解剖教学中的小组讨论与传统讲座:横断面研究

R. Jaiswal
{"title":"解剖教学中的小组讨论与传统讲座:横断面研究","authors":"R. Jaiswal","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/61027.2893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: All educational institutions follow different types of teaching and learning methods to deliver knowledge to the students. The conventional teaching methodology is commonly used in many educational institutions. Small group discussion (SGD) aids in improving the basic skills required for every task i.e., communication skills. Enthusiastic participation help in creating a dynamic and lively environment for the progress of participants. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Small group discussion (SGD) over traditional lectures and to assess the perception of students regarding SGD versus traditional lectures. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with MBBS Phase-I medical students from November 2019 to April 2020 in Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. About 150 MBBS Phase-I medical students were divided into 2 groups, A and B, 75 students per group. Group-A (Roll Number 1 to 75) was taken for traditional lecture, and Group-B (Roll Number 76 to 150) were taken for SGD. Pre and post multiple choice assessment was performed. Perception of both Groups A and B about traditional Lecture and SGD was taken by pre-validated questionnaire based on Likert’s scale. Crossover of the groups was done with second topic. Student’s t-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test results and the p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean in post-test scores of Group-B i.e., in SGD was 55.8±4.51 (p-value=0.022). As per 55 (88.7%) students, small group teaching session was less stressful. A total of 59 (95.15%) students agreed that SGD was interactive and 58 (93.54%) said they had their active participation and 61 (98.38%) students developed interest. A total of 58 (93.54%) students agreed that, it helped in retaining knowledge. As per 62 (99.9%) students, SGD was useful for improvement of communication skill among students, were of the opinion that they had a good level of discussion in SGD session. Conclusion: SGD involves active participation with good communication skills and develops good retention of knowledge. It has been introduced in the new curriculum to increase the efficiency of students.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small Group Discussion versus Traditional Lecture in Anatomy Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"R. Jaiswal\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijars/2023/61027.2893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: All educational institutions follow different types of teaching and learning methods to deliver knowledge to the students. The conventional teaching methodology is commonly used in many educational institutions. Small group discussion (SGD) aids in improving the basic skills required for every task i.e., communication skills. Enthusiastic participation help in creating a dynamic and lively environment for the progress of participants. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Small group discussion (SGD) over traditional lectures and to assess the perception of students regarding SGD versus traditional lectures. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with MBBS Phase-I medical students from November 2019 to April 2020 in Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. About 150 MBBS Phase-I medical students were divided into 2 groups, A and B, 75 students per group. Group-A (Roll Number 1 to 75) was taken for traditional lecture, and Group-B (Roll Number 76 to 150) were taken for SGD. Pre and post multiple choice assessment was performed. Perception of both Groups A and B about traditional Lecture and SGD was taken by pre-validated questionnaire based on Likert’s scale. Crossover of the groups was done with second topic. Student’s t-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test results and the p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean in post-test scores of Group-B i.e., in SGD was 55.8±4.51 (p-value=0.022). As per 55 (88.7%) students, small group teaching session was less stressful. A total of 59 (95.15%) students agreed that SGD was interactive and 58 (93.54%) said they had their active participation and 61 (98.38%) students developed interest. A total of 58 (93.54%) students agreed that, it helped in retaining knowledge. As per 62 (99.9%) students, SGD was useful for improvement of communication skill among students, were of the opinion that they had a good level of discussion in SGD session. Conclusion: SGD involves active participation with good communication skills and develops good retention of knowledge. It has been introduced in the new curriculum to increase the efficiency of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/61027.2893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/61027.2893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有的教育机构都遵循不同类型的教学和学习方法来向学生传授知识。许多教育机构普遍采用传统的教学方法。小组讨论(SGD)有助于提高每个任务所需的基本技能,即沟通技巧。热情的参与有助于为参与者的进步创造一个充满活力和活力的环境。目的:评估小组讨论(SGD)优于传统讲座的有效性,并评估学生对SGD与传统讲座的看法。材料和方法:2019年11月至2020年4月,在中央邦博帕尔Chirayu医学院和医院的MBBS一期医科学生中进行了一项横断面研究。约150名MBBS一期医学生分为A、B两组,每组75人。a组(学号1 - 75)为传统讲座,b组(学号76 - 150)为SGD。进行选择题前后评估。A组和B组对传统讲座和SGD的感知采用李克特量表预验证问卷。两组的交叉是在第二个主题上进行的。采用学生t检验比较前测和后测结果,p<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:b组测试后评分即SGD的平均值为55.8±4.51 (p值=0.022)。55名(88.7%)学生认为小组教学压力较小。共有59名(95.15%)学生认为SGD是互动的,58名(93.54%)学生表示积极参与,61名(98.38%)学生表示感兴趣。共有58名(93.54%)学生认为这有助于记忆知识。62名(99.9%)学生认为SGD有助于提高学生之间的沟通技巧,他们认为在SGD会议上进行了很好的讨论。结论:SGD涉及积极参与,良好的沟通能力和良好的知识保留。为了提高学生的学习效率,在新课程中引入了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Small Group Discussion versus Traditional Lecture in Anatomy Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study
Introduction: All educational institutions follow different types of teaching and learning methods to deliver knowledge to the students. The conventional teaching methodology is commonly used in many educational institutions. Small group discussion (SGD) aids in improving the basic skills required for every task i.e., communication skills. Enthusiastic participation help in creating a dynamic and lively environment for the progress of participants. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of Small group discussion (SGD) over traditional lectures and to assess the perception of students regarding SGD versus traditional lectures. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with MBBS Phase-I medical students from November 2019 to April 2020 in Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. About 150 MBBS Phase-I medical students were divided into 2 groups, A and B, 75 students per group. Group-A (Roll Number 1 to 75) was taken for traditional lecture, and Group-B (Roll Number 76 to 150) were taken for SGD. Pre and post multiple choice assessment was performed. Perception of both Groups A and B about traditional Lecture and SGD was taken by pre-validated questionnaire based on Likert’s scale. Crossover of the groups was done with second topic. Student’s t-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test results and the p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean in post-test scores of Group-B i.e., in SGD was 55.8±4.51 (p-value=0.022). As per 55 (88.7%) students, small group teaching session was less stressful. A total of 59 (95.15%) students agreed that SGD was interactive and 58 (93.54%) said they had their active participation and 61 (98.38%) students developed interest. A total of 58 (93.54%) students agreed that, it helped in retaining knowledge. As per 62 (99.9%) students, SGD was useful for improvement of communication skill among students, were of the opinion that they had a good level of discussion in SGD session. Conclusion: SGD involves active participation with good communication skills and develops good retention of knowledge. It has been introduced in the new curriculum to increase the efficiency of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信