C. Dulaney, W. Hall, J. Mikell, P. Mittal, R. Prabhu, D. Kooby, K. Hanley, J. Sarmiento, J. Landry
{"title":"诊断影像采集与手术时间间隔对胰腺腺癌病理肿瘤大小的影响:对局部治疗的意义","authors":"C. Dulaney, W. Hall, J. Mikell, P. Mittal, R. Prabhu, D. Kooby, K. Hanley, J. Sarmiento, J. Landry","doi":"10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may underestimate pancreatic tumor size, which has important implications for local therapy. Our aim was to determine if tumor growth during the interval between image acquisition and operative date impacted the observed size discrepancy. Methods: Tumor sizes measured on preoperative MRI were compared with gross pathological specimen measurements in 148 patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Differences in the measurements were correlated with the interval between date of pre-operative MRI acquisition and date of operation. Differences between tumor size on MRI and pathology reports were compared with respect to the intervening time interval. Results: A total of 148 patients had pre-operative MRI scans and were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 66 years (range: 29 years-86 years). A significant under estimation of 4.5 mm between tumor size measured on preoperative MRI and pathological examination ( p < .001) was demonstrated. There was no significant correlation between size discrepancy and time interval from the diagnostic imaging study and the surgical procedure (R 2 = 0.001, p = .72). Conclusions: Time interval between the acquired diagnostic imaging study and operative date appears to have no measureable influence on radiographic to pathologic size discrepancy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MRI was again shown to underestimate pancreatic cancer tumor size. Additional exploration into the role of MRI in delineating pancreatic tumor volume with a prospectively designed study is needed to validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":89580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","volume":"4 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of time interval between diagnostic image acquisition and operative date on pathologic tumor size in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for local therapy\",\"authors\":\"C. Dulaney, W. Hall, J. Mikell, P. Mittal, R. Prabhu, D. Kooby, K. Hanley, J. Sarmiento, J. Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may underestimate pancreatic tumor size, which has important implications for local therapy. Our aim was to determine if tumor growth during the interval between image acquisition and operative date impacted the observed size discrepancy. Methods: Tumor sizes measured on preoperative MRI were compared with gross pathological specimen measurements in 148 patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Differences in the measurements were correlated with the interval between date of pre-operative MRI acquisition and date of operation. Differences between tumor size on MRI and pathology reports were compared with respect to the intervening time interval. Results: A total of 148 patients had pre-operative MRI scans and were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 66 years (range: 29 years-86 years). A significant under estimation of 4.5 mm between tumor size measured on preoperative MRI and pathological examination ( p < .001) was demonstrated. There was no significant correlation between size discrepancy and time interval from the diagnostic imaging study and the surgical procedure (R 2 = 0.001, p = .72). Conclusions: Time interval between the acquired diagnostic imaging study and operative date appears to have no measureable influence on radiographic to pathologic size discrepancy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MRI was again shown to underestimate pancreatic cancer tumor size. Additional exploration into the role of MRI in delineating pancreatic tumor volume with a prospectively designed study is needed to validate these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V4N2P15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)可能低估胰腺肿瘤的大小,这对局部治疗具有重要意义。我们的目的是确定在图像采集和手术日期之间的肿瘤生长是否影响观察到的大小差异。方法:对148例手术切除的胰腺腺癌患者术前MRI测量的肿瘤大小与大体病理标本测量结果进行比较。测量结果的差异与术前MRI采集日期和手术日期之间的间隔有关。比较MRI显示的肿瘤大小与病理报告之间在间隔时间上的差异。结果:共有148例患者进行了术前MRI扫描并纳入分析。患者年龄中位数为66岁(范围:29 -86岁)。术前MRI测量的肿瘤大小与病理检查的肿瘤大小之间存在显著低于4.5 mm的估计(p < 0.001)。影像学检查与手术检查的大小差异和时间间隔无显著相关性(r2 = 0.001, p = 0.72)。结论:获得的诊断影像研究和手术日期之间的时间间隔似乎对胰腺腺癌的影像学和病理大小差异没有可测量的影响。MRI再次显示低估了胰腺癌肿瘤的大小。需要通过前瞻性设计的研究进一步探索MRI在描绘胰腺肿瘤体积中的作用,以验证这些发现。
The influence of time interval between diagnostic image acquisition and operative date on pathologic tumor size in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for local therapy
Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may underestimate pancreatic tumor size, which has important implications for local therapy. Our aim was to determine if tumor growth during the interval between image acquisition and operative date impacted the observed size discrepancy. Methods: Tumor sizes measured on preoperative MRI were compared with gross pathological specimen measurements in 148 patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Differences in the measurements were correlated with the interval between date of pre-operative MRI acquisition and date of operation. Differences between tumor size on MRI and pathology reports were compared with respect to the intervening time interval. Results: A total of 148 patients had pre-operative MRI scans and were included in the analysis. The median patient age was 66 years (range: 29 years-86 years). A significant under estimation of 4.5 mm between tumor size measured on preoperative MRI and pathological examination ( p < .001) was demonstrated. There was no significant correlation between size discrepancy and time interval from the diagnostic imaging study and the surgical procedure (R 2 = 0.001, p = .72). Conclusions: Time interval between the acquired diagnostic imaging study and operative date appears to have no measureable influence on radiographic to pathologic size discrepancy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MRI was again shown to underestimate pancreatic cancer tumor size. Additional exploration into the role of MRI in delineating pancreatic tumor volume with a prospectively designed study is needed to validate these findings.