{"title":"TACITUS IS ANNALES I.1:叙事分析","authors":"A. Kotzé","doi":"10.7445/38-1-553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 INLEIDEND\nOat Tacitus se geskiedskrywing behoort tot 'n eiesoortige letterkundige genre wat optimaal\naan die hand van liter~re metodes ondersoek kan word, is 'n feit wat toenemend deur\nklassici as onomstrede aanvaar word. Opmerkings soos die deur Wellesley (1987:450) toon\negter dat die navorser wat Tacitus se Annales suiwer liter~r wil benader, steeds sy\ninvalshoek en werkwyse moet verdedig of ten minste duidelik moet omskryf:\nIt must be questioned whether at this date the purely literary critic\nsuch as Aubrion can contribute greatly to a better understanding\nof Tacitus as historian.\n(Wellesley 1987:450)","PeriodicalId":40864,"journal":{"name":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","volume":"6 1","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TACITUS SE ANNALES I.1: 'N NARRATOLOGIESE ANALISE\",\"authors\":\"A. Kotzé\",\"doi\":\"10.7445/38-1-553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 INLEIDEND\\nOat Tacitus se geskiedskrywing behoort tot 'n eiesoortige letterkundige genre wat optimaal\\naan die hand van liter~re metodes ondersoek kan word, is 'n feit wat toenemend deur\\nklassici as onomstrede aanvaar word. Opmerkings soos die deur Wellesley (1987:450) toon\\negter dat die navorser wat Tacitus se Annales suiwer liter~r wil benader, steeds sy\\ninvalshoek en werkwyse moet verdedig of ten minste duidelik moet omskryf:\\nIt must be questioned whether at this date the purely literary critic\\nsuch as Aubrion can contribute greatly to a better understanding\\nof Tacitus as historian.\\n(Wellesley 1987:450)\",\"PeriodicalId\":40864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"19-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7445/38-1-553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akroterion-Journal for the Classics in South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7445/38-1-553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
1 INLEIDEND
Oat Tacitus se geskiedskrywing behoort tot 'n eiesoortige letterkundige genre wat optimaal
aan die hand van liter~re metodes ondersoek kan word, is 'n feit wat toenemend deur
klassici as onomstrede aanvaar word. Opmerkings soos die deur Wellesley (1987:450) toon
egter dat die navorser wat Tacitus se Annales suiwer liter~r wil benader, steeds sy
invalshoek en werkwyse moet verdedig of ten minste duidelik moet omskryf:
It must be questioned whether at this date the purely literary critic
such as Aubrion can contribute greatly to a better understanding
of Tacitus as historian.
(Wellesley 1987:450)