爱情天真和国家爱与政治:政治理论可以从电影上学到什么

P. Kahn
{"title":"爱情天真和国家爱与政治:政治理论可以从电影上学到什么","authors":"P. Kahn","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article illuminates the puzzling gap between political theory and political imagination. Theory is dominated by liberalism and its insistence on interests, reason, rights, individualism, and the social contract. Movies - and the social imaginations of the political they mirror - turn out to be completely different: Instead of interests, we find love, instead of the contract, we find sacrifice, and instead of the individual, we find the family. Turning to film therefore reveals liberal theory to suffer from a failure of the imagination.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"57-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liebe, Unschuld und der Staat. Liebe und Politik: Was die politische Theorie vom Kino lernen kann\",\"authors\":\"P. Kahn\",\"doi\":\"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article illuminates the puzzling gap between political theory and political imagination. Theory is dominated by liberalism and its insistence on interests, reason, rights, individualism, and the social contract. Movies - and the social imaginations of the political they mirror - turn out to be completely different: Instead of interests, we find love, instead of the contract, we find sacrifice, and instead of the individual, we find the family. Turning to film therefore reveals liberal theory to suffer from a failure of the imagination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"57-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文阐明了政治理论与政治想象之间令人困惑的鸿沟。理论以自由主义及其对利益、理性、权利、个人主义和社会契约的坚持为主导。电影——以及它们所反映的政治的社会想象——结果是完全不同的:我们找到的不是利益,而是爱;我们找到的不是契约,而是牺牲;我们找到的不是个人,而是家庭。因此,转向电影揭示了自由主义理论遭受想象力的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liebe, Unschuld und der Staat. Liebe und Politik: Was die politische Theorie vom Kino lernen kann
This article illuminates the puzzling gap between political theory and political imagination. Theory is dominated by liberalism and its insistence on interests, reason, rights, individualism, and the social contract. Movies - and the social imaginations of the political they mirror - turn out to be completely different: Instead of interests, we find love, instead of the contract, we find sacrifice, and instead of the individual, we find the family. Turning to film therefore reveals liberal theory to suffer from a failure of the imagination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信