使用MRI和骨关节炎主动队列对膝关节骨髓病变进行定量的全自动系统

P. Dodin, F. Abram, J. Pelletier, J. Martel-Pelletier
{"title":"使用MRI和骨关节炎主动队列对膝关节骨髓病变进行定量的全自动系统","authors":"P. Dodin, F. Abram, J. Pelletier, J. Martel-Pelletier","doi":"10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) have been associated with pain and cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis; their specific detection and quantification is therefore of primary importance. This study aimed at developing a fully automated quantitative BML assessment technology for human knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance images (MRI) and two sequences, a T1/T2*-weighted gradient echo (DESS) and a water-sensitive intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo (IW-TSE). Methods: The automated BML quantification first characterizes the bone and cartilage domains in the DESS sequence using our already published automated technology, then proceeds to the BML quantification which was developed as a four-stage process: selection of structured bright areas corresponding to BMLs, geometric filtering of unrelated structures, segmentation of the BML, and quantification of BML proportion within bone regions. For the IW-TSE sequence, the first step consists of the transfer of the bone and cartilage objects from the DESS to the IW-TSE images, followed by the BML detection and quantification as for the DESS. Validation was performed on 154 OA patients from a subset of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort (public data sets) in which BML manual segmentation intra- and inter-reader reliability was done for each sequence (DESS and IW-TSE) using the intraclass correlation (ICC). BML comparison between the newly developed automated method with a manual segmentation was performed with ICC for the proportion of BML and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for BML localization and geometric extent. Finally, comparisons between the DESS and the IW-TSE sequences were performed for BML incidence and proportion. Results: Excellent to very good correlations were obtained for both MRI sequences for intra- and inter-reader reliability of the manual BML segmentation. Comparison between the developed automated method and the manual BML segment- ation showed excellent to very good correlations in the global knee and regions (ICC=0.99 to 0.68 for DESS and 0.99 to 0.77 for IW-TSE sequences) as well as very good to good similarity for the BML geometrical agreement (DESS, 0.60 to 0.41; IW-TSE, 0.59 to 0.41). Data revealed greater BML incidence at the sites of high articular constraints: lateral femoropatellar and medial tibiofemoral articulation. Average BML proportion revealed a scaling factor of about 4.5-fold more for the IW-TSE compared to the DESS. Conclusions: The newly developed fully automated MRI based BML assessment technology not only detects the absence/ presence of these pathological signals in the osteoarthritic human knee, but also provides accurate quantitative assessment of BMLs in the global knee and knee regions. Such automated system will enable large scale studies to be conducted within shorter durations, as well as increase stability of the reading.","PeriodicalId":89580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","volume":"226 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fully automated system for quantification of knee bone marrow lesions using MRI and the osteoarthritis initiative cohort\",\"authors\":\"P. Dodin, F. Abram, J. Pelletier, J. Martel-Pelletier\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Objective: Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) have been associated with pain and cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis; their specific detection and quantification is therefore of primary importance. This study aimed at developing a fully automated quantitative BML assessment technology for human knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance images (MRI) and two sequences, a T1/T2*-weighted gradient echo (DESS) and a water-sensitive intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo (IW-TSE). Methods: The automated BML quantification first characterizes the bone and cartilage domains in the DESS sequence using our already published automated technology, then proceeds to the BML quantification which was developed as a four-stage process: selection of structured bright areas corresponding to BMLs, geometric filtering of unrelated structures, segmentation of the BML, and quantification of BML proportion within bone regions. For the IW-TSE sequence, the first step consists of the transfer of the bone and cartilage objects from the DESS to the IW-TSE images, followed by the BML detection and quantification as for the DESS. Validation was performed on 154 OA patients from a subset of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort (public data sets) in which BML manual segmentation intra- and inter-reader reliability was done for each sequence (DESS and IW-TSE) using the intraclass correlation (ICC). BML comparison between the newly developed automated method with a manual segmentation was performed with ICC for the proportion of BML and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for BML localization and geometric extent. Finally, comparisons between the DESS and the IW-TSE sequences were performed for BML incidence and proportion. Results: Excellent to very good correlations were obtained for both MRI sequences for intra- and inter-reader