预防性环境保护中的重大损害概念

N. Brkić
{"title":"预防性环境保护中的重大损害概念","authors":"N. Brkić","doi":"10.5937/gakv91-24731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant damage as a substantive condition of a claim for the removal of a source of danger was not subjected to assessment in court proceedings. Although a prerequisite, the courts did not assess whether there was a threat of substantial harm in the particular cases. Considering that the Law on Environmental Protection is the basic law in the field of environmental protection, as lex specialis, it should be applied when assessing whether a particular source of danger presents a risk from which significant damage could occur. If there is a threat of significant harm in accordance with biological parameters, economic cri-teria should not be relevant in deciding whether to approve the request to remove the source of the hazard. In addition to the aforementioned general criterion, the court should consider whether the rules governing neighborhood relations are relevant between the claimant and the respondent. It is also important which area the source of danger is in, as well as which objects are endangered. Any influence beyond what is permissible will be considered relevant or significant.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The concept of significant damage in preventive environmental protection\",\"authors\":\"N. Brkić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/gakv91-24731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significant damage as a substantive condition of a claim for the removal of a source of danger was not subjected to assessment in court proceedings. Although a prerequisite, the courts did not assess whether there was a threat of substantial harm in the particular cases. Considering that the Law on Environmental Protection is the basic law in the field of environmental protection, as lex specialis, it should be applied when assessing whether a particular source of danger presents a risk from which significant damage could occur. If there is a threat of significant harm in accordance with biological parameters, economic cri-teria should not be relevant in deciding whether to approve the request to remove the source of the hazard. In addition to the aforementioned general criterion, the court should consider whether the rules governing neighborhood relations are relevant between the claimant and the respondent. It is also important which area the source of danger is in, as well as which objects are endangered. Any influence beyond what is permissible will be considered relevant or significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-24731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-24731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重大损害作为消除危险源索赔的实质性条件在法庭诉讼中不受评估。虽然这是一个先决条件,但法院没有评估在具体案件中是否存在实质性损害的威胁。考虑到《环境保护法》是环境保护领域的基本法,作为特别法,在评估某一特定危险源是否构成可能造成重大损害的风险时,应适用《环境保护法》。如果根据生物学参数存在重大损害的威胁,在决定是否批准消除危险源的请求时,不应考虑经济标准。除了上述一般标准外,法院还应考虑管辖邻里关系的规则在申请人和被申请人之间是否相关。同样重要的是危险源所在的区域,以及哪些物体受到威胁。任何超出允许范围的影响将被视为相关或重大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The concept of significant damage in preventive environmental protection
Significant damage as a substantive condition of a claim for the removal of a source of danger was not subjected to assessment in court proceedings. Although a prerequisite, the courts did not assess whether there was a threat of substantial harm in the particular cases. Considering that the Law on Environmental Protection is the basic law in the field of environmental protection, as lex specialis, it should be applied when assessing whether a particular source of danger presents a risk from which significant damage could occur. If there is a threat of significant harm in accordance with biological parameters, economic cri-teria should not be relevant in deciding whether to approve the request to remove the source of the hazard. In addition to the aforementioned general criterion, the court should consider whether the rules governing neighborhood relations are relevant between the claimant and the respondent. It is also important which area the source of danger is in, as well as which objects are endangered. Any influence beyond what is permissible will be considered relevant or significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信