保罗支持性，反对欲望的立场

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS

Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7445/67--1046

J. Punt

{"title":"保罗支持性，反对欲望的立场","authors":"J. Punt","doi":"10.7445/67--1046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the New Testament, Paul’s letters are characterised by an uneasiness with desire far more than with sex. Traditionally, this distinction is not made, and concerns with ἐπιθυμία (desire) and πορνεία (sexual immorality) are often explained by an appeal to eschatology. Contemporary gender patterns constitute a more appropriate heuristic framework for Paul’s utilitarian and at times positive understanding of sex, compared to his consistent resistance to desire. Examples are offered of Paul’s anti-desire, pro-sex stance.","PeriodicalId":40864,"journal":{"name":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PAUL’S PRO-SEX ANTI-DESIRE STANCE\",\"authors\":\"J. Punt\",\"doi\":\"10.7445/67--1046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the New Testament, Paul’s letters are characterised by an uneasiness with desire far more than with sex. Traditionally, this distinction is not made, and concerns with ἐπιθυμία (desire) and πορνεία (sexual immorality) are often explained by an appeal to eschatology. Contemporary gender patterns constitute a more appropriate heuristic framework for Paul’s utilitarian and at times positive understanding of sex, compared to his consistent resistance to desire. Examples are offered of Paul’s anti-desire, pro-sex stance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7445/67--1046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7445/67--1046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在新约中，保罗书信的特点是对欲望的不安远远超过对性的不安。传统上，这种区分是不存在的，关于πιθ θ ο μ末梢α(欲望)和πορνε末梢α(性不道德)的关系经常被解释为诉诸末世论。与保罗一贯抵制欲望相比，当代的性别模式构成了一个更合适的启发式框架，让他对性有了功利主义的理解，有时是积极的理解。保罗的反欲望，亲性立场的例子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

PAUL’S PRO-SEX ANTI-DESIRE STANCE

In the New Testament, Paul’s letters are characterised by an uneasiness with desire far more than with sex. Traditionally, this distinction is not made, and concerns with ἐπιθυμία (desire) and πορνεία (sexual immorality) are often explained by an appeal to eschatology. Contemporary gender patterns constitute a more appropriate heuristic framework for Paul’s utilitarian and at times positive understanding of sex, compared to his consistent resistance to desire. Examples are offered of Paul’s anti-desire, pro-sex stance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks