{"title":"与国际史学的比较:十七世纪的转折点","authors":"Maria Antonietta Visceglia","doi":"10.7375/96962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the approaches adopted by Rosario Villari to seventeenthcentury history in the light of his relationships with scholars outside Italy. Villari’s works will be interpreted by consulting his correspondence housed at Fondazione Gramsci. It appears clear that his ideas on the complexity of the seventeenth century developed and matured in close connection with the contemporary international debate, just as it was fostered by intense scholarly and personal exchanges with French, British, American and Spanish historians. We have identified two important points in his career: the late 1960s, when he became interested in the comparative study in Europe of popular rebellions and social relationships in the rural setting; and, later, in the 1980s, when at Princeton his scholarly attention shifted from economic-social topics to political and cultural history. His last work – Un sogno di liberta – reflects this change in a problematic way.","PeriodicalId":44500,"journal":{"name":"STUDI STORICI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison with International Historiography: the Turning Point of the Seventeenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Maria Antonietta Visceglia\",\"doi\":\"10.7375/96962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to examine the approaches adopted by Rosario Villari to seventeenthcentury history in the light of his relationships with scholars outside Italy. Villari’s works will be interpreted by consulting his correspondence housed at Fondazione Gramsci. It appears clear that his ideas on the complexity of the seventeenth century developed and matured in close connection with the contemporary international debate, just as it was fostered by intense scholarly and personal exchanges with French, British, American and Spanish historians. We have identified two important points in his career: the late 1960s, when he became interested in the comparative study in Europe of popular rebellions and social relationships in the rural setting; and, later, in the 1980s, when at Princeton his scholarly attention shifted from economic-social topics to political and cultural history. His last work – Un sogno di liberta – reflects this change in a problematic way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDI STORICI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDI STORICI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7375/96962\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI STORICI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7375/96962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在根据罗萨里奥·维拉里与意大利以外学者的关系,研究他对17世纪历史所采用的方法。维拉里的作品将通过查阅葛兰西基金会收藏的他的信件来解读。很明显,他关于17世纪复杂性的观点是在与法国、英国、美国和西班牙历史学家的激烈学术和个人交流中,与当代国际辩论密切相关而发展和成熟的。我们已经确定了他职业生涯中的两个重要时期:20世纪60年代末,他开始对欧洲农村背景下的民众反叛和社会关系的比较研究感兴趣;后来,在20世纪80年代,当他在普林斯顿大学时,他的学术注意力从经济-社会主题转向了政治和文化史。他的最后一部作品《自由》(Un sogno di liberta)以一种有问题的方式反映了这种变化。
The Comparison with International Historiography: the Turning Point of the Seventeenth Century
This article aims to examine the approaches adopted by Rosario Villari to seventeenthcentury history in the light of his relationships with scholars outside Italy. Villari’s works will be interpreted by consulting his correspondence housed at Fondazione Gramsci. It appears clear that his ideas on the complexity of the seventeenth century developed and matured in close connection with the contemporary international debate, just as it was fostered by intense scholarly and personal exchanges with French, British, American and Spanish historians. We have identified two important points in his career: the late 1960s, when he became interested in the comparative study in Europe of popular rebellions and social relationships in the rural setting; and, later, in the 1980s, when at Princeton his scholarly attention shifted from economic-social topics to political and cultural history. His last work – Un sogno di liberta – reflects this change in a problematic way.