光学滑稽动作:肯·雅各布斯的电影

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Ken Eisenstein
{"title":"光学滑稽动作:肯·雅各布斯的电影","authors":"Ken Eisenstein","doi":"10.5860/choice.49-0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ON TIC | TIC ON OPTIC ANTICS: THE CINEMA OF KEN JACOBS You've probably heard that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. In the case of Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs (Edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and Paul Arthur, Oxford University Press, 20 1 1 ) feel free to do so. Donned by a portion of a wonderful 1967 photograph of Ken and Flo, taken by none other than Michael Snow, the front of this volume, edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and (posthumously) Paul Arthur, heralds intricate fascination, loudly! The image as it appears is nearly bisected by a post between a pair of windows. Ken, standing in front of them and on the right, with his head, shouldet, and chest in profile, holds out a mirror that stretches across to the other, better, half. Since that floating pane catches Flo's profil perdu (from her shoulder up), the left hand side belongs to her - doubly so, as a sliver of her arm anchors the bottom corner beside its reflection. Turn the book over, passing a spine of lintel and lace, and, thanks to designer Elsie Lyons' folding of Snow's original onto the back cover, find Flo's full visage alone, as if you stepped into Ken's mirror and circled round its feature. At Optic Antics' center (chapters 11 and 12 of 22) sits another Flo pair. In \"Flo Talks! \", a 2008 interview conducted by Amy Taubin, \"the producer of Ken Jacobs' cinema,\" as Taubin calls her, relates the struggles she had with her parents' attachment to the 'antiseptic'; the importance of Fred Astaire and Piet Mondrian to her life as person and painter; her experiences at RISD; meeting Ken in the summer of 1961; raising children and making art with him. This entry is preceded by \"Some Jacobs Family Photos,\" a set often specimens curated and captioned by Flo. One of them is the Snow shot that in altered form (slightly cropped and majorly redistributed) adorns the book's exterior. This repetition and reiteration, this double movement from surface to deep middle, this churning of inside out, captures a major strategy of Jacobs' technique. The dissection in Tom, Tom, The Piper's Son (1969, revised 1971), the shuffling in The Doctor's Dream (1978), the vibrating 'eternalisms' of the digital videos (1999- ) and the flickering ones of the Nervous System (1975-2000) and Nervous Magic Lantern (1990- ) performances, and the further ephemerality of 'the Apparition Theater of New York (1967-1982), all testify to the game that Jacobs continuously initiates: \"play is the confident abandonment and restoring of balance.\"1 Jacobs once referred to his stabilizer, the \"triumvirate of persons that supports\" him most crucially (mother Janice Rosenthal, who died at 27; painting teacher Hans Hofmann; \"collaborator\" Flo), as his \"tripod.\"2 Indeed, he does seem to be a threelegged creature. Unique associations with Millennium Film Workshop, Binghamton University, and the Collective for Living Cinema, as well as a career that straddles film, digital and theater, exemplify two other significant trios. That our initial Snow spread over three surfaces (ventral, vertebral, dorsal) rhymes with these facts and introduces a new one: Optic Antics' three editors (with an especial tie to the one since lost). In the final note, number 90, of her thorough three-part \"Introduction: Ken Jacobs - A HalfCentury of Cinema,\" Michele Pierson relates that Paul Arthur died six months after proposing this book to Oxford, and so follows the collection's only unaltered reprint: Arthur's 1997 Film Comment article \"Creating Spectacle From Dross: The Chimeric Cinema of Ken Jacobs.