reliability of the manual BML segmentation. Comparison between the developed automated method and the manual BML segment- ation showed excellent to very good correlations in the global knee and regions (ICC=0.99 to 0.68 for DESS and 0.99 to 0.77 for IW-TSE sequences) as well as very good to good similarity for the BML geometrical agreement (DESS, 0.60 to 0.41; IW-TSE, 0.59 to 0.41). Data revealed greater BML incidence at the sites of high articular constraints: lateral femoropatellar and medial tibiofemoral articulation. Average BML proportion revealed a scaling factor of about 4.5-fold more for the IW-TSE compared to the DESS. Conclusions: The newly developed fully automated MRI based BML assessment technology not only detects the absence/ presence of these pathological signals in the osteoarthritic human knee, but also provides accurate quantitative assessment of BMLs in the global knee and knee regions. Such automated system will enable large scale studies to be conducted within shorter durations, as well as increase stability of the reading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing\",\"volume\":\"226 1\",\"pages\":\"51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical graphics and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JBGC.V3N1P51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

背景/目的:骨髓病变(BMLs)与膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛和软骨变性有关;因此,它们的具体检测和定量至关重要。本研究旨在利用磁共振图像(MRI)和两个序列,T1/T2*加权梯度回波(DESS)和水敏感中加权涡轮自旋回波(IW-TSE),开发一种全自动定量评估人类膝关节骨关节炎BML的技术。方法:自动化BML量化首先使用我们已经发表的自动化技术表征DESS序列中的骨和软骨域,然后进行BML量化,该量化分为四个阶段:选择与BML对应的结构化明亮区域,不相关结构的几何滤波,BML分割,以及骨区域内BML比例的量化。对于IW-TSE序列,第一步是将骨和软骨目标从DESS转移到IW-TSE图像上,然后对DESS进行BML检测和量化。对来自骨关节炎倡议(OAI)队列子集(公共数据集)的154例OA患者进行验证,其中使用类内相关性(ICC)对每个序列(DESS和IW-TSE)进行BML手动分割阅读器内和阅读器间可靠性。将新开发的自动分割方法与人工分割方法进行了BML比较,并使用ICC对BML比例进行了比较,使用Dice相似系数(DSC)对BML定位和几何程度进行了比较。最后,比较DESS和IW-TSE序列对BML发病率和比例的影响。结果:两种MRI序列在手动BML分割的读卡器内和读卡器间的可靠性上获得了极好的相关性。将所开发的自动化方法与人工BML分割方法进行比较,发现在膝关节整体和区域上具有极好的相关性(DESS的ICC值为0.99 ~ 0.68,IW-TSE序列的ICC值为0.99 ~ 0.77),BML几何一致性也具有极好的相似性(DESS值为0.60 ~ 0.41;IW-TSE, 0.59至0.41)。数据显示,高度关节受限部位的BML发病率更高:股髌外侧关节和胫股内侧关节。平均BML比例显示,与DESS相比,IW-TSE的比例因子约为4.5倍。结论:新开发的基于MRI的全自动BML评估技术不仅可以检测出骨关节炎患者膝关节中这些病理信号的缺失/存在,还可以对整个膝关节和膝关节区域的BML进行准确的定量评估。这种自动化系统将使大规模的研究能够在更短的时间内进行,并增加读数的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A fully automated system for quantification of knee bone marrow lesions using MRI and the osteoarthritis initiative cohort
Background/Objective: Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) have been associated with pain and cartilage degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis; their specific detection and quantification is therefore of primary importance. This study aimed at developing a fully automated quantitative BML assessment technology for human knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance images (MRI) and two sequences, a T1/T2*-weighted gradient echo (DESS) and a water-sensitive intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo (IW-TSE). Methods: The automated BML quantification first characterizes the bone and cartilage domains in the DESS sequence using our already published automated technology, then proceeds to the BML quantification which was developed as a four-stage process: selection of structured bright areas corresponding to BMLs, geometric filtering of unrelated structures, segmentation of the BML, and quantification of BML proportion within bone regions. For the IW-TSE sequence, the first step consists of the transfer of the bone and cartilage objects from the DESS to the IW-TSE images, followed by the BML detection and quantification as for the DESS. Validation was performed on 154 OA patients from a subset of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort (public data sets) in which BML manual segmentation intra- and inter-reader reliability was done for each sequence (DESS and IW-TSE) using the intraclass correlation (ICC). BML comparison between the newly developed automated method with a manual segmentation was performed with ICC for the proportion of BML and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for BML localization and geometric extent. Finally, comparisons between the DESS and the IW-TSE sequences were performed for BML incidence and proportion. Results: Excellent to very good correlations were obtained for both MRI sequences for intra- and inter-reader reliability of the manual BML segmentation. Comparison between the developed automated method and the manual BML segment- ation showed excellent to very good correlations in the global knee and regions (ICC=0.99 to 0.68 for DESS and 0.99 to 0.77 for IW-TSE sequences) as well as very good to good similarity for the BML geometrical agreement (DESS, 0.60 to 0.41; IW-TSE, 0.59 to 0.41). Data revealed greater BML incidence at the sites of high articular constraints: lateral femoropatellar and medial tibiofemoral articulation. Average BML proportion revealed a scaling factor of about 4.5-fold more for the IW-TSE compared to the DESS. Conclusions: The newly developed fully automated MRI based BML assessment technology not only detects the absence/ presence of these pathological signals in the osteoarthritic human knee, but also provides accurate quantitative assessment of BMLs in the global knee and knee regions. Such automated system will enable large scale studies to be conducted within shorter durations, as well as increase stability of the reading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信