专家系统和机器人技术

T. Isenhour, J. C. Marshall
{"title":"专家系统和机器人技术","authors":"T. Isenhour, J. C. Marshall","doi":"10.6028/jres.093.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early sixties, AI researchers attempted to simulate the complicated process of thinking by finding general methods for solving broad classes of problems. This proved too difficult and such attempts failed. In the early seventies the problem was reformulated to include careful attention to data structures but the emphasis was still on general knowledge. Progress was still limited. In the late seventies the problem was further refined to focus almost completely on the knowledge representation. The goal was to make intelligent programs by providing them with high quality, domain-specific knowledge about some limited problem area. This strategy is much like that used by a human expert and gives rise to the term \"expert system.\" What domains are appropriate for expert system work? First and foremost, for the present state of expert systems technology the problem domain must be of limited scope. A majority of the people within the application field must agree that real experts do exist. The problem must be knowledge, not data, intensive. A problem is knowledge intensive if there is substantial variability in people's ability to solve it. The problem must not require information from visual input. Multiple answers from the same input data can be handled but with limited success. Perhaps the best test of all for a potential candidate for expert system work is the so-called \"telephone test.\" If you have a problem and you are confident that if you called some known expert in the field, he or she could solve the problem for you in 30 minutes or less over the phone, then the problem is likely to be amenable to an expert system solution. How do expert systems compare with human experts? The popular press has tended to be wildly optimistic about the present state of expert systems development. While many useful expert systems are available, they apply to very limited problem domains. In such domains expert systems can quickly provide answers that are consistent and objective. Expert systems can capture human expertise and make it permanent, widely available and easily portable. However, current expert systems lack the creativity and adaptability expected of a human expert. How do expert systems work? Regardless of the details of the implementation, an expert system is a program driven by an inference engine towards a specific goal. It is, in the limit, a remarkably simple","PeriodicalId":17082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","volume":"93 1","pages":"209 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Systems and Robotics\",\"authors\":\"T. Isenhour, J. C. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.093.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the early sixties, AI researchers attempted to simulate the complicated process of thinking by finding general methods for solving broad classes of problems. This proved too difficult and such attempts failed. In the early seventies the problem was reformulated to include careful attention to data structures but the emphasis was still on general knowledge. Progress was still limited. In the late seventies the problem was further refined to focus almost completely on the knowledge representation. The goal was to make intelligent programs by providing them with high quality, domain-specific knowledge about some limited problem area. This strategy is much like that used by a human expert and gives rise to the term \\\"expert system.\\\" What domains are appropriate for expert system work? First and foremost, for the present state of expert systems technology the problem domain must be of limited scope. A majority of the people within the application field must agree that real experts do exist. The problem must be knowledge, not data, intensive. A problem is knowledge intensive if there is substantial variability in people's ability to solve it. The problem must not require information from visual input. Multiple answers from the same input data can be handled but with limited success. Perhaps the best test of all for a potential candidate for expert system work is the so-called \\\"telephone test.\\\" If you have a problem and you are confident that if you called some known expert in the field, he or she could solve the problem for you in 30 minutes or less over the phone, then the problem is likely to be amenable to an expert system solution. How do expert systems compare with human experts? The popular press has tended to be wildly optimistic about the present state of expert systems development. While many useful expert systems are available, they apply to very limited problem domains. In such domains expert systems can quickly provide answers that are consistent and objective. Expert systems can capture human expertise and make it permanent, widely available and easily portable. However, current expert systems lack the creativity and adaptability expected of a human expert. How do expert systems work? Regardless of the details of the implementation, an expert system is a program driven by an inference engine towards a specific goal. It is, in the limit, a remarkably simple\",\"PeriodicalId\":17082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.093.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在60年代初,人工智能研究人员试图通过寻找解决广泛问题的通用方法来模拟复杂的思维过程。事实证明这太难了,这些尝试都失败了。在70年代早期,这个问题被重新表述,包括对数据结构的仔细关注,但重点仍然是一般知识。进展仍然有限。七十年代末,该问题进一步细化,几乎完全集中在知识表示上。目标是通过向它们提供有关某些有限问题领域的高质量、特定于领域的知识来编写智能程序。这种策略很像人类专家所使用的策略,并由此产生了术语“专家系统”。哪些领域适合专家系统工作?首先,就专家系统技术的现状而言,问题域的范围必须是有限的。应用程序领域的大多数人必须同意真正的专家确实存在。问题必须是知识密集,而不是数据密集。如果人们解决问题的能力有很大的可变性,那么这个问题就是知识密集型的。问题必须不需要来自视觉输入的信息。可以处理来自相同输入数据的多个答案,但成功率有限。对于专家系统工作的潜在候选人来说,也许最好的测试是所谓的“电话测试”。如果您有问题,并且您确信如果您致电该领域的知名专家,他或她可以在30分钟或更短的时间内通过电话为您解决问题,那么该问题可能适合专家系统解决方案。专家系统与人类专家相比如何?大众媒体倾向于对专家系统开发的现状极度乐观。虽然有许多有用的专家系统可用,但它们适用于非常有限的问题领域。在这些领域,专家系统可以快速提供一致和客观的答案。专家系统可以获取人类的专业知识,并使其永久、广泛可用和易于携带。然而,目前的专家系统缺乏人类专家所期望的创造力和适应性。专家系统是如何工作的?无论实现的细节如何,专家系统都是一个由推理引擎驱动的程序,目的是实现特定的目标。在极限情况下,它非常简单
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Systems and Robotics
In the early sixties, AI researchers attempted to simulate the complicated process of thinking by finding general methods for solving broad classes of problems. This proved too difficult and such attempts failed. In the early seventies the problem was reformulated to include careful attention to data structures but the emphasis was still on general knowledge. Progress was still limited. In the late seventies the problem was further refined to focus almost completely on the knowledge representation. The goal was to make intelligent programs by providing them with high quality, domain-specific knowledge about some limited problem area. This strategy is much like that used by a human expert and gives rise to the term "expert system." What domains are appropriate for expert system work? First and foremost, for the present state of expert systems technology the problem domain must be of limited scope. A majority of the people within the application field must agree that real experts do exist. The problem must be knowledge, not data, intensive. A problem is knowledge intensive if there is substantial variability in people's ability to solve it. The problem must not require information from visual input. Multiple answers from the same input data can be handled but with limited success. Perhaps the best test of all for a potential candidate for expert system work is the so-called "telephone test." If you have a problem and you are confident that if you called some known expert in the field, he or she could solve the problem for you in 30 minutes or less over the phone, then the problem is likely to be amenable to an expert system solution. How do expert systems compare with human experts? The popular press has tended to be wildly optimistic about the present state of expert systems development. While many useful expert systems are available, they apply to very limited problem domains. In such domains expert systems can quickly provide answers that are consistent and objective. Expert systems can capture human expertise and make it permanent, widely available and easily portable. However, current expert systems lack the creativity and adaptability expected of a human expert. How do expert systems work? Regardless of the details of the implementation, an expert system is a program driven by an inference engine towards a specific goal. It is, in the limit, a remarkably simple
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信