\" In addition to invoking Jacobs' fancifulness by alluding to his connections to a \"secret history of cinema,\" Arthur's overview of both the artist's aesthetic and its implementation in film and performance causes him to conclude that Jacobs' cinema, like the mythological beast, is 'mutant'. As a last look at the cover attests, Snow pictured a chimera too, triply dividing Ken's head on three grounds: hair on window; lips and chin on mirror; brow, nose, and philtrum on framing wood. …","PeriodicalId":44193,"journal":{"name":"MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs\",\"authors\":\"Ken Eisenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.49-0171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ON TIC | TIC ON OPTIC ANTICS: THE CINEMA OF KEN JACOBS You've probably heard that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. In the case of Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs (Edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and Paul Arthur, Oxford University Press, 20 1 1 ) feel free to do so. Donned by a portion of a wonderful 1967 photograph of Ken and Flo, taken by none other than Michael Snow, the front of this volume, edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and (posthumously) Paul Arthur, heralds intricate fascination, loudly! The image as it appears is nearly bisected by a post between a pair of windows. Ken, standing in front of them and on the right, with his head, shouldet, and chest in profile, holds out a mirror that stretches across to the other, better, half. Since that floating pane catches Flo's profil perdu (from her shoulder up), the left hand side belongs to her - doubly so, as a sliver of her arm anchors the bottom corner beside its reflection. Turn the book over, passing a spine of lintel and lace, and, thanks to designer Elsie Lyons' folding of Snow's original onto the back cover, find Flo's full visage alone, as if you stepped into Ken's mirror and circled round its feature. At Optic Antics' center (chapters 11 and 12 of 22) sits another Flo pair. In \\\"Flo Talks! \\\", a 2008 interview conducted by Amy Taubin, \\\"the producer of Ken Jacobs' cinema,\\\" as Taubin calls her, relates the struggles she had with her parents' attachment to the 'antiseptic'; the importance of Fred Astaire and Piet Mondrian to her life as person and painter; her experiences at RISD; meeting Ken in the summer of 1961; raising children and making art with him. This entry is preceded by \\\"Some Jacobs Family Photos,\\\" a set often specimens curated and captioned by Flo. One of them is the Snow shot that in altered form (slightly cropped and majorly redistributed) adorns the book's exterior. This repetition and reiteration, this double movement from surface to deep middle, this churning of inside out, captures a major strategy of Jacobs' technique. The dissection in Tom, Tom, The Piper's Son (1969, revised 1971), the shuffling in The Doctor's Dream (1978), the vibrating 'eternalisms' of the digital videos (1999- ) and the flickering ones of the Nervous System (1975-2000) and Nervous Magic Lantern (1990- ) performances, and the further ephemerality of 'the Apparition Theater of New York (1967-1982), all testify to the game that Jacobs continuously initiates: \\\"play is the confident abandonment and restoring of balance.\\\"1 Jacobs once referred to his stabilizer, the \\\"triumvirate of persons that supports\\\" him most crucially (mother Janice Rosenthal, who died at 27; painting teacher Hans Hofmann; \\\"collaborator\\\" Flo), as his \\\"tripod.