美国放射学会甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统与Bethesda评分系统在甲状腺结节评估中的相关性:一项前瞻性横断面研究

Rithi Melissa Dsilva, HB Suresh, C. Jayaprakash
{"title":"美国放射学会甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统与Bethesda评分系统在甲状腺结节评估中的相关性:一项前瞻性横断面研究","authors":"Rithi Melissa Dsilva, HB Suresh, C. Jayaprakash","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/55447.2853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In view of increased detection of incidental thyroid nodules on ultrasonography, there is a need for standardising the reporting system of thyroid nodules for better patient management. Aim: To assess concordance between two classification systems of thyroid nodules: American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) 2017 criteria on sonography and Bethesda categories on cytology. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional validation study was conducted in Department of Radiology in collaboration with the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, India, over a period of 12 months between October 2017 to September 2018. A total of 175 thyroid nodules detected on Ultrasonography (USG) were categorised based on ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria. Ultrasound guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) was performed on the nodules and were scored on the basis of Bethesda categories. Nodules were categorized into benign and malignant under TIRADS and Bethesda and their concordance was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were assessed. Pearsons Chi-square test statistical method and kappa values were used in analysis. Results: Solid composition, hypoechoic echotexture, taller than wide shape, irregular margin and microcalcification descriptors of ACR TIRADS 2017 system were features more in favour of a malignant nodule. With FNAC as gold standard, TIRADS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 91.7 %, 86.3%, 63.5%, 97.6% and 87.4% respectively (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The stratification of risk among thyroid nodules as benign or malignant using ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria yielded good result in our study. With careful examination of nodules, TIRADS can be used to select appropriate nodules for further evaluation with cytology.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Bethesda Scoring System in Assessment of Thyroid Nodule: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Rithi Melissa Dsilva, HB Suresh, C. Jayaprakash\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijars/2023/55447.2853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In view of increased detection of incidental thyroid nodules on ultrasonography, there is a need for standardising the reporting system of thyroid nodules for better patient management. Aim: To assess concordance between two classification systems of thyroid nodules: American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) 2017 criteria on sonography and Bethesda categories on cytology. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional validation study was conducted in Department of Radiology in collaboration with the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, India, over a period of 12 months between October 2017 to September 2018. A total of 175 thyroid nodules detected on Ultrasonography (USG) were categorised based on ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria. Ultrasound guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) was performed on the nodules and were scored on the basis of Bethesda categories. Nodules were categorized into benign and malignant under TIRADS and Bethesda and their concordance was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were assessed. Pearsons Chi-square test statistical method and kappa values were used in analysis. Results: Solid composition, hypoechoic echotexture, taller than wide shape, irregular margin and microcalcification descriptors of ACR TIRADS 2017 system were features more in favour of a malignant nodule. With FNAC as gold standard, TIRADS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 91.7 %, 86.3%, 63.5%, 97.6% and 87.4% respectively (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The stratification of risk among thyroid nodules as benign or malignant using ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria yielded good result in our study. With careful examination of nodules, TIRADS can be used to select appropriate nodules for further evaluation with cytology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/55447.2853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/55447.2853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:鉴于超声检查对偶发甲状腺结节的检出率越来越高,有必要规范甲状腺结节的报告制度,以更好地管理患者。目的:评估两种甲状腺结节分类系统之间的一致性:美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(TIRADS) 2017年超声检查标准和细胞学Bethesda分类。材料和方法:在2017年10月至2018年9月的12个月期间,在印度卡纳塔克邦Dakshina Kannada地区一家三级保健医院的放射科与病理学部合作进行了一项前瞻性横断面验证研究。根据ACR TIRADS 2017标准对超声检查(USG)检测到的175个甲状腺结节进行分类。对结节行超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),并根据Bethesda分类进行评分。在TIRADS和Bethesda下将结节分为良性和恶性,并评估其一致性。评估敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。分析采用皮尔逊卡方检验、统计学方法和kappa值。结果:ACR TIRADS 2017系统的实性组成、低回声、高过宽、边缘不规则、微钙化等特征更有利于恶性结节的诊断。以FNAC为金标准,TIRADS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为91.7%、86.3%、63.5%、97.6%和87.4% (p值<0.001)。结论:在我们的研究中,使用ACR TIRADS 2017标准对甲状腺结节进行良性或恶性风险分层获得了良好的结果。通过对结节的仔细检查,TIRADS可用于选择适当的结节进行进一步的细胞学评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Bethesda Scoring System in Assessment of Thyroid Nodule: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: In view of increased detection of incidental thyroid nodules on ultrasonography, there is a need for standardising the reporting system of thyroid nodules for better patient management. Aim: To assess concordance between two classification systems of thyroid nodules: American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) 2017 criteria on sonography and Bethesda categories on cytology. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional validation study was conducted in Department of Radiology in collaboration with the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care hospital in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, India, over a period of 12 months between October 2017 to September 2018. A total of 175 thyroid nodules detected on Ultrasonography (USG) were categorised based on ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria. Ultrasound guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) was performed on the nodules and were scored on the basis of Bethesda categories. Nodules were categorized into benign and malignant under TIRADS and Bethesda and their concordance was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were assessed. Pearsons Chi-square test statistical method and kappa values were used in analysis. Results: Solid composition, hypoechoic echotexture, taller than wide shape, irregular margin and microcalcification descriptors of ACR TIRADS 2017 system were features more in favour of a malignant nodule. With FNAC as gold standard, TIRADS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 91.7 %, 86.3%, 63.5%, 97.6% and 87.4% respectively (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: The stratification of risk among thyroid nodules as benign or malignant using ACR TIRADS 2017 criteria yielded good result in our study. With careful examination of nodules, TIRADS can be used to select appropriate nodules for further evaluation with cytology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信