卡萨随笔——《三宫》中的自我讽刺

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS

Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa Pub Date : 2015-02-26 DOI:10.7445/59-0-949

C. Bronkhorst

{"title":"卡萨随笔——《三宫》中的自我讽刺","authors":"C. Bronkhorst","doi":"10.7445/59-0-949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern reader of the Cena Trimalchionis, seeing the episode grouped under the larger title Satyrica, could hardly be blamed for assuming a priori that Petronius had written a satirical work. Yet, in making this assumption, the reader overlooks a question central to the debate over the interpretation of Petronius' work: 'Can the Cena be read as a moralising or satirical work?'","PeriodicalId":40864,"journal":{"name":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","volume":"59 1","pages":"141-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CASA ESSAY - SELF-SATIRE IN THE CENA TRIMALCHIONIS\",\"authors\":\"C. Bronkhorst\",\"doi\":\"10.7445/59-0-949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern reader of the Cena Trimalchionis, seeing the episode grouped under the larger title Satyrica, could hardly be blamed for assuming a priori that Petronius had written a satirical work. Yet, in making this assumption, the reader overlooks a question central to the debate over the interpretation of Petronius' work: 'Can the Cena be read as a moralising or satirical work?'\",\"PeriodicalId\":40864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"141-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7445/59-0-949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7445/59-0-949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

《西纳·特里马基奥尼斯》的现代读者，看到这一章节被归入更大的标题《萨提里卡》，很难责怪他们先验地认为佩特罗尼乌斯写的是一部讽刺作品。然而，在做出这样的假设时，读者忽视了一个在解读佩特罗尼乌斯作品时争论的核心问题:“《锡纳》可以被解读为一部道德或讽刺作品吗?”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

CASA ESSAY - SELF-SATIRE IN THE CENA TRIMALCHIONIS

The modern reader of the Cena Trimalchionis, seeing the episode grouped under the larger title Satyrica, could hardly be blamed for assuming a priori that Petronius had written a satirical work. Yet, in making this assumption, the reader overlooks a question central to the debate over the interpretation of Petronius' work: 'Can the Cena be read as a moralising or satirical work?'

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks