公平贸易、公司责任及其他:全球化正义的实验

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Elisabeth M. Riedl
{"title":"公平贸易、公司责任及其他:全球化正义的实验","authors":"Elisabeth M. Riedl","doi":"10.5860/choice.47-6960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fair Trade, Corporate Accountability and Beyond: Experiments in Globalizing Justice. Kate Macdonald and Shelley Marshall Ashgate, Farnham, 2010 This book, as the title suggests, tackles an emerging research agenda in identifying and examining 'experiments in globalizing justice'. It embarks on an ambitious agenda, seeking to critically examine distinct but also increasingly linked ethical initiatives like 'fair trade' and 'corporate social responsibility' (CSR), problematising the role and responsibilities of civil society, businesses, mobilised workers and the State within this discussion. These actors and initiatives, are subjected to a broad and challenging question: 'How can production and trade within transnational supply chains be governed effectively so as to protect core human and social rights and advance broader principles of justice within a global economy?' (p. 5). While this question risks being overly ambitious in scope and may overwhelm the reader initially, it is indeed pertinent for an examination of the promises and potential of initiatives such as CSR, which are gaining increasing leverage as market-based alternatives to broad-based structural change. In the context of proliferating social justice initiatives, spanning public and private, government and non-governmental actors, from corporate to civic led initiatives, to the domain of government regulation--the key question raised by the editors is a theoretical one--where should responsibility lie? The editors, Macdonald and Shelley (2010), develop and outline a conceptual framework for examining this question in the introductory chapter to this book. They use the metaphor of 'embedding' (drawing on the theoretical work of a range of scholars, notably Polanyi 1944) to frame the discussion and analysis of the ethical initiatives examined, with the argument that these serve as 'attempt(s) to re-embed capitalism in social justice norms' (p. 7). As such, the editors position these 'experiments in globalizing justice' at the interface between market imperatives and the social justice values that markets arguably reject (akin to Hayek's 1976 argument). Essentially, 're-embedding', for the editors, assumes that a process of 'dis-embedding' has occurred (a phenomenon traced to the rise of neoliberalism from the 1970s, p. 9). Some readers may question the stance taken by the editors and the literature they consult, as the process of dis-embedding which they refer to could, alternatively, reflect a contestation over social values rather than their expulsion. The conceptual framework of (dis)embedding raises two key tasks for the authors: to identify 'ethically defensible norms', by which standards capitalism should be regulated, and; to identify and evaluate the institutional arrangements which are necessary for a process of 're-embedding' to occur (p. 8). The admittedly 'hazy' 'yardstick' by which they seek to evaluate the capacity of the initiatives examined is through the concept of 'social justice' (p. 5). To add clarity to this concept, the authors derive 'norms of social justice' from relevant theoretical literature and public discourse. In examining the mix of actors and currently relatively ad hoc models for ethical change, the editors further seek to engage and contribute to scholarly discussions over regulation--particularly debates over the legitimacy of voluntary (or soft) over legal (or hard) mechanisms (p. …","PeriodicalId":43895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Australian Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair Trade, Corporate Accountability and Beyond: Experiments in Globalizing Justice\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth M. Riedl\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.47-6960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fair Trade, Corporate Accountability and Beyond: Experiments in Globalizing Justice. Kate Macdonald and Shelley Marshall Ashgate, Farnham, 2010 This book, as the title suggests, tackles an emerging research agenda in identifying and examining 'experiments in globalizing justice'. It embarks on an ambitious agenda, seeking to critically examine distinct but also increasingly linked ethical initiatives like 'fair trade' and 'corporate social responsibility' (CSR), problematising the role and responsibilities of civil society, businesses, mobilised workers and the State within this discussion. These actors and initiatives, are subjected to a broad and challenging question: 'How can production and trade within transnational supply chains be governed effectively so as to protect core human and social rights and advance broader principles of justice within a global economy?' (p. 5). While this question risks being overly ambitious in scope and may overwhelm the reader initially, it is indeed pertinent for an examination of the promises and potential of initiatives such as CSR, which are gaining increasing leverage as market-based alternatives to broad-based structural change. In the context of proliferating social justice initiatives, spanning public and private, government and non-governmental actors, from corporate to civic led initiatives, to the