二战后重塑童年

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
James Marten
{"title":"二战后重塑童年","authors":"James Marten","doi":"10.5860/choice.49-6482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinventing Childhood after World War II Paula S. Fass and Michael Grossberg, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. Contents, notes, index. 182 pp. $42.50 paper. ISBN: 9780812243673How many historians does it take to write an insightful, provocative, scholarly, and readable little book that will help stu- dents and historians alike understand the contexts in which the history and histo- riographies of children and youth have developed over the last half century? In this case, seven-the number who con- tributed to this model of purposeful collaboration that stakes a claim for the potential of history as a tool to explore and even influence public attitudes about and government policies toward children.If not quite seamless, the book is nevertheless tightly organized. Paula Fass focuses on the creation of a generation of anxious parents and children as more mothers went to work, divorce rates grew, schools worsened, and drugs became available to control child behaviors. Michael Grossberg explains how children's \"rights\" at first widened (the 1954 school desegregation decision, for instance) and then narrowed (due to censorship and worries about sexual predators). Steven Mintz explores the commercialization of children's culture and the growing belief that children's pastimes required less imagination than in the past (he also partly debunks that notion). Stephen Las- sonde argues that, while the first postwar generation grew up with clear coming- of-age markers, the commercialization of childhood, the increasing awareness of psychological and eating disorders, and the exposure to sex and violence all com- bined to \"compress\" childhood, even as other cultural trends have caused adults to extend their own childhoods. Mary Ann Mason examines the difficulty of fitting the notion of the \"best interests of the child\" into the constantly shifting defi- nitions of family with the emergence of surrogate motherhood, gay adoption, and other new or newly accepted technologies and concepts. Kriste Lindenmeyer suggests that the American Dream became differ- ent things for postwar children and their parents and led the federal government to build programs intended to level the play- ing field for all children. And Bengt Sandin offers a Swedish perspective in which chil- dren's rights became a dominant priority of the central government and children's lives became a state responsibility in ways that Americans could hardly imagine.One of the most important threads running through the essays is anxiety: Par- ents worried about giving their children too much or too little freedom; Govern- ment officials worried about creating a class of permanently dependent citizens; Cultural critics worried about child con- sumerism and about forcing (or allowing) children to grow up too fast; Traditional- ists worried about expanding construc- tions of families; And, for more than half the period covered by the book, everyone worried about the Soviet threat and its ramifications. …","PeriodicalId":45727,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Play","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinventing Childhood after World War II\",\"authors\":\"James Marten\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.49-6482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reinventing Childhood after World War II Paula S. Fass and Michael Grossberg, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. Contents, notes, index. 182 pp. $42.50 paper. ISBN: 9780812243673How many historians does it take to write an insightful, provocative, scholarly, and readable little book that will help stu- dents and historians alike understand the contexts in which the history and histo- riographies of children and youth have developed over the last half century? In this case, seven-the number who con- tributed to this model of purposeful collaboration that stakes a claim for the potential of history as a tool to explore and even influence public attitudes about and government policies toward children.If not quite seamless, the book is nevertheless tightly organized. Paula Fass focuses on the creation of a generation of anxious parents and children as more mothers went to work, divorce rates grew, schools worsened, and drugs became available to control child behaviors. Michael Grossberg explains how children's \\\"rights\\\" at first widened (the 1954 school desegregation decision, for instance) and then narrowed (due to censorship and worries about sexual predators). Steven Mintz explores the commercialization of children's culture and the growing belief that children's pastimes required less imagination than in the past (he also partly debunks that notion). Stephen Las- sonde argues that, while the first postwar generation grew up with clear coming- of-age markers, the commercialization of childhood, the increasing awareness of psychological and eating disorders, and the exposure to sex and violence all com- bined to \\\"compress\\\" childhood, even as other cultural trends have caused adults to extend their own childhoods. Mary Ann Mason examines the difficulty of fitting the notion of the \\\"best interests of the child\\\" into the constantly shifting defi- nitions of family with the emergence of surrogate