信徒的平等:新教传教士与南非的种族政治

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Fiona Vernal
{"title":"信徒的平等:新教传教士与南非的种族政治","authors":"Fiona Vernal","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-6331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Equality of Believers: Protestant Missionaries and the Racial Politics of South Africa. By Richard Elphick. Reconsiderations in Southern African History. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012. Pp. vii, 437; map, tables, bibliography, index. $40.00 cloth, $40.00 E-book.What would happen if you took the theme of religion and probed its impact on the history of racial discourse, racism, and race relations in South Africa? The result would be Richard Elphick's long-awaited and magisterial, The Equality of Believers. From the role of liberalism, nationalism, Christian universalism and humanism, and the emergence of independent African churches to the contours of segregation, industrialization, and apartheid, Elphick uses the theme of religion to revisit some of the major questions that have preoccupied historians of nineteenth- and twentieth-century South Africa. The book is divided into three parts, spanning eighteen chapters. The early chapters sketch broadly the protagonists and antagonists of pioneer evangelism, the cultural chauvinism of European missionaries, and the pressures of indigenization. Black and white interlocutors queried whether spiritual and social equality were indeed axiomatic. Afrikaners voted with their feet and issued deafening refutations of gelykstelling (equalization of races), yet even among those missionaries who answered a resounding \"yes,\" few were ready to relinquish their paternalistic roles. Part two investigates the fusing of the lexicon of gelykstelling with the \"Social Gospel,\" the \"Native Question\" and segregation, developments that signaled how secularization would come to influence racial and evangelical discourses. The tum-of-the-century and interwar periods witnessed new alliances between secular and missionary organizations and reinforced missionary roles in shaping the discourse on settler colonialism, empire, and missions.The final section shows how a sometimes vague, but malleable notion of segregation gave way to assaults on the Cape franchise and on African education inter alia, and led to a more clearly delineated and concrete plan to implement apartheid It cannot be overstated that the history of race relations in South Africa is neither synonymous with nor a prelude to the inexorable march to apartheid after 1948. The Equality of Believers thus provides a welcome reconsideration of the relationship between Afrikaner nationalism, Calvinism, neo-Calvinism, the missiology of the Dutch Reformed Church, and apartheid ideology. Elphick engages in a nuanced analysis of the divergent views that hounded liberal interpretations out of the DRC establishment as it evolved into a volkskerk, underwent the paroxysms of Afrikaner nationalism, and retooled segregation ideology (pp. 3, 50). The verdict is a stinging indictment of liberals who failed to come up with a robust vision for multiracial South Africa, or at least one that could counter the \"strenuous\" intellectual work of apartheid ideologues who blended history, neo-Calvinism, biblical exegesis, and fear to win over their supporters (pp. 256, 264, 272).Blending English, Afrikaans, (and German) sources and historiographies, Elphick thus makes a persuasive case for using religion as an analytical framework to elucidate larger questions about the relationship between missions and empire, and religion and apartheid; especially in relation to the more materialist concerns of recent historians. He shows that in South Africa's long colonial past, in its systemic history of socioeconomic discrimination, and in the rise of African and Afrikaner nationalism, religion, whether framed as exclusive covenant theology, as missions, or as the Social Gospel, had important discursive and material contributions to make. Take for example these three key debates: the first about \"native\" agency/ \"native churches and white paternalism; the second, a row about whether a classical versus industrial education was more suitable for Africans; and third, the deliberations about whether and how Christianity should address societal ills. …","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"46 1","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Equality of Believers: Protestant Missionaries and the Racial Politics of South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Vernal\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-6331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Equality of Believers: Protestant Missionaries and the Racial Politics of South Africa. By Richard Elphick. Reconsiderations in Southern African History. