J. Prajapati, D. Singh, Pramila Ramawat, Nilesh Jain
{"title":"治疗性低温治疗的窒息新生儿的早期神经发育结局:一项非随机队列研究","authors":"J. Prajapati, D. Singh, Pramila Ramawat, Nilesh Jain","doi":"10.7860/ijnmr/2022/55116.2363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) is now a proven model of treatment to prevent complications in asphyxiated newborns. Perinatal asphyxia is the leading cause of mortality and disability in India and developing countries. The TH is still not the standard treatment protocol in developing India, and data regarding early neurological outcomes after TH is lacking. Aim: To evaluate the early neurological outcome at 3, 6, and 9 months of asphyxiated newborns who received TH compared to non recipients. Materials and Methods: This was a non randomised cohort study conducted at the tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 190 asphyxiated newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) within 24 hours of life, meeting the laboratory and/ or clinical criteria of perinatal asphyxia were enrolled. Eligible newborns admitted within 6 hours of birth receiving TH were labelled as recipients, and those who received standard care were labelled as non-recipients. Neonates were assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months and compared for neurodevelopment using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) optimality score and Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Both groups were compared using t-test and chi-square test. Results: Out of the total 190 enrolled participants, 14 were excluded and 176 newborns were further divided into recipients and non recipients groups. Baseline demographic characters were similar in both groups. Seventy-five recipients were followed up till three months, 72 at six months, and 69 at nine months vs 62, 60, and 56 non recipients, respectively. Lesser number of recipients scored suboptimal scores (HINE score <67) at 3 months vs non recipients (20% vs 35.4%, mean/ SD 63 [3.43] vs 57 [4.55], [p<0.001]). At six months (HINE score<70), the incidence was 18% vs 21% (p=0.02), mean score 67 vs 61 (p<0.0001); and at 9 months (HINE score<73) the incidence was 14.4% vs 30.3% (p=0.048), mean score 72 vs 65 among recipient vs non recipients (p<0.0001). Recipients also had less incidence of severe disability (HINE score< 40) at 6 (8.3%vs 21.6% p<0.02), and 9 months (8.3% vs. 19.6%, p<0.04) as compared to non recipients. More recipients had a normal developmental screening at 3,6, and 9 months on the DDST scale. Recipients required fewer anti-epileptics at 3 and 6 months (3 vs 11) as compared to non recipients (p<0.05). Mortality was also less in recipients (7.8% vs 20.9%, p<0.05) as compared to non recipients. Conclusion: There was a significant developmental and neurological improvement with decreased mortality, less episode of seizures, reduction in the need for antiepileptic among recipients of TH compared to non recipients at 3, 6, and 9 months of age.","PeriodicalId":31116,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Asphyxiated Newborns Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Non Randomised Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Prajapati, D. Singh, Pramila Ramawat, Nilesh Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijnmr/2022/55116.2363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) is now a proven model of treatment to prevent complications in asphyxiated newborns. Perinatal asphyxia is the leading cause of mortality and disability in India and developing countries. The TH is still not the standard treatment protocol in developing India, and data regarding early neurological outcomes after TH is lacking. Aim: To evaluate the early neurological outcome at 3, 6, and 9 months of asphyxiated newborns who received TH compared to non recipients. Materials and Methods: This was a non randomised cohort study conducted at the tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 190 asphyxiated newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) within 24 hours of life, meeting the laboratory and/ or clinical criteria of perinatal asphyxia were enrolled. Eligible newborns admitted within 6 hours of birth receiving TH were labelled as recipients, and those who received standard care were labelled as non-recipients. Neonates were assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months and compared for neurodevelopment using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) optimality score and Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Both groups were compared using t-test and chi-square test. Results: Out of the total 190 enrolled participants, 14 were excluded and 176 newborns were further divided into recipients and non recipients groups. Baseline demographic characters were similar in both groups. Seventy-five recipients were followed up till three months, 72 at six months, and 69 at nine months vs 62, 60, and 56 non recipients, respectively. Lesser number of recipients scored suboptimal scores (HINE score <67) at 3 months vs non recipients (20% vs 35.4%, mean/ SD 63 [3.43] vs 57 [4.55], [p<0.001]). At six months (HINE