Elena Ivanovska, Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska, Jelena Lazova, Nada Popstefanova, Marija Davcheva-Jovanoska, S. Trajković-Jolevska
{"title":"根据MDR 2017/745提供临床证据:医疗器械行业制造商面临的新挑战","authors":"Elena Ivanovska, Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska, Jelena Lazova, Nada Popstefanova, Marija Davcheva-Jovanoska, S. Trajković-Jolevska","doi":"10.5937/arhfarm1901039i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Providing necessary clinical evidence throughout the systems for Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Surveillance in accordance with new MDR 2017/745 requirements imposes new challenges for manufacturers in medical device industry. Manufacturers should make clinical evaluation a continuous process that summarizes findings and results from several mutually connected processes: PMS, vigilance, CIs. Gathered clinical evidence should also be used as input for SSCP, PSUR, CEAR. CIs should be designed, authorised, conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with provisions of Articles 62-81 and Annex XV. PMS and PMCF activities should provide appropriate evidence of planning, implementation of protocol and reporting; target residual risks and confirm safety and performance over device’s lifetime; include activities that address specific questions/residual risks. All activities are aimed towards several goals: improving quality, safety and reliability of devices and strengthening transparency of information for consumers.","PeriodicalId":39173,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing clinical evidence under the MDR 2017/745: New challenges for manufacturers in medical device industry\",\"authors\":\"Elena Ivanovska, Jasmina Tonic-Ribarska, Jelena Lazova, Nada Popstefanova, Marija Davcheva-Jovanoska, S. Trajković-Jolevska\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/arhfarm1901039i\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Providing necessary clinical evidence throughout the systems for Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Surveillance in accordance with new MDR 2017/745 requirements imposes new challenges for manufacturers in medical device industry. Manufacturers should make clinical evaluation a continuous process that summarizes findings and results from several mutually connected processes: PMS, vigilance, CIs. Gathered clinical evidence should also be used as input for SSCP, PSUR, CEAR. CIs should be designed, authorised, conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with provisions of Articles 62-81 and Annex XV. PMS and PMCF activities should provide appropriate evidence of planning, implementation of protocol and reporting; target residual risks and confirm safety and performance over device’s lifetime; include activities that address specific questions/residual risks. All activities are aimed towards several goals: improving quality, safety and reliability of devices and strengthening transparency of information for consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arhiv za Farmaciju\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arhiv za Farmaciju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm1901039i\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv za Farmaciju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm1901039i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Providing clinical evidence under the MDR 2017/745: New challenges for manufacturers in medical device industry
Summary Providing necessary clinical evidence throughout the systems for Clinical Evaluation and Post-Market Surveillance in accordance with new MDR 2017/745 requirements imposes new challenges for manufacturers in medical device industry. Manufacturers should make clinical evaluation a continuous process that summarizes findings and results from several mutually connected processes: PMS, vigilance, CIs. Gathered clinical evidence should also be used as input for SSCP, PSUR, CEAR. CIs should be designed, authorised, conducted, recorded and reported in accordance with provisions of Articles 62-81 and Annex XV. PMS and PMCF activities should provide appropriate evidence of planning, implementation of protocol and reporting; target residual risks and confirm safety and performance over device’s lifetime; include activities that address specific questions/residual risks. All activities are aimed towards several goals: improving quality, safety and reliability of devices and strengthening transparency of information for consumers.