J. Ray, D. Cichowski, Martin‐Hugues St‐Laurent, Chris J. Johnson, S. Petersen, I. Thompson
{"title":"加拿大西部山区驯鹿的保护现状:2002-2014年濒危物种法案下的保护","authors":"J. Ray, D. Cichowski, Martin‐Hugues St‐Laurent, Chris J. Johnson, S. Petersen, I. Thompson","doi":"10.7557/2.35.2.3647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In April 2014, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) reviewed the status of caribou in the western mountains of Canada, in keeping with the ten-year reassessment mandate under the Species at Risk Act. Assessed as two ‘nationally significant’ populations in 2002, COSEWIC revised the conservation units for all caribou in Canada, recognising eleven extant Designatable Units (DUs), three of which -- Northern Mountain, Central Mountain, and Southern Mountain -- are found only in western Canada. The 2014 assessment concluded that the condition of many subpopulations in all three DUs had deteriorated. As a result of small and declining population sizes, the Central Mountain and Southern Mountain DUs are now recognised as endangered. Recent declines in a number of Northern Mountain DU subpopulations did not meet thresholds for endangered or threatened, and were assessed as of special concern. Since the passage of the federal Species at Risk Act in 2002, considerable areas of habitat were managed or conserved for caribou, although disturbance from cumulative human development activities has increased during the same period. Government agencies and local First Nations are attempting to arrest the steep decline of some subpopulations by using predator control, maternal penning, population augmentation, and captive breeding. Based on declines, future developments and current recovery effects, we offer the following recommendations: 1) where recovery actions are necessary, commit to simultaneously reducing human intrusion into caribou ranges, restoring habitat over the long term, and conducting short-term predator control, 2) carefully consider COSEWIC’s new DU structure for management and recovery actions, especially regarding translocations, 3) carry out regular surveys to monitor the condition of Northern Mountain caribou subpopulations and immediately implement preventative measures where necessary, and 4) undertake a proactive, planned approach coordinated across jurisdictions to conserve landscape processes important to caribou conservation.","PeriodicalId":30034,"journal":{"name":"Rangifer","volume":"35 1","pages":"49-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation status of caribou in the western mountains of Canada: Protections under the species at risk act, 2002-2014\",\"authors\":\"J. Ray, D. Cichowski, Martin‐Hugues St‐Laurent, Chris J. Johnson, S. Petersen, I. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.7557/2.35.2.3647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In April 2014, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) reviewed the status of caribou in the western mountains of Canada, in keeping with the ten-year reassessment mandate under the Species at Risk Act. Assessed as two ‘nationally significant’ populations in 2002, COSEWIC revised the conservation units for all caribou in Canada, recognising eleven extant Designatable Units (DUs), three of which -- Northern Mountain, Central Mountain, and Southern Mountain -- are found only in western Canada. The 2014 assessment concluded that the condition of many subpopulations in all three DUs had deteriorated. As a result of small and declining population sizes, the Central Mountain and Southern Mountain DUs are now recognised as endangered. Recent declines in a number of Northern Mountain DU subpopulations did not meet thresholds for endangered or threatened, and were assessed as of special concern. Since the passage of the federal Species at Risk Act in 2002, considerable areas of habitat were managed or conserved for caribou, although disturbance from cumulative human development activities has increased during the same period. Government agencies and local First Nations are attempting to arrest the steep decline of some subpopulations by using predator control, maternal penning, population augmentation, and captive breeding. Based on declines, future developments and current recovery effects, we offer the following recommendations: 1) where recovery actions are necessary, commit to simultaneously reducing human intrusion into caribou ranges, restoring habitat over the long term, and conducting short-term predator control, 2) carefully consider COSEWIC’s new DU structure for management and recovery actions, especially regarding translocations, 3) carry out regular surveys to monitor the condition of Northern Mountain caribou subpopulations and immediately implement preventative measures where necessary, and 4) undertake a proactive, planned approach coordinated across jurisdictions to conserve landscape processes important to caribou conservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangifer\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"49-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangifer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7557/2.35.2.3647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangifer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/2.35.2.3647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
2014年4月,加拿大濒危野生动物状况委员会(COSEWIC)根据《濒危物种法》(Species at Risk Act)的十年重新评估任务,审查了加拿大西部山区驯鹿的状况。COSEWIC在2002年被评估为两个“全国重要”种群,修订了加拿大所有驯鹿的保护单位,承认了11个现存的可指定单位(DUs),其中三个-北部山区,中部山区和南部山区-仅在加拿大西部发现。2014年评估的结论是,所有三个DUs的许多亚种群的状况都有所恶化。由于种群数量少且不断减少,中央山和南部山的野牛现已被认定为濒危物种。最近一些北部山区DU亚群的下降没有达到濒危或受威胁的阈值,被评估为特别令人关注。自2002年联邦濒危物种法案通过以来,尽管人类开发活动对驯鹿的干扰在同一时期有所增加,但相当大的栖息地区域得到了管理或保护。政府机构和当地原住民正试图通过控制捕食者、母系围栏、增加种群数量和圈养繁殖来阻止某些亚种群的急剧下降。根据下降、未来发展和当前复苏的影响,我们提出以下建议:1)在需要采取恢复行动的地方,承诺同时减少人类对北美驯鹿范围的入侵,长期恢复栖息地,并进行短期捕食者控制;2)仔细考虑COSEWIC的新DU结构,以管理和恢复行动,特别是关于易位;3)定期进行调查,监测北部山地驯鹿亚群的状况,并在必要时立即采取预防措施。4)采取积极的、有计划的方法,跨司法管辖区协调,保护对北美驯鹿保护重要的景观过程。
Conservation status of caribou in the western mountains of Canada: Protections under the species at risk act, 2002-2014
In April 2014, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) reviewed the status of caribou in the western mountains of Canada, in keeping with the ten-year reassessment mandate under the Species at Risk Act. Assessed as two ‘nationally significant’ populations in 2002, COSEWIC revised the conservation units for all caribou in Canada, recognising eleven extant Designatable Units (DUs), three of which -- Northern Mountain, Central Mountain, and Southern Mountain -- are found only in western Canada. The 2014 assessment concluded that the condition of many subpopulations in all three DUs had deteriorated. As a result of small and declining population sizes, the Central Mountain and Southern Mountain DUs are now recognised as endangered. Recent declines in a number of Northern Mountain DU subpopulations did not meet thresholds for endangered or threatened, and were assessed as of special concern. Since the passage of the federal Species at Risk Act in 2002, considerable areas of habitat were managed or conserved for caribou, although disturbance from cumulative human development activities has increased during the same period. Government agencies and local First Nations are attempting to arrest the steep decline of some subpopulations by using predator control, maternal penning, population augmentation, and captive breeding. Based on declines, future developments and current recovery effects, we offer the following recommendations: 1) where recovery actions are necessary, commit to simultaneously reducing human intrusion into caribou ranges, restoring habitat over the long term, and conducting short-term predator control, 2) carefully consider COSEWIC’s new DU structure for management and recovery actions, especially regarding translocations, 3) carry out regular surveys to monitor the condition of Northern Mountain caribou subpopulations and immediately implement preventative measures where necessary, and 4) undertake a proactive, planned approach coordinated across jurisdictions to conserve landscape processes important to caribou conservation.