痴呆患者日常生活活动中指导特异性与护理抵抗性的关系

J. Buchanan, Brittaleigh DeJager, Sandra Garcia, D. Houlihan, C. Sears, Kathleen M. Fairchild, Adam F Sattler
{"title":"痴呆患者日常生活活动中指导特异性与护理抵抗性的关系","authors":"J. Buchanan, Brittaleigh DeJager, Sandra Garcia, D. Houlihan, C. Sears, Kathleen M. Fairchild, Adam F Sattler","doi":"10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common for persons with dementia to display resistant behaviors during activities of daily living (ADLs) and caregiver communication skills can influence the likelihood of these behaviors. Previous research suggests that the type of instructions issued by caregivers is related to rates of compliance during ADLs in persons with dementia. It is unclear, however, if these instruction types affect the likelihood resistiveness to care (RTC) during ADLs. The purpose of the current study was to examine how the use of different types of instructions relate to instances of RTC during ADLs. Results indicated that vague and ambiguous instructions (i.e., beta instructions) were more likely to precede and follow physical aggression compared to instructions that were more specific, clear and feasible (i.e., alpha instructions). Results also indicated that alpha instructions were more likely to precede verbal agitation. These findings have implications for communication training programs for caregivers working with persons with dementia.","PeriodicalId":72616,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nursing studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between instruction specificity and resistiveness to care during activities of daily living in persons with dementia\",\"authors\":\"J. Buchanan, Brittaleigh DeJager, Sandra Garcia, D. Houlihan, C. Sears, Kathleen M. Fairchild, Adam F Sattler\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is common for persons with dementia to display resistant behaviors during activities of daily living (ADLs) and caregiver communication skills can influence the likelihood of these behaviors. Previous research suggests that the type of instructions issued by caregivers is related to rates of compliance during ADLs in persons with dementia. It is unclear, however, if these instruction types affect the likelihood resistiveness to care (RTC) during ADLs. The purpose of the current study was to examine how the use of different types of instructions relate to instances of RTC during ADLs. Results indicated that vague and ambiguous instructions (i.e., beta instructions) were more likely to precede and follow physical aggression compared to instructions that were more specific, clear and feasible (i.e., alpha instructions). Results also indicated that alpha instructions were more likely to precede verbal agitation. These findings have implications for communication training programs for caregivers working with persons with dementia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nursing studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"45-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nursing studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nursing studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/CNS.V6N4P45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痴呆症患者在日常生活活动(adl)中表现出抗拒行为是很常见的,护理人员的沟通技巧会影响这些行为的可能性。先前的研究表明,护理人员发出的指示类型与痴呆症患者在ADLs期间的依从率有关。然而,目前尚不清楚这些指令类型是否会影响ADLs期间的护理抵抗可能性(RTC)。本研究的目的是研究不同类型的指令的使用与ADLs期间RTC的实例之间的关系。结果表明,相对于更为具体、清晰和可行的指令(alpha指令),模糊和模棱两可的指令(即beta指令)更有可能发生在身体攻击之前和之后。结果还表明,阿尔法指令更有可能先于言语激动。这些发现对与痴呆症患者一起工作的护理人员的沟通培训项目具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between instruction specificity and resistiveness to care during activities of daily living in persons with dementia
It is common for persons with dementia to display resistant behaviors during activities of daily living (ADLs) and caregiver communication skills can influence the likelihood of these behaviors. Previous research suggests that the type of instructions issued by caregivers is related to rates of compliance during ADLs in persons with dementia. It is unclear, however, if these instruction types affect the likelihood resistiveness to care (RTC) during ADLs. The purpose of the current study was to examine how the use of different types of instructions relate to instances of RTC during ADLs. Results indicated that vague and ambiguous instructions (i.e., beta instructions) were more likely to precede and follow physical aggression compared to instructions that were more specific, clear and feasible (i.e., alpha instructions). Results also indicated that alpha instructions were more likely to precede verbal agitation. These findings have implications for communication training programs for caregivers working with persons with dementia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信