{"title":"基督教牧首与欧里庇德牧首之比较分析","authors":"G. Swart","doi":"10.7445/41-1-2-217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Christus patiens is a dramatic representation of the Passion of Christ, in which\nthe literary conventions of classical tragedy, and especially the style and diction of\nEuripides, are extensively copied. In the printed tradition, it is generally described\nas a tragedy.l However, the defInition iJ1r668qt~ apaJ.ta1'tlC~ ('dramatic plot'), which\noccurs frequently in the manuscript tradition, seems to give a more accurate\ndescription of the nature of this poem. It is traditionally attributed to Gregory of\nNazianzus, but its authenticity has been disputed by many scholars since the late\nsixteenth century. 2 Even after the detailed defence of the attribution to Gregory by\nTullier (1969:11-74), many dissenting voices still remain. The present author (Swart\n1990) regards the authorship of Gregory as probable, though not irrefutably proven,\nwhile the date of composition must be considered to be much earlier than the\neleventh to twelfth century as suggested by some scholars. External evidence\nstrongly suggests that the poem was composed before the sixth century. Thus it is a\nproduct of the early Byzantine period, and as such an interesting example of the way\nin which literary practices of Classical Antiquity were imitated by the Byzantines.","PeriodicalId":40864,"journal":{"name":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROWGUE OF THE CHRISTUS PAT/ENSAND EURIPIDEAN PROWGUESA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"G. Swart\",\"doi\":\"10.7445/41-1-2-217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Christus patiens is a dramatic representation of the Passion of Christ, in which\\nthe literary conventions of classical tragedy, and especially the style and diction of\\nEuripides, are extensively copied. In the printed tradition, it is generally described\\nas a tragedy.l However, the defInition iJ1r668qt~ apaJ.ta1'tlC~ ('dramatic plot'), which\\noccurs frequently in the manuscript tradition, seems to give a more accurate\\ndescription of the nature of this poem. It is traditionally attributed to Gregory of\\nNazianzus, but its authenticity has been disputed by many scholars since the late\\nsixteenth century. 2 Even after the detailed defence of the attribution to Gregory by\\nTullier (1969:11-74), many dissenting voices still remain. The present author (Swart\\n1990) regards the authorship of Gregory as probable, though not irrefutably proven,\\nwhile the date of composition must be considered to be much earlier than the\\neleventh to twelfth century as suggested by some scholars. External evidence\\nstrongly suggests that the poem was composed before the sixth century. Thus it is a\\nproduct of the early Byzantine period, and as such an interesting example of the way\\nin which literary practices of Classical Antiquity were imitated by the Byzantines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7445/41-1-2-217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7445/41-1-2-217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE PROWGUE OF THE CHRISTUS PAT/ENSAND EURIPIDEAN PROWGUESA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
The Christus patiens is a dramatic representation of the Passion of Christ, in which
the literary conventions of classical tragedy, and especially the style and diction of
Euripides, are extensively copied. In the printed tradition, it is generally described
as a tragedy.l However, the defInition iJ1r668qt~ apaJ.ta1'tlC~ ('dramatic plot'), which
occurs frequently in the manuscript tradition, seems to give a more accurate
description of the nature of this poem. It is traditionally attributed to Gregory of
Nazianzus, but its authenticity has been disputed by many scholars since the late
sixteenth century. 2 Even after the detailed defence of the attribution to Gregory by
Tullier (1969:11-74), many dissenting voices still remain. The present author (Swart
1990) regards the authorship of Gregory as probable, though not irrefutably proven,
while the date of composition must be considered to be much earlier than the
eleventh to twelfth century as suggested by some scholars. External evidence
strongly suggests that the poem was composed before the sixth century. Thus it is a
product of the early Byzantine period, and as such an interesting example of the way
in which literary practices of Classical Antiquity were imitated by the Byzantines.