“每一个他们都应该有一个我们”:《梅森与迪克森》和《反对白昼》中权力与抵抗的(几乎)等同。

Q2 Arts and Humanities
G. Maragos
{"title":"“每一个他们都应该有一个我们”:《梅森与迪克森》和《反对白昼》中权力与抵抗的(几乎)等同。","authors":"G. Maragos","doi":"10.7766/ORBIT.V2.2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power and resistance are considered two of Pynchon's principal themes, examined thoroughly by scholars. This presentation will provide an alternative reading of resistance and examine a change in how it is portrayed in Mason & Dixon and Against the Day , where it appears as much more powerful and a potential successor to existent authority, creating a need to reexamine the dichotomy between authority and preterite. In Mason & Dixon there is already a clash between the old and the new regime, religion and science, evident even in the background of the two protagonists; furthermore, the resistance, as is depicted by a nascent movement for American independence, is not a failure; its ideals will metamorphose it into the state tyranny shown in Vineland . In Against the Day , anarchism, albeit ultimately unsuccessful, is presented as an alternative to capitalism and employs similar techniques to those used by the latter, based on the anonymity of its hierarchy and the victimization not only of those outside its network, the never innocent bourgeois, but also the individuals that follow it. The theoretical framework for such an analysis will need to distance itself from an – otherwise useful – marxist approach and move towards Foucault's idea of authority as was expressed in the first volume of The History of Sexuality . Resistance is not external to authority; it is an opponent within the power network, a node through which power can flow. This kind of analysis would not have been possible without Mason & Dixon and Against the Day and the presentation will mostly focus on those two novels.","PeriodicalId":37450,"journal":{"name":"Orbit (Cambridge)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“For every They there ought to be a We”: The (Almost) Equivalence of Power and Resistance in Mason & Dixon and Against the Day.\",\"authors\":\"G. Maragos\",\"doi\":\"10.7766/ORBIT.V2.2.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power and resistance are considered two of Pynchon's principal themes, examined thoroughly by scholars. This presentation will provide an alternative reading of resistance and examine a change in how it is portrayed in Mason & Dixon and Against the Day , where it appears as much more powerful and a potential successor to existent authority, creating a need to reexamine the dichotomy between authority and preterite. In Mason & Dixon there is already a clash between the old and the new regime, religion and science, evident even in the background of the two protagonists; furthermore, the resistance, as is depicted by a nascent movement for American independence, is not a failure; its ideals will metamorphose it into the state tyranny shown in Vineland . In Against the Day , anarchism, albeit ultimately unsuccessful, is presented as an alternative to capitalism and employs similar techniques to those used by the latter, based on the anonymity of its hierarchy and the victimization not only of those outside its network, the never innocent bourgeois, but also the individuals that follow it. The theoretical framework for such an analysis will need to distance itself from an – otherwise useful – marxist approach and move towards Foucault's idea of authority as was expressed in the first volume of The History of Sexuality . Resistance is not external to authority; it is an opponent within the power network, a node through which power can flow. This kind of analysis would not have been possible without Mason & Dixon and Against the Day and the presentation will mostly focus on those two novels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orbit (Cambridge)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orbit (Cambridge)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7766/ORBIT.V2.2.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbit (Cambridge)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7766/ORBIT.V2.2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

权力和抵抗被认为是品钦的两个主要主题,学者们对此进行了深入的研究。本次演讲将提供对抵抗的另一种解读,并研究在梅森和迪克森和反对一天中如何描绘它的变化,在那里它看起来更强大,是现有权威的潜在继承者,创造了重新审视权威和偏好之间二分法的需要。在《梅森与迪克森》中,新旧政权、宗教与科学之间已经存在着冲突,甚至在两位主人公的背景中也很明显;此外,正如新生的美国独立运动所描述的那样,抵抗并非失败;它的理想将把它变成《葡萄园》中所示的国家暴政。在《反对白昼》一书中,无政府主义虽然最终不成功,但却被视为资本主义的替代品,并采用了与资本主义类似的技术,其基础是其等级制度的匿名性,不仅是那些在其网络之外的人,那些从不无辜的资产阶级,而且还有跟随它的个人。这种分析的理论框架需要与马克思主义的方法保持距离,而向福柯在《性史》第一卷中所表达的权威观念靠拢。抵抗并不存在于权威之外;它是电力网络中的一个对手,是电力流动的一个节点。如果没有《梅森与迪克森》和《逆日而行》,这种分析是不可能的,这次演讲将主要集中在这两部小说上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“For every They there ought to be a We”: The (Almost) Equivalence of Power and Resistance in Mason & Dixon and Against the Day.
Power and resistance are considered two of Pynchon's principal themes, examined thoroughly by scholars. This presentation will provide an alternative reading of resistance and examine a change in how it is portrayed in Mason & Dixon and Against the Day , where it appears as much more powerful and a potential successor to existent authority, creating a need to reexamine the dichotomy between authority and preterite. In Mason & Dixon there is already a clash between the old and the new regime, religion and science, evident even in the background of the two protagonists; furthermore, the resistance, as is depicted by a nascent movement for American independence, is not a failure; its ideals will metamorphose it into the state tyranny shown in Vineland . In Against the Day , anarchism, albeit ultimately unsuccessful, is presented as an alternative to capitalism and employs similar techniques to those used by the latter, based on the anonymity of its hierarchy and the victimization not only of those outside its network, the never innocent bourgeois, but also the individuals that follow it. The theoretical framework for such an analysis will need to distance itself from an – otherwise useful – marxist approach and move towards Foucault's idea of authority as was expressed in the first volume of The History of Sexuality . Resistance is not external to authority; it is an opponent within the power network, a node through which power can flow. This kind of analysis would not have been possible without Mason & Dixon and Against the Day and the presentation will mostly focus on those two novels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orbit (Cambridge)
Orbit (Cambridge) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Orbit: Writing Around Pynchon is a journal that publishes high quality, rigorously reviewed and innovative scholarly material on the works of Thomas Pynchon, related authors and adjacent fields in 20th- and 21st-century literature. We publish special and general issues in a rolling format, which brings together a traditional journal article style with the latest publishing technology to ensure faster, yet prestigious, publication for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信