standards, including case studies drawn from recent research at the National Bureau of Standards. The discussion will be placed in the framework of the Analytical System, or Chemical Measurement Process (CMP), for such a perspective makes it possible to consider logically a "theory of analytical chemistry"; and certainly chemometrics is a very important part of such a theory [4,5]. To set the stage, the next section will include a brief view of the current content of Chemometrics, together with a summary of its history and literature. This article will conclude with a glimpse at the future of chemometrics, with special emphasis on means to achieve increased accuracy in our chemical measurements and increased understanding of the external (physical, biological, geochemical) systems which provide the driving forces for analytical chemistry.