score<70), the incidence was 18% vs 21% (p=0.02), mean score 67 vs 61 (p<0.0001); and at 9 months (HINE score<73) the incidence was 14.4% vs 30.3% (p=0.048), mean score 72 vs 65 among recipient vs non recipients (p<0.0001). Recipients also had less incidence of severe disability (HINE score< 40) at 6 (8.3%vs 21.6% p<0.02), and 9 months (8.3% vs. 19.6%, p<0.04) as compared to non recipients. More recipients had a normal developmental screening at 3,6, and 9 months on the DDST scale. Recipients required fewer anti-epileptics at 3 and 6 months (3 vs 11) as compared to non recipients (p<0.05). Mortality was also less in recipients (7.8% vs 20.9%, p<0.05) as compared to non recipients. Conclusion: There was a significant developmental and neurological improvement with decreased mortality, less episode of seizures, reduction in the need for antiepileptic among recipients of TH compared to non recipients at 3, 6, and 9 months of age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2022/55116.2363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2022/55116.2363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导论:治疗性低温(TH)现在是一种经过验证的治疗模式,以防止窒息新生儿的并发症。围产期窒息是印度和发展中国家死亡和残疾的主要原因。在发展中国家的印度,青蒿素仍不是标准的治疗方案,而且缺乏关于青蒿素后早期神经预后的数据。目的:评价在3、6和9个月时接受TH治疗的窒息新生儿与未接受TH治疗的新生儿的早期神经预后。材料和方法:这是一项在三级护理教学医院进行的非随机队列研究。在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)生活24小时内,符合围产期窒息的实验室和/或临床标准的190例窒息新生儿被纳入研究。在出生后6小时内接受TH治疗的合格新生儿被标记为接受者,而接受标准治疗的新生儿被标记为非接受者。在3、6和9个月时对新生儿进行评估,并使用哈默史密斯婴儿神经系统检查(HINE)最佳评分和丹佛发育筛查试验II比较神经发育。两组比较采用t检验和卡方检验。结果:在总共190名参与者中,14名被排除,176名新生儿进一步分为接受者组和非接受者组。两组的基线人口统计学特征相似。75名接受者随访至3个月,72名随访至6个月,69名随访至9个月,而非接受者分别为62名、60名和56名。在3个月时,与非接受者相比,较少的接受者获得次优评分(HINE评分<67)(20% vs 35.4%, mean/ SD为63 [3.43]vs 57 [4.55], [p<0.001])。6个月时(HINE评分<70),发生率为18% vs 21% (p=0.02),平均评分67 vs 61 (p<0.0001);9个月时(HINE评分<73)发生率分别为14.4%和30.3% (p=0.048),受体和非受体的平均评分分别为72和65 (p<0.0001)。与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受治疗的患者在6个月时(8.3%对21.6% p<0.02)和9个月时(8.3%对19.6%,p<0.04)严重残疾的发生率也较低(HINE评分< 40)。更多的接受者在3、6和9个月的DDST量表上进行了正常的发育筛查。与非受体相比,受体在3个月和6个月时需要更少的抗癫痫药物(3 vs 11) (p<0.05)。与非接受者相比,接受者的死亡率也更低(7.8% vs 20.9%, p<0.05)。结论:在3、6和9月龄时,与未接受TH治疗的儿童相比,接受TH治疗的儿童在发育和神经系统方面有显著改善,死亡率降低,癫痫发作次数减少,抗癫痫药物需求减少。
Early Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Asphyxiated Newborns Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Non Randomised Cohort Study
Introduction: Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) is now a proven model of treatment to prevent complications in asphyxiated newborns. Perinatal asphyxia is the leading cause of mortality and disability in India and developing countries. The TH is still not the standard treatment protocol in developing India, and data regarding early neurological outcomes after TH is lacking. Aim: To evaluate the early neurological outcome at 3, 6, and 9 months of asphyxiated newborns who received TH compared to non recipients. Materials and Methods: This was a non randomised cohort study conducted at the tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 190 asphyxiated newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) within 24 hours of life, meeting the laboratory and/ or clinical criteria of perinatal asphyxia were enrolled. Eligible newborns admitted within 6 hours of birth receiving TH were labelled as recipients, and those who received standard care were labelled as non-recipients. Neonates were assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months and compared for neurodevelopment using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) optimality score and Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Both groups were compared using t-test and chi-square test. Results: Out of the total 190 enrolled participants, 14 were excluded and 176 newborns were further divided into recipients and non recipients groups. Baseline demographic characters were similar in both groups. Seventy-five recipients were followed up till three months, 72 at six months, and 69 at nine months vs 62, 60, and 56 non recipients, respectively. Lesser number of recipients scored suboptimal scores (HINE score <67) at 3 months vs non recipients (20% vs 35.4%, mean/ SD 63 [3.43] vs 57 [4.55], [p<0.001]). At six months (HINE score<70), the incidence was 18% vs 21% (p=0.02), mean score 67 vs 61 (p<0.0001); and at 9 months (HINE score<73) the incidence was 14.4% vs 30.3% (p=0.048), mean score 72 vs 65 among recipient vs non recipients (p<0.0001). Recipients also had less incidence of severe disability (HINE score< 40) at 6 (8.3%vs 21.6% p<0.02), and 9 months (8.3% vs. 19.6%, p<0.04) as compared to non recipients. More recipients had a normal developmental screening at 3,6, and 9 months on the DDST scale. Recipients required fewer anti-epileptics at 3 and 6 months (3 vs 11) as compared to non recipients (p<0.05). Mortality was also less in recipients (7.8% vs 20.9%, p<0.05) as compared to non recipients. Conclusion: There was a significant developmental and neurological improvement with decreased mortality, less episode of seizures, reduction in the need for antiepileptic among recipients of TH compared to non recipients at 3, 6, and 9 months of age.