正常的最高法院

IF 0.7 4区社会学 Q2 LAW

Wisconsin Law Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.59015/wlr.bcht3349

E. Volokh

{"title":"正常的最高法院","authors":"E. Volokh","doi":"10.59015/wlr.bcht3349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is little new under the sun, especially when it comes to the Court and its critics. People have long argued that the Court is out of control; but in our sys-tem, rightly or wrongly, we have deliberately insulated the Court from certain kinds of control. As a result, the justices make decisions based on their own judgments, however controversial, about how to interpret the Constitution. This is just the normal operation of our Supreme Court, for better or worse. All that’s changing is which particular decisions are being made, and which partic-ular precedents are being reversed.","PeriodicalId":54350,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Normal Supreme Court\",\"authors\":\"E. Volokh\",\"doi\":\"10.59015/wlr.bcht3349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is little new under the sun, especially when it comes to the Court and its critics. People have long argued that the Court is out of control; but in our sys-tem, rightly or wrongly, we have deliberately insulated the Court from certain kinds of control. As a result, the justices make decisions based on their own judgments, however controversial, about how to interpret the Constitution. This is just the normal operation of our Supreme Court, for better or worse. All that’s changing is which particular decisions are being made, and which partic-ular precedents are being reversed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wisconsin Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wisconsin Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59015/wlr.bcht3349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59015/wlr.bcht3349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳底下没有什么新鲜事，尤其是涉及到最高法院及其批评者的时候。长期以来，人们一直认为最高法院已经失控;但在我们的制度中，无论对错，我们故意使法院免受某些形式的控制。因此，法官们根据自己的判断做出决定，无论如何有争议，关于如何解释宪法。无论好坏，这都是我们最高法院的正常运作。唯一改变的是做出了哪些特定的决定，哪些特定的先例被推翻了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Normal Supreme Court

There is little new under the sun, especially when it comes to the Court and its critics. People have long argued that the Court is out of control; but in our sys-tem, rightly or wrongly, we have deliberately insulated the Court from certain kinds of control. As a result, the justices make decisions based on their own judgments, however controversial, about how to interpret the Constitution. This is just the normal operation of our Supreme Court, for better or worse. All that’s changing is which particular decisions are being made, and which partic-ular precedents are being reversed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Wisconsin Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Wisconsin Law Review is a student-run journal of legal analysis and commentary that is used by professors, judges, practitioners, and others researching contemporary legal topics. The Wisconsin Law Review, which is published six times each year, includes professional and student articles, with content spanning local, state, national, and international topics. In addition to publishing the print journal, the Wisconsin Law Review publishes the Wisconsin Law Review Forward and sponsors an annual symposium at which leading scholars debate a significant issue in contemporary law.