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012. Pp. vii, 437; map, tables, bibliography, index. $40.00 cloth, $40.00 E-book.What would happen if you took the theme of religion and probed its impact on the history of racial discourse, racism, and race relations in South Africa? The result would be Richard Elphick's long-awaited and magisterial, The Equality of Believers. From the role of liberalism, nationalism, Christian universalism and humanism, and the emergence of independent African churches to the contours of segregation, industrialization, and apartheid, Elphick uses the theme of religion to revisit some of the major questions that have preoccupied historians of nineteenth- and twentieth-century South Africa. The book is divided into three parts, spanning eighteen chapters. The early chapters sketch broadly the protagonists and antagonists of pioneer evangelism, the cultural chauvinism of European missionaries, and the pressures of indigenization. Black and white interlocutors queried whether spiritual and social equality were indeed axiomatic. Afrikaners voted with their feet and issued deafening refutations of gelykstelling (equalization of races), yet even among those missionaries who answered a resounding \\\"yes,\\\" few were ready to relinquish their paternalistic roles. Part two investigates the fusing of the lexicon of gelykstelling with the \\\"Social Gospel,\\\" the \\\"Native Question\\\" and segregation, developments that signaled how secularization would come to influence racial and evangelical discourses. The tum-of-the-century and interwar periods witnessed new alliances between secular and missionary organizations and reinforced missionary roles in shaping the discourse on settler colonialism, empire, and missions.The final section shows how a sometimes vague, but malleable notion of segregation gave way to assaults on the Cape franchise and on African education inter alia, and led to a more clearly delineated and concrete plan to implement apartheid It cannot be overstated that the history of race relations in South Africa is neither synonymous with nor a prelude to the inexorable march to apartheid after 1948. The Equality of Believers thus provides a welcome reconsideration of the relationship between Afrikaner nationalism, Calvinism, neo-Calvinism, the missiology of the Dutch Reformed Church, and apartheid ideology. Elphick engages in a nuanced analysis of the divergent views that hounded liberal interpretations out of the DRC establishment as it evolved into a volkskerk, underwent the paroxysms of Afrikaner nationalism, and retooled segregation ideology (pp. 3, 50). The verdict is a stinging indictment of liberals who failed to come up with a robust vision for multiracial South Africa, or at least one that could counter the \\\"strenuous\\\" intellectual work of apartheid ideologues who blended history, neo-Calvinism, biblical exegesis, and fear to win over their supporters (pp. 256, 264, 272).Blending English, Afrikaans, (and German) sources and historiographies, Elphick thus makes a persuasive case for using religion as an analytical framework to elucidate larger questions about the relationship between missions and empire, and religion and apartheid; especially in relation to the more materialist concerns of recent historians. He shows that in South Africa's long colonial past, in its systemic history of socioeconomic discrimination, and in the rise of African and Afrikaner nationalism, religion, whether framed as exclusive covenant theology, as missions, or as the Social Gospel, had important discursive and material contributions to make. Take for example these three key debates: the first about \\\"native\\\" agency/ \\\"native churches and white paternalism; the second, a row about whether a classical versus industrial education was more suitable for Africans; and third, the deliberations about whether and how Christianity should address societal ills. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":45676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-6331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-6331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

