Dallal模型下回复率相等性检验的进一步研究

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4310/21-SII683
Yafei Chen, Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma
{"title":"Dallal模型下回复率相等性检验的进一步研究","authors":"Yafei Chen, Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma","doi":"10.4310/21-SII683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paired binary data naturally arises when paired body parts are investigated in clinical trials. In this paper, we will further study whether the response rates of g ( g ≥ 2) groups are equal under Dallal’s model and propose eight test statistics ( T aL , T aW , T aSC , T aR , T bL , T bW , T bSC and T bR ). Some expressions of these tests are derived. The simulation results show that likelihood ratio and Wald-type tests are not robust with respect to empirical type I error rates (TIEs). The score and Ronser-type tests can produce satisfactory TIEs and power, and therefore are recommended. A real example is given to illustrate the proposed methods.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further study on testing the equality of response rates under Dallal’s model\",\"authors\":\"Yafei Chen, Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.4310/21-SII683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paired binary data naturally arises when paired body parts are investigated in clinical trials. In this paper, we will further study whether the response rates of g ( g ≥ 2) groups are equal under Dallal’s model and propose eight test statistics ( T aL , T aW , T aSC , T aR , T bL , T bW , T bSC and T bR ). Some expressions of these tests are derived. The simulation results show that likelihood ratio and Wald-type tests are not robust with respect to empirical type I error rates (TIEs). The score and Ronser-type tests can produce satisfactory TIEs and power, and therefore are recommended. A real example is given to illustrate the proposed methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4310/21-SII683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4310/21-SII683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

配对二值数据是在临床试验中研究成对身体部位时自然产生的。本文将进一步研究g (g≥2)组在Dallal模型下的反应率是否相等,并提出8个检验统计量(T aL、T aW、T aSC、T aR、T bL、T bW、T bSC和T bR)。推导了这些试验的一些表达式。仿真结果表明,似然比和wald型检验对于经验I型错误率(TIEs)不具有鲁棒性。score和ronser型测试可以产生令人满意的TIEs和power,因此推荐使用。最后给出了一个实例来说明所提出的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Further study on testing the equality of response rates under Dallal’s model
Paired binary data naturally arises when paired body parts are investigated in clinical trials. In this paper, we will further study whether the response rates of g ( g ≥ 2) groups are equal under Dallal’s model and propose eight test statistics ( T aL , T aW , T aSC , T aR , T bL , T bW , T bSC and T bR ). Some expressions of these tests are derived. The simulation results show that likelihood ratio and Wald-type tests are not robust with respect to empirical type I error rates (TIEs). The score and Ronser-type tests can produce satisfactory TIEs and power, and therefore are recommended. A real example is given to illustrate the proposed methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信