\\\"2 Indeed, he does seem to be a threelegged creature. Unique associations with Millennium Film Workshop, Binghamton University, and the Collective for Living Cinema, as well as a career that straddles film, digital and theater, exemplify two other significant trios. That our initial Snow spread over three surfaces (ventral, vertebral, dorsal) rhymes with these facts and introduces a new one: Optic Antics' three editors (with an especial tie to the one since lost). In the final note, number 90, of her thorough three-part \\\"Introduction: Ken Jacobs - A HalfCentury of Cinema,\\\" Michele Pierson relates that Paul Arthur died six months after proposing this book to Oxford, and so follows the collection's only unaltered reprint: Arthur's 1997 Film Comment article \\\"Creating Spectacle From Dross: The Chimeric Cinema of Ken Jacobs.\\\" In addition to invoking Jacobs' fancifulness by alluding to his connections to a \\\"secret history of cinema,\\\" Arthur's overview of both the artist's aesthetic and its implementation in film and performance causes him to conclude that Jacobs' cinema, like the mythological beast, is 'mutant'. As a last look at the cover attests, Snow pictured a chimera too, triply dividing Ken's head on three grounds: hair on window; lips and chin on mirror; brow, nose, and philtrum on framing wood. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":44193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-0171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-0171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

你可能听说过“不能以貌取人”这句话。在《光学滑稽动作:肯·雅各布斯的电影》(米歇尔·皮尔森、大卫·e·詹姆斯和保罗·阿瑟主编,牛津大学出版社,2011年)一书中,你可以随意这样做。由迈克尔·斯诺(Michael Snow)于1967年拍摄的肯和弗洛(Ken and Flo)的一张精彩照片的一部分穿上,本卷的前部由米歇尔·皮尔森(Michele Pierson)、大卫·e·詹姆斯(David E. James)和(死后)保罗·亚瑟(Paul Arthur)编辑,大声地预示着复杂的魅力!这幅图像看起来几乎被一对窗户之间的柱子一分为二。肯恩,站在他们的前面,在右边,他的头,肩膀和胸部在侧面,伸出一面镜子,延伸到另一个,更好的,一半。因为那块浮动的玻璃捕捉到了弗洛的侧面(从她的肩膀以上),所以左手边是属于她的——加倍地,因为她的手臂的一小条固定在底部角落的倒影旁边。把书翻过来,经过门楣和蕾丝的书脊,多亏了设计师埃尔西·莱昂斯(Elsie Lyons)把斯诺的原作折叠在封底上,你会发现弗洛的全貌,就好像你走进了肯的镜子,绕着它的特征转了一圈。在光学滑稽的中心(22章中的第11章和第12章)坐着另一对Flo。在“Flo Talks!”2008年,艾米·陶宾(Amy Taubin)对她进行了一次采访,陶宾称她为“肯·雅各布斯(Ken Jacobs)电影的制片人”,她讲述了她与父母对“防腐剂”的依恋之间的斗争;弗雷德·阿斯泰尔和皮特·蒙德里安对她个人和画家生活的重要性;她在罗德岛设计学院的经历;在1961年夏天见到了肯;和他一起抚养孩子,一起创作艺术。这个条目的前面是“一些雅各布斯家庭照片”,这是一组由Flo策划和配文的标本。其中之一是雪的镜头,它以改变的形式(略有剪裁,主要是重新分发)装饰了这本书的外观。这种重复和重复,这种从表面到深层的双重运动,这种由内而外的搅动,抓住了雅各布斯技术的主要策略。《Tom, Tom, The Piper’s Son》(1969,修订于1971)中的解剖,《医生之梦》(1978)中的拖曳,数字视频(1999-)中振动的“永恒主义”,《神经系统》(1975-2000)和《神经魔灯》(1990-)表演中忽隐忽现的“永恒主义”,以及《纽约幻影剧场》(1967-1982)中进一步的短暂性,都证明了雅各布斯不断发起的游戏:“游戏是自信的放弃和恢复平衡。”雅各布斯曾提到他的稳定器,最重要的是支持他的“三人组”(母亲珍妮丝·罗森塔尔,27岁去世;绘画老师汉斯·霍夫曼;“合作者”弗洛),作为他的“三脚架”。的确,他看起来确实是一只三条腿的动物。与千禧电影工作室、宾厄姆顿大学和生活电影集体的独特联系,以及跨越电影、数字和戏剧的职业生涯,是另外两个重要的三重奏的例证。我们最初的Snow分布在三个表面(腹部,脊椎,背部)与这些事实一致,并引入了一个新的事实:Optic滑稽的三个编辑器(与后来丢失的那个特别相关)。米歇尔·皮尔森(Michele Pierson)在她的完整的三篇文章《导言:肯·雅各布斯——半个世纪的电影》(Introduction: Ken Jacobs - A half - century of Cinema)的最后一个注释(第90号)中提到,保罗·阿瑟(Paul Arthur)在向牛津大学提出这本书的六个月后去世了,因此,该书唯一未被修改的重印版是阿瑟1997年的电影评论文章《从糟心中创造奇迹:肯·雅各布斯的Chimeric Cinema》。除了通过暗示雅各布斯与“电影的秘密历史”的联系来唤起雅各布斯的幻想之外,亚瑟对艺术家的美学及其在电影和表演中的实施的概述使他得出结论,雅各布斯的电影,就像神话中的野兽一样,是“突变的”。最后看了一眼封面,斯诺也描绘了一个嵌合体,肯恩的头在三个方面被分成三部分:头发在窗户上;嘴唇和下巴对着镜子;额头、鼻子和中骨在框架木上。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs
ON TIC | TIC ON OPTIC ANTICS: THE CINEMA OF KEN JACOBS You've probably heard that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. In the case of Optic Antics: The Cinema of Ken Jacobs (Edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and Paul Arthur, Oxford University Press, 20 1 1 ) feel free to do so. Donned by a portion of a wonderful 1967 photograph of Ken and Flo, taken by none other than Michael Snow, the front of this volume, edited by Michele Pierson, David E. James, and (posthumously) Paul Arthur, heralds intricate fascination, loudly! The image as it appears is nearly bisected by a post between a pair of windows. Ken, standing in front of them and on the right, with his head, shouldet, and chest in profile, holds out a mirror that stretches across to the other, better, half. Since that floating pane catches Flo's profil perdu (from her shoulder up), the left hand side belongs to her - doubly so, as a sliver of her arm anchors the bottom corner beside its reflection. Turn the book over, passing a spine of lintel and lace, and, thanks to designer Elsie Lyons' folding of Snow's original onto the back cover, find Flo's full visage alone, as if you stepped into Ken's mirror and circled round its feature. At Optic Antics' center (chapters 11 and 12 of 22) sits another Flo pair. In "Flo Talks! ", a 2008 interview conducted by Amy Taubin, "the producer of Ken Jacobs' cinema," as Taubin calls her, relates the struggles she had with her parents' attachment to the 'antiseptic'; the importance of Fred Astaire and Piet Mondrian to her life as person and painter; her experiences at RISD; meeting Ken in the summer of 1961; raising children and making art with him. This entry is preceded by "Some Jacobs Family Photos," a set often specimens curated and captioned by Flo. One of them is the Snow shot that in altered form (slightly cropped and majorly redistributed) adorns the book's exterior. This repetition and reiteration, this double movement from surface to deep middle, this churning of inside out, captures a major strategy of Jacobs' technique. The dissection in Tom, Tom, The Piper's Son (1969, revised 1971), the shuffling in The Doctor's Dream (1978), the vibrating 'eternalisms' of the digital videos (1999- ) and the flickering ones of the Nervous System (1975-2000) and Nervous Magic Lantern (1990- ) performances, and the further ephemerality of 'the Apparition Theater of New York (1967-1982), all testify to the game that Jacobs continuously initiates: "play is the confident abandonment and restoring of balance."1 Jacobs once referred to his stabilizer, the "triumvirate of persons that supports" him most crucially (mother Janice Rosenthal, who died at 27; painting teacher Hans Hofmann; "collaborator" Flo), as his "tripod."2 Indeed, he does seem to be a threelegged creature. Unique associations with Millennium Film Workshop, Binghamton University, and the Collective for Living Cinema, as well as a career that straddles film, digital and theater, exemplify two other significant trios. That our initial Snow spread over three surfaces (ventral, vertebral, dorsal) rhymes with these facts and introduces a new one: Optic Antics' three editors (with an especial tie to the one since lost). In the final note, number 90, of her thorough three-part "Introduction: Ken Jacobs - A HalfCentury of Cinema," Michele Pierson relates that Paul Arthur died six months after proposing this book to Oxford, and so follows the collection's only unaltered reprint: Arthur's 1997 Film Comment article "Creating Spectacle From Dross: The Chimeric Cinema of Ken Jacobs." In addition to invoking Jacobs' fancifulness by alluding to his connections to a "secret history of cinema," Arthur's overview of both the artist's aesthetic and its implementation in film and performance causes him to conclude that Jacobs' cinema, like the mythological beast, is 'mutant'. As a last look at the cover attests, Snow pictured a chimera too, triply dividing Ken's head on three grounds: hair on window; lips and chin on mirror; brow, nose, and philtrum on framing wood. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL
MILLENNIUM FILM JOURNAL FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信