信徒的平等:新教传教士与南非的种族政治。理查德·埃尔菲克著。南部非洲历史的反思。夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,2012。第七页,第437页;地图、表格、参考书目、索引。40美元的布料,40美元的电子书。如果你以宗教为主题,探讨它对南非种族话语、种族主义和种族关系的历史影响,会发生什么?结果就是理查德·埃尔菲克期待已久的权威之作《信徒的平等》。从自由主义、民族主义、基督教普世主义和人文主义的作用,到独立的非洲教会的出现,再到种族隔离、工业化和种族隔离的概况,埃尔菲克用宗教的主题重新审视了19世纪和20世纪南非历史学家所关注的一些主要问题。全书分为三部分,共十八章。前几章大致概述了先锋福音主义的主角和反对者,欧洲传教士的文化沙文主义,以及本土化的压力。黑人和白人的对话者质疑精神和社会平等是否真的是不言自明的。阿非利卡人用脚投票,发出震耳欲聋的声音,反驳种族平等,然而,即使在那些响亮地回答“是”的传教士中,也很少有人准备放弃他们家长式的角色。第二部分调查了gelykstelling词汇与“社会福音”、“本土问题”和种族隔离的融合,这些发展表明世俗化将如何影响种族和福音主义话语。世纪之交和两次世界大战之间的时期见证了世俗和传教组织之间的新联盟,并加强了传教士在塑造定居者殖民主义、帝国和传教话语中的作用。最后一节展示了一个有时模糊但可延展的种族隔离概念是如何让位于对开普选举权和非洲教育等的攻击,并导致了一个更清晰、更具体的实施种族隔离的计划。南非种族关系的历史既不是1948年后不可阻挡的种族隔离的同义词,也不是其前奏,这一点怎么强调都不过分。因此,《信徒的平等》提供了对阿非利卡民族主义、加尔文主义、新加尔文主义、荷兰归正教会宣教和种族隔离意识形态之间关系的重新思考。埃尔菲克细致入微地分析了各种不同的观点,这些观点在刚果民主共和国体制演变为人民运动、经历了阿非利卡民族主义的爆发和种族隔离意识形态的重组过程中,将自由主义的解释从民主体制中驱逐出来。这一判决是对自由主义者的一种尖锐的控诉,他们未能为多元种族的南非提出一个强有力的愿景,或者至少可以对抗种族隔离理论家“艰苦的”智力工作,他们将历史、新加尔文主义、圣经注释和恐惧混合在一起,以赢得支持者(第256,264,272页)。因此,埃尔菲克将英语、南非荷兰语(和德语)的资料和历史文献结合在一起,提出了一个有说服力的案例,将宗教作为一个分析框架,来阐明有关传教与帝国、宗教与种族隔离之间关系的更大问题;尤其是与近代历史学家更为唯物主义的关注有关。他表明,在南非漫长的殖民历史中,在其系统性的社会经济歧视历史中,在非洲和阿非利卡民族主义的兴起中,宗教,无论是作为排他性的契约神学,作为使命,还是作为社会福音,都有重要的话语和物质贡献。以以下三个关键辩论为例:第一个是关于“本土”机构/“本土教会和白人家长制”;二是关于古典教育和工业教育哪个更适合非洲人的争论;第三,关于基督教是否以及如何解决社会弊病的讨论。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Equality of Believers: Protestant Missionaries and the Racial Politics of South Africa
The Equality of Believers: Protestant Missionaries and the Racial Politics of South Africa. By Richard Elphick. Reconsiderations in Southern African History. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012. Pp. vii, 437; map, tables, bibliography, index. $40.00 cloth, $40.00 E-book.What would happen if you took the theme of religion and probed its impact on the history of racial discourse, racism, and race relations in South Africa? The result would be Richard Elphick's long-awaited and magisterial, The Equality of Believers. From the role of liberalism, nationalism, Christian universalism and humanism, and the emergence of independent African churches to the contours of segregation, industrialization, and apartheid, Elphick uses the theme of religion to revisit some of the major questions that have preoccupied historians of nineteenth- and twentieth-century South Africa. The book is divided into three parts, spanning eighteen chapters. The early chapters sketch broadly the protagonists and antagonists of pioneer evangelism, the cultural chauvinism of European missionaries, and the pressures of indigenization. Black and white interlocutors queried whether spiritual and social equality were indeed axiomatic. Afrikaners voted with their feet and issued deafening refutations of gelykstelling (equalization of races), yet even among those missionaries who answered a resounding "yes," few were ready to relinquish their paternalistic roles. Part two investigates the fusing of the lexicon of gelykstelling with the "Social Gospel," the "Native Question" and segregation, developments that signaled how secularization would come to influence racial and evangelical discourses. The tum-of-the-century and interwar periods witnessed new alliances between secular and missionary organizations and reinforced missionary roles in shaping the discourse on settler colonialism, empire, and missions.The final section shows how a sometimes vague, but malleable notion of segregation gave way to assaults on the Cape franchise and on African education inter alia, and led to a more clearly delineated and concrete plan to implement apartheid It cannot be overstated that the history of race relations in South Africa is neither synonymous with nor a prelude to the inexorable march to apartheid after 1948. The Equality of Believers thus provides a welcome reconsideration of the relationship between Afrikaner nationalism, Calvinism, neo-Calvinism, the missiology of the Dutch Reformed Church, and apartheid ideology. Elphick engages in a nuanced analysis of the divergent views that hounded liberal interpretations out of the DRC establishment as it evolved into a volkskerk, underwent the paroxysms of Afrikaner nationalism, and retooled segregation ideology (pp. 3, 50). The verdict is a stinging indictment of liberals who failed to come up with a robust vision for multiracial South Africa, or at least one that could counter the "strenuous" intellectual work of apartheid ideologues who blended history, neo-Calvinism, biblical exegesis, and fear to win over their supporters (pp. 256, 264, 272).Blending English, Afrikaans, (and German) sources and historiographies, Elphick thus makes a persuasive case for using religion as an analytical framework to elucidate larger questions about the relationship between missions and empire, and religion and apartheid; especially in relation to the more materialist concerns of recent historians. He shows that in South Africa's long colonial past, in its systemic history of socioeconomic discrimination, and in the rise of African and Afrikaner nationalism, religion, whether framed as exclusive covenant theology, as missions, or as the Social Gospel, had important discursive and material contributions to make. Take for example these three key debates: the first about "native" agency/ "native churches and white paternalism; the second, a row about whether a classical versus industrial education was more suitable for Africans; and third, the deliberations about whether and how Christianity should address societal ills. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信