绿色企业,从根到枝:经济环境主义的形式与局限

IF 0.4 Q4 ETHICS
L. Newton
{"title":"绿色企业,从根到枝:经济环境主义的形式与局限","authors":"L. Newton","doi":"10.5840/BPEJ2005241/22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the paper is to examine the roots of our obligation to preserve the land and its resources, to address in some systematic way the \"So what?\" response to the massive documentation of environmental dete rioration and the accompanying environmentalist imperatives. We will begin with an exercise in deconstruction?the parsing of an event, just one event, to extract from its account some of the problems that environmental ism has got itself into, especially in dealing with the multiple faces of American business. From that point we will be in a position to address the central project of the paper, an elaboration of an ethic for the appreciation and protection of the natural environment, \"the land,\" for short, meaning the earth, all its life, all its resources. The event in question was the presentation of a paper at a meeting of environmental funding agencies, hardly the sort of thing that normally ruffles the feathers of angels dancing on the heads of pins. The program of the meeting featured reflections from a variety of sources on the status of the nation's environmental initiatives. To the enormous chagrin of the leaders of the environmental movement, two relative youngsters, Michael Shell enberger and Ted Nordhaus, upended what had been a relatively unified forum with an argument that environmentalism, as a movement, was dead,","PeriodicalId":53983,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","volume":"24 1","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greening Business, Root and Branch: The Forms and Limits of Economic Environmentalism\",\"authors\":\"L. Newton\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/BPEJ2005241/22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the paper is to examine the roots of our obligation to preserve the land and its resources, to address in some systematic way the \\\"So what?\\\" response to the massive documentation of environmental dete rioration and the accompanying environmentalist imperatives. We will begin with an exercise in deconstruction?the parsing of an event, just one event, to extract from its account some of the problems that environmental ism has got itself into, especially in dealing with the multiple faces of American business. From that point we will be in a position to address the central project of the paper, an elaboration of an ethic for the appreciation and protection of the natural environment, \\\"the land,\\\" for short, meaning the earth, all its life, all its resources. The event in question was the presentation of a paper at a meeting of environmental funding agencies, hardly the sort of thing that normally ruffles the feathers of angels dancing on the heads of pins. The program of the meeting featured reflections from a variety of sources on the status of the nation's environmental initiatives. To the enormous chagrin of the leaders of the environmental movement, two relative youngsters, Michael Shell enberger and Ted Nordhaus, upended what had been a relatively unified forum with an argument that environmentalism, as a movement, was dead,\",\"PeriodicalId\":53983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"9-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2005241/22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2005241/22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是研究我们保护土地及其资源的义务的根源,以某种系统的方式解决“那又怎样?”对大量环境恶化的文件和随之而来的环保主义者的要求的回应。我们将从一个解构的练习开始?分析一个事件,仅仅是一个事件,从它的描述中提取出环境主义已经陷入的一些问题,特别是在处理美国商业的多重面孔时。从这一点出发,我们将能够解决本文的中心项目,即阐述欣赏和保护自然环境的伦理,“土地”,简称,意味着地球,它的所有生命,它的所有资源。这个事件是在一个环境资助机构会议上发表的一篇论文,通常不会让在大头针上跳舞的天使们感到不安。会议的主要内容是来自各方对中国环境行动现状的反思。令环境运动领袖们非常懊恼的是,两个相对年轻的人,迈克尔·谢尔·恩伯格和泰德·诺德豪斯,颠覆了一个相对统一的论坛,他们认为环保主义作为一项运动已经死亡,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Greening Business, Root and Branch: The Forms and Limits of Economic Environmentalism
The purpose of the paper is to examine the roots of our obligation to preserve the land and its resources, to address in some systematic way the "So what?" response to the massive documentation of environmental dete rioration and the accompanying environmentalist imperatives. We will begin with an exercise in deconstruction?the parsing of an event, just one event, to extract from its account some of the problems that environmental ism has got itself into, especially in dealing with the multiple faces of American business. From that point we will be in a position to address the central project of the paper, an elaboration of an ethic for the appreciation and protection of the natural environment, "the land," for short, meaning the earth, all its life, all its resources. The event in question was the presentation of a paper at a meeting of environmental funding agencies, hardly the sort of thing that normally ruffles the feathers of angels dancing on the heads of pins. The program of the meeting featured reflections from a variety of sources on the status of the nation's environmental initiatives. To the enormous chagrin of the leaders of the environmental movement, two relative youngsters, Michael Shell enberger and Ted Nordhaus, upended what had been a relatively unified forum with an argument that environmentalism, as a movement, was dead,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信