{"title":"利用一般连续性校正因子推导二元响应聚类随机试验的样本量公式,并确定小事件率的最佳设置","authors":"M. John","doi":"10.6339/JDS.2013.11(1).1089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trials for comparing interventions where cluster of subjects, rather than individuals, are randomized, are commonly called cluster randomized trials (CRTs). For comparison of binary outcomes in a CRT, although there are a few published formulations for sample size computation, the most commonly used is the one developed by Donner, Birkett, and Buck (Am J Epidemiol, 1981) probably due to its incorporation in the text book by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (Wiley, 2003). In this paper, we derive a new 2 approximation formula with a general continuity correction factor (c) and show that specially for the scenarios of small event rates (< 0:01), the new formulation recommends lower number of clusters than the Donner et al. formulation thereby providing better eciency. All known formulations can be shown to be special cases at specic value of the general correction factor (e.g., Donner formulation is equivalent to the new formulation for c = 1). Statistical simulation is presented with data on comparative ecacy of the available methods identifying correction factors that are optimal for rare event rates. Table of sample size recommendation for variety of rare event rates along with code in\\R\" language for easy computation of sample size in other settings is also provided. Sample size calculations for a published CRT (\\Pathways to Health study\" that evaluates the value of intervention for smoking cessation) are computed for various correction factors to illustrate that with an optimal choice of the correction factor, the study could have maintained the same power with a 20% less sample size.","PeriodicalId":73699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data science : JDS","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation of Sample Size Formula for Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Responses Using a General Continuity Correction Factor and Identification of Optimal Settings for Small Event Rates\",\"authors\":\"M. John\",\"doi\":\"10.6339/JDS.2013.11(1).1089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trials for comparing interventions where cluster of subjects, rather than individuals, are randomized, are commonly called cluster randomized trials (CRTs). For comparison of binary outcomes in a CRT, although there are a few published formulations for sample size computation, the most commonly used is the one developed by Donner, Birkett, and Buck (Am J Epidemiol, 1981) probably due to its incorporation in the text book by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (Wiley, 2003). In this paper, we derive a new 2 approximation formula with a general continuity correction factor (c) and show that specially for the scenarios of small event rates (< 0:01), the new formulation recommends lower number of clusters than the Donner et al. formulation thereby providing better eciency. All known formulations can be shown to be special cases at specic value of the general correction factor (e.g., Donner formulation is equivalent to the new formulation for c = 1). Statistical simulation is presented with data on comparative ecacy of the available methods identifying correction factors that are optimal for rare event rates. Table of sample size recommendation for variety of rare event rates along with code in\\\\R\\\" language for easy computation of sample size in other settings is also provided. Sample size calculations for a published CRT (\\\\Pathways to Health study\\\" that evaluates the value of intervention for smoking cessation) are computed for various correction factors to illustrate that with an optimal choice of the correction factor, the study could have maintained the same power with a 20% less sample size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of data science : JDS\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of data science : JDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.2013.11(1).1089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data science : JDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6339/JDS.2013.11(1).1089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
比较干预措施的试验是随机分组的,而不是随机分组的个体,通常称为分组随机试验(CRTs)。为了比较CRT中的二进制结果,虽然有一些已发表的样本大小计算公式,但最常用的是Donner, Birkett和Buck (Am J epidemiology, 1981)开发的公式,这可能是因为Fleiss, Levin和Paik (Wiley, 2003)将其纳入了教科书中。在本文中,我们推导了一个具有一般连续性校正因子(c)的新的2近似公式,并表明,特别是对于小事件率(< 0:01)的场景,新公式比Donner等公式推荐的簇数更少,从而提供了更好的效率。所有已知的公式都可以被证明是一般修正因子的特定值的特殊情况(例如,Donner公式相当于c = 1的新公式)。统计模拟提供了关于确定罕见事件率最佳修正因子的可用方法的相对准确性的数据。还提供了各种罕见事件率的样本量建议表以及\R”语言代码,以便在其他设置中轻松计算样本量。为一项已发表的评估戒烟干预价值的CRT (\Pathways to Health study)计算了各种校正因子的样本量,以说明在校正因子的最佳选择下,该研究可以在样本量减少20%的情况下保持相同的功效。
Derivation of Sample Size Formula for Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Responses Using a General Continuity Correction Factor and Identification of Optimal Settings for Small Event Rates
Trials for comparing interventions where cluster of subjects, rather than individuals, are randomized, are commonly called cluster randomized trials (CRTs). For comparison of binary outcomes in a CRT, although there are a few published formulations for sample size computation, the most commonly used is the one developed by Donner, Birkett, and Buck (Am J Epidemiol, 1981) probably due to its incorporation in the text book by Fleiss, Levin, and Paik (Wiley, 2003). In this paper, we derive a new 2 approximation formula with a general continuity correction factor (c) and show that specially for the scenarios of small event rates (< 0:01), the new formulation recommends lower number of clusters than the Donner et al. formulation thereby providing better eciency. All known formulations can be shown to be special cases at specic value of the general correction factor (e.g., Donner formulation is equivalent to the new formulation for c = 1). Statistical simulation is presented with data on comparative ecacy of the available methods identifying correction factors that are optimal for rare event rates. Table of sample size recommendation for variety of rare event rates along with code in\R" language for easy computation of sample size in other settings is also provided. Sample size calculations for a published CRT (\Pathways to Health study" that evaluates the value of intervention for smoking cessation) are computed for various correction factors to illustrate that with an optimal choice of the correction factor, the study could have maintained the same power with a 20% less sample size.