《约翰·高尔特:文学、历史和社会的观察与猜想》,里贾纳·休伊特主编(书评)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Ainsley McIntosh
{"title":"《约翰·高尔特:文学、历史和社会的观察与猜想》,里贾纳·休伊特主编(书评)","authors":"Ainsley McIntosh","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-1929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike his literary contemporaries Walter Scott and James Hogg, who have enjoyed a substantial critical recovery in the late twentieth and early twenty¢rst centuries, John Galt has continued to su¡er from relative obscurity. This volume, containing ¢fteen wide-ranging essays by leading critics of Scottish Romantic literature, represents a landmark move towards redressing this critical imbalance by uncovering Galt’s unique and wide-ranging contribution to the literary terrain of his time and asserting his position as a writer of particular signi¢cance for ours. The collection’s subtitle is charged simultaneously with meaning in Scottish Enlightenment historiographical terms, and with interpretative signi¢cance for contemporary social theory, relative in both contexts to how social knowledge is constructed. It indicates that aspect of Galt’s ¢ctional achievement, ‘his ability to represent people acting in society’ (\" ), of greatest signi¢cance here, and the network of contingencies through which the volume’s contributors engage with his writing. The volume is organised into four topical thematic sections: ‘progress, memory, and communities’; ‘con£ict and consensus’; ‘justice and tolerance’; ‘identities and ethics’. These broad classi¢cations allow the scope of its discussion to move beyond the parameters of conventional literary criticism, so that Alyson Bardsley reads Ringan Gilhaize; or, The Covenanters within the context of trauma studies and Regina Hewitt draws upon social theory in her comparative analysis of Eben Erskine; or, The Traveller and selected works of Harriet Martineau. This arrangement facilitates both fresh readings of Galt’s most frequently discussed works, and the ¢rst sustained critiques of lesserstudied texts, including Rothelan, and the Travels and Observations of Hareach, the Wandering Jew. This interdisciplinary approach to Galt be¢ts so multifaceted a writer; and these essays celebrate the incredible diversity of Galt’s oeuvre, which includes experimental forays into the writing of novels, poetry, drama, short stories, sketches, tales, travelogues, biography, autobiography, dramatic criticism, children’s literature and political journalism. An awareness of how Galt exploits the potentialities of generic properties and narrative strategies to form conjectures about the dynamics of community-formation at the","PeriodicalId":40783,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Literary Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"121 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Galt: Observations and Conjectures on Literature, History, and Society ed. by Regina Hewitt (review)\",\"authors\":\"Ainsley McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-1929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unlike his literary contemporaries Walter Scott and James Hogg, who have enjoyed a substantial critical recovery in the late twentieth and early twenty¢rst centuries, John Galt has continued to su¡er from relative obscurity. This volume, containing ¢fteen wide-ranging essays by leading critics of Scottish Romantic literature, represents a landmark move towards redressing this critical imbalance by uncovering Galt’s unique and wide-ranging contribution to the literary terrain of his time and asserting his position as a writer of particular signi¢cance for ours. The collection’s subtitle is charged simultaneously with meaning in Scottish Enlightenment historiographical terms, and with interpretative signi¢cance for contemporary social theory, relative in both contexts to how social knowledge is constructed. It indicates that aspect of Galt’s ¢ctional achievement, ‘his ability to represent people acting in society’ (\\\" ), of greatest signi¢cance here, and the network of contingencies through which the volume’s contributors engage with his writing. The volume is organised into four topical thematic sections: ‘progress, memory, and communities’; ‘con£ict and consensus’; ‘justice and tolerance’; ‘identities and ethics’. These broad classi¢cations allow the scope of its discussion to move beyond the parameters of conventional literary criticism, so that Alyson Bardsley reads Ringan Gilhaize; or, The Covenanters within the context of trauma studies and Regina Hewitt draws upon