巴西关于残疾的论述秩序:一些考虑

Rosimar Serena Siqueira Esquinsani, Jarbas Dametto
{"title":"巴西关于残疾的论述秩序:一些考虑","authors":"Rosimar Serena Siqueira Esquinsani, Jarbas Dametto","doi":"10.5902/1984686x37799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the analysis of texts dealing with disability dating from the twentieth century, the present article sought to recover four terminologies used in the discourse to name deficiencies: idiots, imbeciles, cretins and retarded people. Based on an analytical-reconstructive methodology, the research that originated the text, used documentary sources and thematic bibliographic revision to search for the etymological origin of the referred terms and the reasons for its application by Science. Otherwise, the text seeks to problematize the implications of such terminologies in the treatment and social insertion of the affected individuals, and for that, the contributions of Michel Foucault as a starting point for a critical analysis of the discourse on disability were used. Considering that the discussion of names and adjectives assumes a connotation that goes beyond mere semantic construction, the text concludes that the categories of abnormality used by science throughout the twentieth century, either by its discursive production trajectory or by its condition of materiality, warns of the need to think carefully about the actions and discourses that emerge in the encounter with the disabled subjects.","PeriodicalId":30343,"journal":{"name":"Revista Educacao Especial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O ordenamento discursivo sobre a deficiência no Brasil: algumas considerações\",\"authors\":\"Rosimar Serena Siqueira Esquinsani, Jarbas Dametto\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1984686x37799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through the analysis of texts dealing with disability dating from the twentieth century, the present article sought to recover four terminologies used in the discourse to name deficiencies: idiots, imbeciles, cretins and retarded people. Based on an analytical-reconstructive methodology, the research that originated the text, used documentary sources and thematic bibliographic revision to search for the etymological origin of the referred terms and the reasons for its application by Science. Otherwise, the text seeks to problematize the implications of such terminologies in the treatment and social insertion of the affected individuals, and for that, the contributions of Michel Foucault as a starting point for a critical analysis of the discourse on disability were used. Considering that the discussion of names and adjectives assumes a connotation that goes beyond mere semantic construction, the text concludes that the categories of abnormality used by science throughout the twentieth century, either by its discursive production trajectory or by its condition of materiality, warns of the need to think carefully about the actions and discourses that emerge in the encounter with the disabled subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Educacao Especial\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Educacao Especial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686x37799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Educacao Especial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686x37799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对20世纪以来有关残疾的文本的分析,本文试图恢复在话语中用来命名缺陷的四个术语:白痴,低能,白痴和智障人士。本研究以分析-重构的方法论为基础,运用文献资料和专题书目修订等方法,对《科学》杂志所引用术语的词源及其应用的原因进行了研究。否则,文本试图对这些术语在治疗和受影响个体的社会插入中的含义提出问题,为此,米歇尔·福柯的贡献作为对残疾话语的批判性分析的起点被使用。考虑到对名称和形容词的讨论假设了一种超越语义结构的内涵,本文得出结论,整个20世纪科学所使用的异常类别,无论是通过其话语生产轨迹还是通过其物质性条件,都警告我们需要仔细思考在与残疾主体相遇时出现的行为和话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O ordenamento discursivo sobre a deficiência no Brasil: algumas considerações
Through the analysis of texts dealing with disability dating from the twentieth century, the present article sought to recover four terminologies used in the discourse to name deficiencies: idiots, imbeciles, cretins and retarded people. Based on an analytical-reconstructive methodology, the research that originated the text, used documentary sources and thematic bibliographic revision to search for the etymological origin of the referred terms and the reasons for its application by Science. Otherwise, the text seeks to problematize the implications of such terminologies in the treatment and social insertion of the affected individuals, and for that, the contributions of Michel Foucault as a starting point for a critical analysis of the discourse on disability were used. Considering that the discussion of names and adjectives assumes a connotation that goes beyond mere semantic construction, the text concludes that the categories of abnormality used by science throughout the twentieth century, either by its discursive production trajectory or by its condition of materiality, warns of the need to think carefully about the actions and discourses that emerge in the encounter with the disabled subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信