介绍了现代地震分析的不同阻尼方法

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
M. Ćosić, R. Folić, S. Brčić
{"title":"介绍了现代地震分析的不同阻尼方法","authors":"M. Ćosić, R. Folić, S. Brčić","doi":"10.5937/GRMK1701003C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the paper, on the basis of the analysis of a large number of scientific papers, presented their original systematization of seismic analyses of structures, where a large number of them were developed during the last twenty years. Seismic analyses are generally classified into two (four) groups: Linear Static Analyses (LSA) and Nonlinear Static Analyses (NSA), and Linear Dynamic Analyses (LDA) and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses (NDA). The analyses of nonlinear seismic structural response were classified separately from the Target Displacement Analyses (TDA) which defines the relationship of the seismic demand and seismic response. On the other hand, classification was also conducted depending on whether a nonlinear response of the system is obtained by the implementation of incremental-iterative procedures or by implementation of semi-iterative and/or semi-incremental procedures. NDA were classified according to the concept of mathematical formulation, i.e. whether they are based on only one dynamic analysis, several dynamic analyses or they are solved in combination with other methods. By implementing the conducted systematization of seismic analyses, one can efficiently consider which type of analysis is optimal for structural analysis and which type of analysis should be taken into account in the phase of preliminary and final analyses in the course of scientific research and professional projects. This paper also presents the aspects of damping modelling in structural analysis through the systematization of damping types and flowcharts, depending on the type of analysis applied: linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic. Damping has been systematized based on the way it was introduced into calculations, i.e. over material damping, link element damping and damping directly introduced into the analyses which are conducted in capacitive, time and frequency domains. In the process of creating numerical structural models, the type of damping and the way of its introduction into structural analysis can be very efficiently selected by applying the flow charts developed. By applying the developed flowcharts, alternative approaches to the introduction of damping into structural analysis can also be defined.","PeriodicalId":40707,"journal":{"name":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An overview of modern seismic analyses with different ways of damping introduction\",\"authors\":\"M. Ćosić, R. Folić, S. Brčić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/GRMK1701003C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors of the paper, on the basis of the analysis of a large number of scientific papers, presented their original systematization of seismic analyses of structures, where a large number of them were developed during the last twenty years. Seismic analyses are generally classified into two (four) groups: Linear Static Analyses (LSA) and Nonlinear Static Analyses (NSA), and Linear Dynamic Analyses (LDA) and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses (NDA). The analyses of nonlinear seismic structural response were classified separately from the Target Displacement Analyses (TDA) which defines the relationship of the seismic demand and seismic response. On the other hand, classification was also conducted depending on whether a nonlinear response of the system is obtained by the implementation of incremental-iterative procedures or by implementation of semi-iterative and/or semi-incremental procedures. NDA were classified according to the concept of mathematical formulation, i.e. whether they are based on only one dynamic analysis, several dynamic analyses or they are solved in combination with other methods. By implementing the conducted systematization of seismic analyses, one can efficiently consider which type of analysis is optimal for structural analysis and which type of analysis should be taken into account in the phase of preliminary and final analyses in the course of scientific research and professional projects. This paper also presents the aspects of damping modelling in structural analysis through the systematization of damping types and flowcharts, depending on the type of analysis applied: linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic. Damping has been systematized based on the way it was introduced into calculations, i.e. over material damping, link element damping and damping directly introduced into the analyses which are conducted in capacitive, time and frequency domains. In the process of creating numerical structural models, the type of damping and the way of its introduction into structural analysis can be very efficiently selected by applying the flow charts developed. By applying the developed flowcharts, alternative approaches to the introduction of damping into structural analysis can also be defined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/GRMK1701003C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/GRMK1701003C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文的作者在对大量科学论文进行分析的基础上,提出了他们最初的结构地震分析系统,其中许多是在过去二十年中发展起来的。地震分析一般分为两类:线性静态分析(LSA)和非线性静态分析(NSA),线性动态分析(LDA)和非线性动态分析(NDA)。非线性地震结构反应分析与目标位移分析(TDA)是分开的,后者定义了地震需求与地震反应的关系。另一方面,根据系统的非线性响应是采用增量迭代过程还是采用半迭代和/或半增量过程进行分类。NDA是根据数学公式的概念进行分类的,即NDA是仅基于一种动态分析,还是基于几种动态分析,还是结合其他方法进行求解。通过对地震分析进行系统化的实施,可以有效地考虑在科学研究和专业项目的过程中,哪种类型的分析对结构分析是最优的,哪种类型的分析应该在初步和最终分析阶段考虑。本文还通过阻尼类型和流程图的系统化,根据所应用的分析类型:线性和非线性,静态和动态,介绍了结构分析中阻尼建模的各个方面。阻尼根据其引入计算的方式进行了系统化,即超材料阻尼、连杆单元阻尼和直接引入电容域、时域和频域分析的阻尼。在建立数值结构模型的过程中,利用所开发的流程图可以非常有效地选择阻尼的类型及其引入结构分析的方式。通过应用开发的流程图,还可以定义将阻尼引入结构分析的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An overview of modern seismic analyses with different ways of damping introduction
The authors of the paper, on the basis of the analysis of a large number of scientific papers, presented their original systematization of seismic analyses of structures, where a large number of them were developed during the last twenty years. Seismic analyses are generally classified into two (four) groups: Linear Static Analyses (LSA) and Nonlinear Static Analyses (NSA), and Linear Dynamic Analyses (LDA) and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses (NDA). The analyses of nonlinear seismic structural response were classified separately from the Target Displacement Analyses (TDA) which defines the relationship of the seismic demand and seismic response. On the other hand, classification was also conducted depending on whether a nonlinear response of the system is obtained by the implementation of incremental-iterative procedures or by implementation of semi-iterative and/or semi-incremental procedures. NDA were classified according to the concept of mathematical formulation, i.e. whether they are based on only one dynamic analysis, several dynamic analyses or they are solved in combination with other methods. By implementing the conducted systematization of seismic analyses, one can efficiently consider which type of analysis is optimal for structural analysis and which type of analysis should be taken into account in the phase of preliminary and final analyses in the course of scientific research and professional projects. This paper also presents the aspects of damping modelling in structural analysis through the systematization of damping types and flowcharts, depending on the type of analysis applied: linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic. Damping has been systematized based on the way it was introduced into calculations, i.e. over material damping, link element damping and damping directly introduced into the analyses which are conducted in capacitive, time and frequency domains. In the process of creating numerical structural models, the type of damping and the way of its introduction into structural analysis can be very efficiently selected by applying the flow charts developed. By applying the developed flowcharts, alternative approaches to the introduction of damping into structural analysis can also be defined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信