motherhood, gay adoption, and other new or newly accepted technologies and concepts. Kriste Lindenmeyer suggests that the American Dream became differ- ent things for postwar children and their parents and led the federal government to build programs intended to level the play- ing field for all children. And Bengt Sandin offers a Swedish perspective in which chil- dren's rights became a dominant priority of the central government and children's lives became a state responsibility in ways that Americans could hardly imagine.One of the most important threads running through the essays is anxiety: Par- ents worried about giving their children too much or too little freedom; Govern- ment officials worried about creating a class of permanently dependent citizens; Cultural critics worried about child con- sumerism and about forcing (or allowing) children to grow up too fast; Traditional- ists worried about expanding construc- tions of families; And, for more than half the period covered by the book, everyone worried about the Soviet threat and its ramifications. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":45727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Play\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Play\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

《二战后重塑童年》保拉·s·法斯和迈克尔·格罗斯伯格编。费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2012。目录、注释、索引。182页,42.5美元。需要多少历史学家才能写出一本见解深刻、煽动性强、学术性强、可读性强的小书,帮助学生和历史学家理解过去半个世纪以来儿童和青少年的历史和史书的发展背景?在这种情况下,七人——为这种有目的的合作模式做出了贡献的人数,这种合作模式声称历史的潜力是一种探索甚至影响公众对儿童态度和政府对儿童政策的工具。这本书虽然算不上天衣无缝,但还是组织得很严密。Paula Fass关注的是随着越来越多的母亲去工作,离婚率上升,学校状况恶化,以及控制儿童行为的药物的出现,一代焦虑的父母和孩子的产生。迈克尔·格罗斯伯格解释了儿童的“权利”最初是如何扩大的(例如,1954年学校废除种族隔离的决定),然后又如何缩小(由于审查制度和对性侵犯者的担忧)。史蒂文·明茨(Steven Mintz)探讨了儿童文化的商业化,以及越来越多的人认为儿童的娱乐活动比过去更不需要想象力的观点(他也在一定程度上驳斥了这种观点)。斯蒂芬·拉斯桑德认为,虽然战后第一代在成长过程中带有明确的成年标志,但童年的商业化、对心理和饮食失调的日益关注、以及性和暴力的暴露,所有这些都“压缩”了童年,尽管其他文化趋势已经导致成年人延长了自己的童年。随着代孕母亲、同性恋收养和其他新的或新接受的技术和概念的出现,家庭的定义不断变化,玛丽·安·梅森审视了将“孩子的最大利益”这一概念融入其中的困难。Kriste Lindenmeyer认为美国梦对战后的孩子和他们的父母来说是不同的东西,并促使联邦政府制定了旨在为所有孩子创造公平竞争环境的计划。本格特·桑丁提供了一个瑞典的视角,在这个视角中,儿童权利成为中央政府的首要任务,儿童的生活成为国家的责任,这是美国人几乎无法想象的。贯穿这些文章的最重要的线索之一是焦虑:父母担心给孩子太多或太少的自由;政府官员担心会产生一个永久依赖他人的公民阶层;文化评论家担心儿童消费主义和强迫(或允许)儿童过快成长;传统主义者担心家庭结构的扩大;而且,在这本书所涵盖的一半以上的时间里,每个人都担心苏联的威胁及其后果。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinventing Childhood after World War II
Reinventing Childhood after World War II Paula S. Fass and Michael Grossberg, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. Contents, notes, index. 182 pp. $42.50 paper. ISBN: 9780812243673How many historians does it take to write an insightful, provocative, scholarly, and readable little book that will help stu- dents and historians alike understand the contexts in which the history and histo- riographies of children and youth have developed over the last half century? In this case, seven-the number who con- tributed to this model of purposeful collaboration that stakes a claim for the potential of history as a tool to explore and even influence public attitudes about and government policies toward children.If not quite seamless, the book is nevertheless tightly organized. Paula Fass focuses on the creation of a generation of anxious parents and children as more mothers went to work, divorce rates grew, schools worsened, and drugs became available to control child behaviors. Michael Grossberg explains how children's "rights" at first widened (the 1954 school desegregation decision, for instance) and then narrowed (due to censorship and worries about sexual predators). Steven Mintz explores the commercialization of children's culture and the growing belief that children's pastimes required less imagination than in the past (he also partly debunks that notion). Stephen Las- sonde argues that, while the first postwar generation grew up with clear coming- of-age markers, the commercialization of childhood, the increasing awareness of psychological and eating disorders, and the exposure to sex and violence all com- bined to "compress" childhood, even as other cultural trends have caused adults to extend their own childhoods. Mary Ann Mason examines the difficulty of fitting the notion of the "best interests of the child" into the constantly shifting defi- nitions of family with the emergence of surrogate motherhood, gay adoption, and other new or newly accepted technologies and concepts. Kriste Lindenmeyer suggests that the American Dream became differ- ent things for postwar children and their parents and led the federal government to build programs intended to level the play- ing field for all children. And Bengt Sandin offers a Swedish perspective in which chil- dren's rights became a dominant priority of the central government and children's lives became a state responsibility in ways that Americans could hardly imagine.One of the most important threads running through the essays is anxiety: Par- ents worried about giving their children too much or too little freedom; Govern- ment officials worried about creating a class of permanently dependent citizens; Cultural critics worried about child con- sumerism and about forcing (or allowing) children to grow up too fast; Traditional- ists worried about expanding construc- tions of families; And, for more than half the period covered by the book, everyone worried about the Soviet threat and its ramifications. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Play
American Journal of Play SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信