1型和2型糖尿病患者坚持行为维度的探索性因素研究

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
I. Massano-Cardoso, F. Daniel, Vitor Rodrigues, M. Carvalheiro
{"title":"1型和2型糖尿病患者坚持行为维度的探索性因素研究","authors":"I. Massano-Cardoso, F. Daniel, Vitor Rodrigues, M. Carvalheiro","doi":"10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: The current study sought out to conduct an exploratory factor analysis in order to examine behavioral dimensions associated with adherence in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Additionally, our goal was to test a theoretical model consisting of internal and relational factors. Method: Three hundred and forty-seven patients attending consultations at the Servico de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo of the Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Coimbra and at the Associacao Portuguesa de Diabeticos de Portugal. The self-report instruments were Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, WHOQOL-Bref, Escala de Satisfacao com o Suporte Social, Medida de Adesao aos Tratamentos, Attitudes Towards Doctors and Medicine, Beck Depression Inventory, Diabetes Health Profile e Questionario de Autocuidados da Diabetes. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the instrument's dimensionality with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett’s Sphericity Test. Results: For type 1 DM the factor structure found included six components with a total explained variance of 70.8%. For type 2 DM (insulin treatment) seven components were found explaining a total variance of 74.9%.  For type 2 diabetes (oral treatment) six factors accounting for 73.4% of the total explained variance were found. Conclusions: The highest component loadings were found in constructs that should theoretically belong to the corresponding factors. In the case of type 1 DM the therapeutic factor disappears, combining the self-care factor, and in the case of type 2 DM (oral), this component emerged as a dimension. A forced two-dimentional factor analysis indicated that social support load in internal factor. These findings led us to reflect on the suitability of the instrument for the assessment of social support, instead of the model itself. An explanation based on the multidimensionality of therapeutic adherence was achieved considering that internal structure and semantics conditioned our results.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"49 1","pages":"41-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estudo Fatorial Exploratório das Dimensões Comportamentais de Adesão em Pessoas com Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 e Tipo 2\",\"authors\":\"I. Massano-Cardoso, F. Daniel, Vitor Rodrigues, M. Carvalheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aim: The current study sought out to conduct an exploratory factor analysis in order to examine behavioral dimensions associated with adherence in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Additionally, our goal was to test a theoretical model consisting of internal and relational factors. Method: Three hundred and forty-seven patients attending consultations at the Servico de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo of the Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Coimbra and at the Associacao Portuguesa de Diabeticos de Portugal. The self-report instruments were Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, WHOQOL-Bref, Escala de Satisfacao com o Suporte Social, Medida de Adesao aos Tratamentos, Attitudes Towards Doctors and Medicine, Beck Depression Inventory, Diabetes Health Profile e Questionario de Autocuidados da Diabetes. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the instrument's dimensionality with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett’s Sphericity Test. Results: For type 1 DM the factor structure found included six components with a total explained variance of 70.8%. For type 2 DM (insulin treatment) seven components were found explaining a total variance of 74.9%.  For type 2 diabetes (oral treatment) six factors accounting for 73.4% of the total explained variance were found. Conclusions: The highest component loadings were found in constructs that should theoretically belong to the corresponding factors. In the case of type 1 DM the therapeutic factor disappears, combining the self-care factor, and in the case of type 2 DM (oral), this component emerged as a dimension. A forced two-dimentional factor analysis indicated that social support load in internal factor. These findings led us to reflect on the suitability of the instrument for the assessment of social support, instead of the model itself. An explanation based on the multidimensionality of therapeutic adherence was achieved considering that internal structure and semantics conditioned our results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"41-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7342/ISMT.RPICS.2017.3.1.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:本研究旨在进行探索性因素分析,以检查与糖尿病(DM)患者依从性相关的行为维度。此外,我们的目标是检验一个由内部因素和关系因素组成的理论模型。方法:在科英布拉大学中心医院内分泌、糖尿病和代谢科和葡萄牙糖尿病协会就诊的347例患者。自我报告工具为Rosenberg自尊量表、WHOQOL-Bref、社会支持满意度量表、治疗媒体、对医生和药物的态度、Beck抑郁量表、糖尿病健康概况和糖尿病自我诊断问卷。探索性因素分析采用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin和Bartlett的球形检验来评估仪器的维度。结果:1型糖尿病的因子结构包括6个成分,总解释方差为70.8%。对于2型糖尿病(胰岛素治疗),7个成分解释总方差为74.9%。对于2型糖尿病(口服治疗),发现6个因素占总解释方差的73.4%。结论:在理论上应该属于相应因素的构念中发现了最高的成分负荷。在1型糖尿病的情况下,治疗因素消失,结合自我护理因素,在2型糖尿病(口服)的情况下,这一成分作为一个维度出现。强迫二维因子分析表明,社会支持负荷为内部因子。这些发现使我们反思评估社会支持的工具的适用性,而不是模型本身。考虑到内部结构和语义制约了我们的结果,基于治疗依从性的多维度的解释得到了实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estudo Fatorial Exploratório das Dimensões Comportamentais de Adesão em Pessoas com Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 e Tipo 2
Background & Aim: The current study sought out to conduct an exploratory factor analysis in order to examine behavioral dimensions associated with adherence in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Additionally, our goal was to test a theoretical model consisting of internal and relational factors. Method: Three hundred and forty-seven patients attending consultations at the Servico de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo of the Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Coimbra and at the Associacao Portuguesa de Diabeticos de Portugal. The self-report instruments were Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, WHOQOL-Bref, Escala de Satisfacao com o Suporte Social, Medida de Adesao aos Tratamentos, Attitudes Towards Doctors and Medicine, Beck Depression Inventory, Diabetes Health Profile e Questionario de Autocuidados da Diabetes. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the instrument's dimensionality with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett’s Sphericity Test. Results: For type 1 DM the factor structure found included six components with a total explained variance of 70.8%. For type 2 DM (insulin treatment) seven components were found explaining a total variance of 74.9%.  For type 2 diabetes (oral treatment) six factors accounting for 73.4% of the total explained variance were found. Conclusions: The highest component loadings were found in constructs that should theoretically belong to the corresponding factors. In the case of type 1 DM the therapeutic factor disappears, combining the self-care factor, and in the case of type 2 DM (oral), this component emerged as a dimension. A forced two-dimentional factor analysis indicated that social support load in internal factor. These findings led us to reflect on the suitability of the instrument for the assessment of social support, instead of the model itself. An explanation based on the multidimensionality of therapeutic adherence was achieved considering that internal structure and semantics conditioned our results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信