锁骨下静脉插管及其常见的技术错误、失败率和并发症:一项横断面研究

Pravinkumar Govande, Ankush Aasole, Sunil Bomble, Ravikumar Phad, K. Gupta
{"title":"锁骨下静脉插管及其常见的技术错误、失败率和并发症:一项横断面研究","authors":"Pravinkumar Govande, Ankush Aasole, Sunil Bomble, Ravikumar Phad, K. Gupta","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2022/50466.2746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indicated when peripheral vein administration is not possible which can be inserted via different routes. CVC play a significant role in the therapeutic armamentarium of the surgeon and intensivist. The subclavian vein is the most frequently used access site but is associated with certain risks and failures. Aim: To study common technical errors, failure rate and complications associated with subclavian cannulation. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study carried out on 100 patients admitted from October 2017 to October 2020 for various surgical diseases in a Swami Ramanand Teerth Rural Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, India, requiring CVC placement. Subclavian vein cannulation (SVC) technique was done as standard method. Surgeon or anaesthetist who was performing the procedure noted the number of insertion attempts, failures and complications. Data was collected and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 and paired t-test. Level of significance was set at p-value <0.05. Results: Total of 100 patients included in the study, 57 (57%) were male with mean age of 61±14.2 years and 43 (43%) were female with mean age of 58±11.7 years. SVC was successfully done in all 100 cases but in 236 attempts. Thus, 136 attempts were failure and the overall failure rate was 57.62%. On an average there are 2.4 failed attempts per line. The most common technical error observed was improper site for needle insertion relative to the clavicle 27.94% followed by insertion of the needle through the clavicular periosteum 25.74%. The overall complication rate was 9% and most common complications was haematoma in 6%, catheter site infection 2% and pneumothorax in 1%. Conclusion: Subclavian vein catheterisation is an important invasive procedure often performed to administer drugs, haemodynamic monitoring and total parenteral nutrition. It is associated with high failure rate and complications due to technical errors of judgement leading to multiple attempts of needle insertion. They can be minimised with knowledge of anatomical landmarks, ultrasound guidance and Subclavian Vein Cannulation (SVC) personnel experience.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subclavian Vein Cannulation and its Common Technical Errors, Failure Rates and Complications: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Pravinkumar Govande, Ankush Aasole, Sunil Bomble, Ravikumar Phad, K. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/ijars/2022/50466.2746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indicated when peripheral vein administration is not possible which can be inserted via different routes. CVC play a significant role in the therapeutic armamentarium of the surgeon and intensivist. The subclavian vein is the most frequently used access site but is associated with certain risks and failures. Aim: To study common technical errors, failure rate and complications associated with subclavian cannulation. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study carried out on 100 patients admitted from October 2017 to October 2020 for various surgical diseases in a Swami Ramanand Teerth Rural Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, India, requiring CVC placement. Subclavian vein cannulation (SVC) technique was done as standard method. Surgeon or anaesthetist who was performing the procedure noted the number of insertion attempts, failures and complications. Data was collected and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 and paired t-test. Level of significance was set at p-value <0.05. Results: Total of 100 patients included in the study, 57 (57%) were male with mean age of 61±14.2 years and 43 (43%) were female with mean age of 58±11.7 years. SVC was successfully done in all 100 cases but in 236 attempts. Thus, 136 attempts were failure and the overall failure rate was 57.62%. On an average there are 2.4 failed attempts per line. The most common technical error observed was improper site for needle insertion relative to the clavicle 27.94% followed by insertion of the needle through the clavicular periosteum 25.74%. The overall complication rate was 9% and most common complications was haematoma in 6%, catheter site infection 2% and pneumothorax in 1%. Conclusion: Subclavian vein catheterisation is an important invasive procedure often performed to administer drugs, haemodynamic monitoring and total parenteral nutrition. It is associated with high failure rate and complications due to technical errors of judgement leading to multiple attempts of needle insertion. They can be minimised with knowledge of anatomical landmarks, ultrasound guidance and Subclavian Vein Cannulation (SVC) personnel experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2022/50466.2746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2022/50466.2746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中心静脉导管(CVC)是指外周静脉给药不可能时,可以通过不同的路径插入。CVC在外科医生和重症监护医生的治疗设备中起着重要的作用。锁骨下静脉是最常用的入路,但有一定的风险和失败。目的:探讨锁骨下插管术中常见的技术失误、失败率及并发症。材料和方法:本研究是一项横断面观察性研究,对2017年10月至2020年10月在印度马哈拉施特拉邦Ambajogai的Swami Ramanand Teerth农村政府医学院收治的100名患有各种外科疾病的患者进行研究,这些患者需要放置CVC。锁骨下静脉插管(SVC)技术作为标准方法。执行手术的外科医生或麻醉师记录了插入尝试、失败和并发症的次数。数据收集和分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本21.0和配对t检验。p <0.05为显著性水平。结果:共纳入100例患者,其中男性57例(57%),平均年龄61±14.2岁;女性43例(43%),平均年龄58±11.7岁。所有100例SVC均成功,但有236例尝试。136次尝试失败,总失败率为57.62%。平均每行有2.4次失败尝试。最常见的技术错误是相对于锁骨入针位置不当(27.94%),其次是穿过锁骨骨膜入针(25.74%)。总并发症发生率为9%,最常见的并发症是血肿(6%)、导管部位感染(2%)和气胸(1%)。结论:锁骨下静脉置管是一项重要的侵入性手术,常用于给药、血流动力学监测和全肠外营养。它与高失败率和由于技术判断错误导致多次尝试插入针的并发症有关。通过解剖标志知识、超声引导和锁骨下静脉插管(SVC)人员经验,可以将其最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subclavian Vein Cannulation and its Common Technical Errors, Failure Rates and Complications: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indicated when peripheral vein administration is not possible which can be inserted via different routes. CVC play a significant role in the therapeutic armamentarium of the surgeon and intensivist. The subclavian vein is the most frequently used access site but is associated with certain risks and failures. Aim: To study common technical errors, failure rate and complications associated with subclavian cannulation. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study carried out on 100 patients admitted from October 2017 to October 2020 for various surgical diseases in a Swami Ramanand Teerth Rural Government Medical College, Ambajogai, Maharashtra, India, requiring CVC placement. Subclavian vein cannulation (SVC) technique was done as standard method. Surgeon or anaesthetist who was performing the procedure noted the number of insertion attempts, failures and complications. Data was collected and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 and paired t-test. Level of significance was set at p-value <0.05. Results: Total of 100 patients included in the study, 57 (57%) were male with mean age of 61±14.2 years and 43 (43%) were female with mean age of 58±11.7 years. SVC was successfully done in all 100 cases but in 236 attempts. Thus, 136 attempts were failure and the overall failure rate was 57.62%. On an average there are 2.4 failed attempts per line. The most common technical error observed was improper site for needle insertion relative to the clavicle 27.94% followed by insertion of the needle through the clavicular periosteum 25.74%. The overall complication rate was 9% and most common complications was haematoma in 6%, catheter site infection 2% and pneumothorax in 1%. Conclusion: Subclavian vein catheterisation is an important invasive procedure often performed to administer drugs, haemodynamic monitoring and total parenteral nutrition. It is associated with high failure rate and complications due to technical errors of judgement leading to multiple attempts of needle insertion. They can be minimised with knowledge of anatomical landmarks, ultrasound guidance and Subclavian Vein Cannulation (SVC) personnel experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信