肝胆胰手术后出血并发症的诊断和处理

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
A. Balakrishnan, S. Rinkoff, P. Goldsmith, S. Harper, N. Jamieson, E. Huguet, A. Jah, R. Praseedom
{"title":"肝胆胰手术后出血并发症的诊断和处理","authors":"A. Balakrishnan, S. Rinkoff, P. Goldsmith, S. Harper, N. Jamieson, E. Huguet, A. Jah, R. Praseedom","doi":"10.6092/1590-8577/2996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Post-operative haemorrhage is a known complication of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Prompt treatment minimizes mortality and morbidity; however, there is currently little uniformity in the management of this complication. Objective The total numbers of pancreatectomies or liver resections were identified using hospital episode statistic data. Methods Patients who experienced post-operative bleeding were identified with keyword searches of all discharge letters, imaging reports and the theatre-coding database for the period between January 2005 and December 2011. Treatment modalities for control of haemorrhage as well as morbidity, mortality, length of stay and survival were examined. Results Thirty-four of the 768 pancreatic and liver resections performed experienced post-operative haemorrhage. More patients bled following pancreatectomies (6.1%) compared to hepatectomies (2.5%). Bleeding was controlled using endoscopic, interventional radiological or surgical methods; re-laparotomy provided definitive management in the majority of patients. Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage was associated with significantly increased mortality (P=0.004). Length of stay was increased following haemorrhage post-pancreatectomy or hepatectomy (P<0.05). Conclusions Our study highlights the substantial increase in mortality and length of stay following post-pancreatectomy and post-hepatectomy haemorrhage. Re-laparotomy was frequently required for control of bleeding. Our proposed management algorithm based on the timing and site of bleeding may standardize treatment in this heterogeneous group. Image: Algorithm for the management of late post-resectional haemorrhage.","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"16 1","pages":"283-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis and Management of Haemorrhagic Complications Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery\",\"authors\":\"A. Balakrishnan, S. Rinkoff, P. Goldsmith, S. Harper, N. Jamieson, E. Huguet, A. Jah, R. Praseedom\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/1590-8577/2996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context Post-operative haemorrhage is a known complication of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Prompt treatment minimizes mortality and morbidity; however, there is currently little uniformity in the management of this complication. Objective The total numbers of pancreatectomies or liver resections were identified using hospital episode statistic data. Methods Patients who experienced post-operative bleeding were identified with keyword searches of all discharge letters, imaging reports and the theatre-coding database for the period between January 2005 and December 2011. Treatment modalities for control of haemorrhage as well as morbidity, mortality, length of stay and survival were examined. Results Thirty-four of the 768 pancreatic and liver resections performed experienced post-operative haemorrhage. More patients bled following pancreatectomies (6.1%) compared to hepatectomies (2.5%). Bleeding was controlled using endoscopic, interventional radiological or surgical methods; re-laparotomy provided definitive management in the majority of patients. Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage was associated with significantly increased mortality (P=0.004). Length of stay was increased following haemorrhage post-pancreatectomy or hepatectomy (P<0.05). Conclusions Our study highlights the substantial increase in mortality and length of stay following post-pancreatectomy and post-hepatectomy haemorrhage. Re-laparotomy was frequently required for control of bleeding. Our proposed management algorithm based on the timing and site of bleeding may standardize treatment in this heterogeneous group. Image: Algorithm for the management of late post-resectional haemorrhage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"283-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pancreas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:术后出血是肝胆胰手术的常见并发症。及时治疗可将死亡率和发病率降至最低;然而,目前对这一并发症的处理几乎没有一致性。目的利用医院事件统计资料,确定胰腺或肝脏切除术的总次数。方法对2005年1月至2011年12月所有出院病历、影像学报告及医院编码数据库进行关键词检索,对术后出血患者进行识别。检查了控制出血的治疗方式以及发病率、死亡率、住院时间和生存率。结果768例胰腺和肝脏切除术中34例出现术后出血。胰腺切除术后出血的患者(6.1%)多于肝切除术后出血的患者(2.5%)。采用内镜、介入放射或手术方法控制出血;再次剖腹手术对大多数患者提供了明确的治疗。胰腺切除术后出血与死亡率显著升高相关(P=0.004)。胰脏切除术和肝切除术后出血患者住院时间延长(P<0.05)。结论:我们的研究强调了胰脏切除术和肝切除术后出血的死亡率和住院时间的显著增加。经常需要再次剖腹手术来控制出血。我们提出的基于出血时间和部位的管理算法可以规范这一异质群体的治疗。图像:晚期切除术后出血的处理算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis and Management of Haemorrhagic Complications Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
Context Post-operative haemorrhage is a known complication of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Prompt treatment minimizes mortality and morbidity; however, there is currently little uniformity in the management of this complication. Objective The total numbers of pancreatectomies or liver resections were identified using hospital episode statistic data. Methods Patients who experienced post-operative bleeding were identified with keyword searches of all discharge letters, imaging reports and the theatre-coding database for the period between January 2005 and December 2011. Treatment modalities for control of haemorrhage as well as morbidity, mortality, length of stay and survival were examined. Results Thirty-four of the 768 pancreatic and liver resections performed experienced post-operative haemorrhage. More patients bled following pancreatectomies (6.1%) compared to hepatectomies (2.5%). Bleeding was controlled using endoscopic, interventional radiological or surgical methods; re-laparotomy provided definitive management in the majority of patients. Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage was associated with significantly increased mortality (P=0.004). Length of stay was increased following haemorrhage post-pancreatectomy or hepatectomy (P<0.05). Conclusions Our study highlights the substantial increase in mortality and length of stay following post-pancreatectomy and post-hepatectomy haemorrhage. Re-laparotomy was frequently required for control of bleeding. Our proposed management algorithm based on the timing and site of bleeding may standardize treatment in this heterogeneous group. Image: Algorithm for the management of late post-resectional haemorrhage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信