孟鲁司特咀嚼片与膜包衣片中元素杂质的比较风险评价研究

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Stefan Angelevski, Irena Slaveska-Spirevska, Elena Lazarevska-Todevska, Tanja Bakovska-Stoimenova, M. Glavaš-Dodov, Maja Simonoska-Crcarevska, R. Slaveska-Raički
{"title":"孟鲁司特咀嚼片与膜包衣片中元素杂质的比较风险评价研究","authors":"Stefan Angelevski, Irena Slaveska-Spirevska, Elena Lazarevska-Todevska, Tanja Bakovska-Stoimenova, M. Glavaš-Dodov, Maja Simonoska-Crcarevska, R. Slaveska-Raički","doi":"10.5937/arhfarm73-41263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well documented that elemental impurities (EIs) are critical in the field of pharmaceutical development since they could affect the quality, efficacy and safety of the finished dosage form (FDF). The responsibility of pharmaceutical manufacturers is to demonstrate via assessment approach, risk-based control strategy and/or required data analysis that the FDFs are compliant with ICH Q3D (R2). The aim of this research is to conduct a comprehensive comparative EIs risk assessment study of three different Montelukast dosage forms produced as chewable tablets (4 mg and 5 mg) and film-coated tablets 10 mg. The inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) system was used for the determination of EIs in samples of Montelukast sodium as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), placebos for all FDFs, and FDFs. Moreover, the analyses were also conducted on three batches from all three studied FDFs. Based on ICH Q3D (R2) guidelines, the tested products for EIs Class 1 and Class 2A showed that EIs levels in the API and placebos are well below the ICH Option 1 oral and parenteral limits. For the examined batches of each FDF strength (total of 9), none of the EI exceeds their concentration limits.","PeriodicalId":39173,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative risk assessment study of elemental impurities in Montelukast chewable tablets and film-coated tablets\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Angelevski, Irena Slaveska-Spirevska, Elena Lazarevska-Todevska, Tanja Bakovska-Stoimenova, M. Glavaš-Dodov, Maja Simonoska-Crcarevska, R. Slaveska-Raički\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/arhfarm73-41263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well documented that elemental impurities (EIs) are critical in the field of pharmaceutical development since they could affect the quality, efficacy and safety of the finished dosage form (FDF). The responsibility of pharmaceutical manufacturers is to demonstrate via assessment approach, risk-based control strategy and/or required data analysis that the FDFs are compliant with ICH Q3D (R2). The aim of this research is to conduct a comprehensive comparative EIs risk assessment study of three different Montelukast dosage forms produced as chewable tablets (4 mg and 5 mg) and film-coated tablets 10 mg. The inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) system was used for the determination of EIs in samples of Montelukast sodium as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), placebos for all FDFs, and FDFs. Moreover, the analyses were also conducted on three batches from all three studied FDFs. Based on ICH Q3D (R2) guidelines, the tested products for EIs Class 1 and Class 2A showed that EIs levels in the API and placebos are well below the ICH Option 1 oral and parenteral limits. For the examined batches of each FDF strength (total of 9), none of the EI exceeds their concentration limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arhiv za Farmaciju\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arhiv za Farmaciju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm73-41263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm73-41263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元素杂质(ei)在药物开发领域至关重要,因为它们会影响成品剂型(FDF)的质量、疗效和安全性。药品制造商的责任是通过评估方法、基于风险的控制策略和/或所需的数据分析来证明fdf符合ICH Q3D (R2)。本研究的目的是对三种不同的孟鲁司特咀嚼片剂(4mg和5mg)和薄膜包膜片剂(10mg)进行全面的比较ei风险评估研究。采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)测定孟鲁司特钠作为活性药物成分(API)、所有fdf安慰剂和fdf样品中的ei。此外,还对所有三个研究的fdf中的三个批次进行了分析。根据ICH Q3D (R2)指南,1类和2A类ei的测试产品显示,原料药和安慰剂中的ei水平远低于ICH选项1口服和肠外限制。对于每个FDF强度的检查批次(共9个),EI均未超过其浓度限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative risk assessment study of elemental impurities in Montelukast chewable tablets and film-coated tablets
It is well documented that elemental impurities (EIs) are critical in the field of pharmaceutical development since they could affect the quality, efficacy and safety of the finished dosage form (FDF). The responsibility of pharmaceutical manufacturers is to demonstrate via assessment approach, risk-based control strategy and/or required data analysis that the FDFs are compliant with ICH Q3D (R2). The aim of this research is to conduct a comprehensive comparative EIs risk assessment study of three different Montelukast dosage forms produced as chewable tablets (4 mg and 5 mg) and film-coated tablets 10 mg. The inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) system was used for the determination of EIs in samples of Montelukast sodium as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), placebos for all FDFs, and FDFs. Moreover, the analyses were also conducted on three batches from all three studied FDFs. Based on ICH Q3D (R2) guidelines, the tested products for EIs Class 1 and Class 2A showed that EIs levels in the API and placebos are well below the ICH Option 1 oral and parenteral limits. For the examined batches of each FDF strength (total of 9), none of the EI exceeds their concentration limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arhiv za Farmaciju
Arhiv za Farmaciju Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信