苏格拉底探究在《忏悔录》中的价值

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Ancient Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/ancientphil202343220

Matthew Matherne

{"title":"苏格拉底探究在《忏悔录》中的价值","authors":"Matthew Matherne","doi":"10.5840/ancientphil202343220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes Socratic inquiry valuable? A standard response is what I term instrumentalism: Socratic inquiry is merely instrumentally valuable; it is valuable only because it produces valuable results. This paper challenges instrumentalism. First, I present two value puzzles for instrumentalists and argue that these puzzles are best solved by denying instrumentalism. Then, I survey passages in the Apology that point to the source of Socratic inquiry’s non-instrumental value.","PeriodicalId":38413,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Socratic Inquiry in the Apology\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Matherne\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/ancientphil202343220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What makes Socratic inquiry valuable? A standard response is what I term instrumentalism: Socratic inquiry is merely instrumentally valuable; it is valuable only because it produces valuable results. This paper challenges instrumentalism. First, I present two value puzzles for instrumentalists and argue that these puzzles are best solved by denying instrumentalism. Then, I survey passages in the Apology that point to the source of Socratic inquiry’s non-instrumental value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ancient Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ancient Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202343220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202343220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

苏格拉底式探究的价值何在?一种标准的回应是我所说的工具主义:苏格拉底式的探究仅仅具有工具价值;它之所以有价值，只是因为它产生了有价值的结果。本文对工具主义提出了挑战。首先，我为工具主义者提出了两个价值难题，并认为这些难题最好通过否认工具主义来解决。然后，我考察了《忏忏者》中指出苏格拉底探究的非工具价值来源的段落。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Value of Socratic Inquiry in the Apology

What makes Socratic inquiry valuable? A standard response is what I term instrumentalism: Socratic inquiry is merely instrumentally valuable; it is valuable only because it produces valuable results. This paper challenges instrumentalism. First, I present two value puzzles for instrumentalists and argue that these puzzles are best solved by denying instrumentalism. Then, I survey passages in the Apology that point to the source of Socratic inquiry’s non-instrumental value.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ancient Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Classics

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量