教师在综合整体能力方面使用STEAM教育方法的初级课程经验

Irma Spiriajevienė, Giedrė Tumosienė, Jūratė Lastauskienė
{"title":"教师在综合整体能力方面使用STEAM教育方法的初级课程经验","authors":"Irma Spiriajevienė, Giedrė Tumosienė, Jūratė Lastauskienė","doi":"10.59476/mtt.v1i19.584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After analysing literature sources, the article discusses the STEAM educational approach and its application in primary education. The concept of teachers’ competencies and the significance, structure, and levels of integrated and holistic competencies are analysed. The guidelines for training primary school teachers, the importance of cooperation of higher education institutions with practitioners applying the STEAM educational approach, and the relevance of curriculum improvement are discussed. 18 Lithuanian and foreign educators using the STEAM educational approach participated in a scientific focus group interview study. Having obtained the content analysis data, teachers’ experiences were analysed, and competencies were identified. Educators’ competencies were analysed based on the STEAM fields: science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics. The applicability of the STEAM areas in the educational process and other experiences of using the STEAM educational approach were identified. Using content analysis, the following categories were identified: the STEAM activities in education institutions (23 statements), General competencies in the STEAM (17 statements), Subject-specific competencies in the STEAM (11 statements), Most needed competencies (8 statements), Use of science in the STEAM (17 statements), Use of technology in the STEAM (21 statements), Use of Engineering in the STEAM (11 statements), Use of Arts and Culture in the STEAM (19 statements), Use of Mathematics in the STEAM (16 statements). The discussion of the participants in the study focuses on the following main sub-categories: Information Technology (11 statements), Creativity (9 statements), Application of knowledge in mathematics (7 statements), Project development (5 statements), Practical research (5 statements), Sharing of best practices (5 statements), New technologies and information management (4 statements), Design and construction (11 statements), Painting/Drawing (6 statements), Playing music (5 statements), and Data processing (6 statements). These main sub-categories reveal primary teachers’ competencies when applying STEAM education in their work. Creativity competence took a special place in the analysis of competencies. It is analysed in the article from integral, multifunctional, and holistic perspectives.","PeriodicalId":32541,"journal":{"name":"Mokslo Taikomieji Tyrimai Lietuvos Kolegijose","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pradinių klasių mokytojų, taikančių STEAM ugdymo metodą, patirtys integruoto-holistinio kompetencijų lygmens požiūriu\",\"authors\":\"Irma Spiriajevienė, Giedrė Tumosienė, Jūratė Lastauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.59476/mtt.v1i19.584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After analysing literature sources, the article discusses the STEAM educational approach and its application in primary education. The concept of teachers’ competencies and the significance, structure, and levels of integrated and holistic competencies are analysed. The guidelines for training primary school teachers, the importance of cooperation of higher education institutions with practitioners applying the STEAM educational approach, and the relevance of curriculum improvement are discussed. 18 Lithuanian and foreign educators using the STEAM educational approach participated in a scientific focus group interview study. Having obtained the content analysis data, teachers’ experiences were analysed, and competencies were identified. Educators’ competencies were analysed based on the STEAM fields: science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics. The applicability of the STEAM areas in the educational process and other experiences of using the STEAM educational approach were identified. Using content analysis, the following categories were identified: the STEAM activities in education institutions (23 statements), General competencies in the STEAM (17 statements), Subject-specific competencies in the STEAM (11 statements), Most needed competencies (8 statements), Use of science in the STEAM (17 statements), Use of technology in the STEAM (21 statements), Use of Engineering in the STEAM (11 statements), Use of Arts and Culture in the STEAM (19 statements), Use of Mathematics in the STEAM (16 statements). The discussion of the participants in the study focuses on the following main sub-categories: Information Technology (11 statements), Creativity (9 statements), Application of knowledge in mathematics (7 statements), Project development (5 statements), Practical research (5 statements), Sharing of best practices (5 statements), New technologies and information management (4 statements), Design and construction (11 statements), Painting/Drawing (6 statements), Playing music (5 statements), and Data processing (6 statements). These main sub-categories reveal primary teachers’ competencies when applying STEAM education in their work. Creativity competence took a special place in the analysis of competencies. It is analysed in the article from integral, multifunctional, and holistic perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mokslo Taikomieji Tyrimai Lietuvos Kolegijose\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mokslo Taikomieji Tyrimai Lietuvos Kolegijose\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt.v1i19.584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mokslo Taikomieji Tyrimai Lietuvos Kolegijose","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt.v1i19.584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在分析文献资料的基础上,探讨了STEAM教学方法及其在小学教育中的应用。分析了教师胜任力的概念、综合胜任力和整体胜任力的意义、结构和层次。讨论了培训小学教师的指导方针,高等教育机构与应用STEAM教育方法的实践者合作的重要性,以及课程改进的相关性。使用STEAM教育方法的18名立陶宛和外国教育工作者参加了一项科学焦点小组访谈研究。在获得内容分析数据后,对教师的经验进行了分析,并确定了教师的能力。教育工作者的能力是基于STEAM领域进行分析的:科学、技术、工程、艺术和数学。确定了STEAM领域在教育过程中的适用性以及使用STEAM教育方法的其他经验。通过内容分析,确定了以下类别:STEAM在教育机构中的活动(23个陈述),STEAM中的一般能力(17个陈述),STEAM中的特定主题能力(11个陈述),最需要的能力(8个陈述),STEAM中科学的使用(17个陈述),STEAM中技术的使用(21个陈述),STEAM中工程的使用(11个陈述),STEAM中艺术和文化的使用(19个陈述),STEAM中数学的使用(16个陈述)。研究参与者的讨论集中在以下主要子类别:信息技术(11条)、创造力(9条)、数学知识应用(7条)、项目开发(5条)、实践研究(5条)、最佳实践分享(5条)、新技术与信息管理(4条)、设计与施工(11条)、绘画/绘图(6条)、音乐演奏(5条)、数据处理(6条)。这些主要的子类别揭示了小学教师在工作中应用STEAM教育的能力。创造性能力在能力分析中占有特殊的地位。本文从整体、多功能和整体的角度对其进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pradinių klasių mokytojų, taikančių STEAM ugdymo metodą, patirtys integruoto-holistinio kompetencijų lygmens požiūriu
After analysing literature sources, the article discusses the STEAM educational approach and its application in primary education. The concept of teachers’ competencies and the significance, structure, and levels of integrated and holistic competencies are analysed. The guidelines for training primary school teachers, the importance of cooperation of higher education institutions with practitioners applying the STEAM educational approach, and the relevance of curriculum improvement are discussed. 18 Lithuanian and foreign educators using the STEAM educational approach participated in a scientific focus group interview study. Having obtained the content analysis data, teachers’ experiences were analysed, and competencies were identified. Educators’ competencies were analysed based on the STEAM fields: science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics. The applicability of the STEAM areas in the educational process and other experiences of using the STEAM educational approach were identified. Using content analysis, the following categories were identified: the STEAM activities in education institutions (23 statements), General competencies in the STEAM (17 statements), Subject-specific competencies in the STEAM (11 statements), Most needed competencies (8 statements), Use of science in the STEAM (17 statements), Use of technology in the STEAM (21 statements), Use of Engineering in the STEAM (11 statements), Use of Arts and Culture in the STEAM (19 statements), Use of Mathematics in the STEAM (16 statements). The discussion of the participants in the study focuses on the following main sub-categories: Information Technology (11 statements), Creativity (9 statements), Application of knowledge in mathematics (7 statements), Project development (5 statements), Practical research (5 statements), Sharing of best practices (5 statements), New technologies and information management (4 statements), Design and construction (11 statements), Painting/Drawing (6 statements), Playing music (5 statements), and Data processing (6 statements). These main sub-categories reveal primary teachers’ competencies when applying STEAM education in their work. Creativity competence took a special place in the analysis of competencies. It is analysed in the article from integral, multifunctional, and holistic perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信