social theory in her comparative analysis of Eben Erskine; or, The Traveller and selected works of Harriet Martineau. This arrangement facilitates both fresh readings of Galt’s most frequently discussed works, and the ¢rst sustained critiques of lesserstudied texts, including Rothelan, and the Travels and Observations of Hareach, the Wandering Jew. This interdisciplinary approach to Galt be¢ts so multifaceted a writer; and these essays celebrate the incredible diversity of Galt’s oeuvre, which includes experimental forays into the writing of novels, poetry, drama, short stories, sketches, tales, travelogues, biography, autobiography, dramatic criticism, children’s literature and political journalism. An awareness of how Galt exploits the potentialities of generic properties and narrative strategies to form conjectures about the dynamics of community-formation at the\",\"PeriodicalId\":40783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Literary Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Literary Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-1929\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Literary Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-1929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与同时代的沃尔特·斯科特和詹姆斯·霍格不同,约翰·高尔特在20世纪末和21世纪初的批评界获得了实质性的复苏,他一直从相对默默无闻中脱颖而出。这一卷,包含了15篇广泛的文章,由苏格兰浪漫主义文学的主要评论家,代表了一个里程碑式的举动,通过揭示高尔特的独特和广泛的贡献,他的时代的文学地形,并主张他的位置作为一个作家的特殊意义,为我们纠正这种关键的不平衡。这本书的副标题同时充满了苏格兰启蒙运动史学术语的含义,以及对当代社会理论的解释意义,相对于两种背景下社会知识是如何构建的。它表明了高尔特的功能成就的一个方面,“他代表人们在社会中行为的能力”(“),在这里是最重要的,以及该卷的贡献者参与他的写作的偶然网络。全书分为四个主题部分:“进步、记忆和社区”;“冲突与共识”;“正义与宽容”;"身份和道德"这些广泛的分类使得它的讨论范围超越了传统文学批评的范围,所以艾莉森·巴德斯利读了林根·吉尔海泽;或者,《契约》在创伤研究的背景下,雷吉娜·休伊特在对埃本·厄斯金的比较分析中借鉴了社会理论;或者《旅行者》和哈里特·马蒂诺作品选。这种安排既有利于高尔特最常讨论的作品的新鲜阅读,也有利于对较少研究的文本的第一次持续批评,包括罗特兰,以及流浪犹太人哈达奇的旅行和观察。这种跨学科的方法使高尔特成为一个多才多艺的作家;这些文章颂扬了高尔特作品的惊人多样性,包括小说、诗歌、戏剧、短篇小说、小品、故事、游记、传记、自传、戏剧评论、儿童文学和政治新闻等方面的实验性尝试。意识到Galt如何利用一般属性和叙事策略的潜力来形成关于社区形成动态的猜测
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
John Galt: Observations and Conjectures on Literature, History, and Society ed. by Regina Hewitt (review)
Unlike his literary contemporaries Walter Scott and James Hogg, who have enjoyed a substantial critical recovery in the late twentieth and early twenty¢rst centuries, John Galt has continued to su¡er from relative obscurity. This volume, containing ¢fteen wide-ranging essays by leading critics of Scottish Romantic literature, represents a landmark move towards redressing this critical imbalance by uncovering Galt’s unique and wide-ranging contribution to the literary terrain of his time and asserting his position as a writer of particular signi¢cance for ours. The collection’s subtitle is charged simultaneously with meaning in Scottish Enlightenment historiographical terms, and with interpretative signi¢cance for contemporary social theory, relative in both contexts to how social knowledge is constructed. It indicates that aspect of Galt’s ¢ctional achievement, ‘his ability to represent people acting in society’ (" ), of greatest signi¢cance here, and the network of contingencies through which the volume’s contributors engage with his writing. The volume is organised into four topical thematic sections: ‘progress, memory, and communities’; ‘con£ict and consensus’; ‘justice and tolerance’; ‘identities and ethics’. These broad classi¢cations allow the scope of its discussion to move beyond the parameters of conventional literary criticism, so that Alyson Bardsley reads Ringan Gilhaize; or, The Covenanters within the context of trauma studies and Regina Hewitt draws upon social theory in her comparative analysis of Eben Erskine; or, The Traveller and selected works of Harriet Martineau. This arrangement facilitates both fresh readings of Galt’s most frequently discussed works, and the ¢rst sustained critiques of lesserstudied texts, including Rothelan, and the Travels and Observations of Hareach, the Wandering Jew. This interdisciplinary approach to Galt be¢ts so multifaceted a writer; and these essays celebrate the incredible diversity of Galt’s oeuvre, which includes experimental forays into the writing of novels, poetry, drama, short stories, sketches, tales, travelogues, biography, autobiography, dramatic criticism, children’s literature and political journalism. An awareness of how Galt exploits the potentialities of generic properties and narrative strategies to form conjectures about the dynamics of community-formation at the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Literary Review
Scottish Literary Review LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信