domain of government regulation--the key question raised by the editors is a theoretical one--where should responsibility lie? The editors, Macdonald and Shelley (2010), develop and outline a conceptual framework for examining this question in the introductory chapter to this book. They use the metaphor of 'embedding' (drawing on the theoretical work of a range of scholars, notably Polanyi 1944) to frame the discussion and analysis of the ethical initiatives examined, with the argument that these serve as 'attempt(s) to re-embed capitalism in social justice norms' (p. 7). As such, the editors position these 'experiments in globalizing justice' at the interface between market imperatives and the social justice values that markets arguably reject (akin to Hayek's 1976 argument). Essentially, 're-embedding', for the editors, assumes that a process of 'dis-embedding' has occurred (a phenomenon traced to the rise of neoliberalism from the 1970s, p. 9). Some readers may question the stance taken by the editors and the literature they consult, as the process of dis-embedding which they refer to could, alternatively, reflect a contestation over social values rather than their expulsion. The conceptual framework of (dis)embedding raises two key tasks for the authors: to identify 'ethically defensible norms', by which standards capitalism should be regulated, and; to identify and evaluate the institutional arrangements which are necessary for a process of 're-embedding' to occur (p. 8). The admittedly 'hazy' 'yardstick' by which they seek to evaluate the capacity of the initiatives examined is through the concept of 'social justice' (p. 5). To add clarity to this concept, the authors derive 'norms of social justice' from relevant theoretical literature and public discourse. In examining the mix of actors and currently relatively ad hoc models for ethical change, the editors further seek to engage and contribute to scholarly discussions over regulation--particularly debates over the legitimacy of voluntary (or soft) over legal (or hard) mechanisms (p. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":43895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Australian Political Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Australian Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-6960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Australian Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-6960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

公平贸易、公司责任及其他:全球化正义的实验。凯特·麦克唐纳和雪莱·马歇尔·阿什盖特,法纳姆,2010。正如书名所示,这本书处理了一个新兴的研究议程,即识别和检查“全球化正义的实验”。它开始了一项雄心勃勃的议程,试图批判性地审视不同但也日益联系在一起的道德倡议,如“公平贸易”和“企业社会责任”(CSR),并在讨论中提出民间社会、企业、动员工人和国家的作用和责任问题。这些行为者和倡议都面临着一个广泛而具有挑战性的问题:“如何有效地管理跨国供应链中的生产和贸易,以保护核心人权和社会权利,并在全球经济中推进更广泛的正义原则?”(第5页)。虽然这个问题的范围可能过于宏大,一开始可能会让读者不知所措,但它确实与审查企业社会责任等倡议的承诺和潜力有关,这些倡议作为基于市场的替代方案正在获得越来越大的影响力,而不是广泛的结构变革。在社会正义倡议激增的背景下,从公共和私人,政府和非政府行动者,从企业到公民主导的倡议,再到政府监管领域——编辑们提出的关键问题是一个理论问题——责任在哪里?编辑,麦克唐纳和雪莱(2010),开发和概述了一个概念框架来检查这个问题,在本书的介绍章节。他们使用“嵌入”的比喻(借鉴了一系列学者的理论工作,特别是波兰尼1944)来构建对所研究的伦理倡议的讨论和分析,并认为这些倡议是“试图将资本主义重新嵌入社会正义规范”(第7页)。因此,编辑们将这些“全球化正义的实验”定位于市场需求和市场可能拒绝的社会正义价值观之间的界面(类似于哈耶克1976年的论点)。从本质上讲,对于编辑来说,“重新嵌入”假设已经发生了“脱离嵌入”的过程(这种现象可以追溯到20世纪70年代新自由主义的兴起,第9页)。一些读者可能会质疑编辑和他们参考的文献所采取的立场,因为他们所指的脱离嵌入的过程可能反映了对社会价值观的争论,而不是对他们的驱逐。(反)嵌入的概念框架为作者提出了两个关键任务:确定“道德上可辩护的规范”,资本主义应该根据这些标准进行监管;识别和评估“重新嵌入”过程发生所必需的制度安排(第8页)。他们试图通过“社会正义”的概念来评估所研究的倡议的能力,公认的“模糊”“尺度”(第5页)。为了使这一概念更加清晰,作者从相关的理论文献和公共话语中得出“社会正义规范”。在研究参与者的组合和目前相对特设的道德变革模型时,编辑们进一步寻求参与并促进关于监管的学术讨论——特别是关于自愿(或软)机制相对于法律(或硬)机制的合法性的辩论(p. ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fair Trade, Corporate Accountability and Beyond: Experiments in Globalizing Justice
Fair Trade, Corporate Accountability and Beyond: Experiments in Globalizing Justice. Kate Macdonald and Shelley Marshall Ashgate, Farnham, 2010 This book, as the title suggests, tackles an emerging research agenda in identifying and examining 'experiments in globalizing justice'. It embarks on an ambitious agenda, seeking to critically examine distinct but also increasingly linked ethical initiatives like 'fair trade' and 'corporate social responsibility' (CSR), problematising the role and responsibilities of civil society, businesses, mobilised workers and the State within this discussion. These actors and initiatives, are subjected to a broad and challenging question: 'How can production and trade within transnational supply chains be governed effectively so as to protect core human and social rights and advance broader principles of justice within a global economy?' (p. 5). While this question risks being overly ambitious in scope and may overwhelm the reader initially, it is indeed pertinent for an examination of the promises and potential of initiatives such as CSR, which are gaining increasing leverage as market-based alternatives to broad-based structural change. In the context of proliferating social justice initiatives, spanning public and private, government and non-governmental actors, from corporate to civic led initiatives, to the domain of government regulation--the key question raised by the editors is a theoretical one--where should responsibility lie? The editors, Macdonald and Shelley (2010), develop and outline a conceptual framework for examining this question in the introductory chapter to this book. They use the metaphor of 'embedding' (drawing on the theoretical work of a range of scholars, notably Polanyi 1944) to frame the discussion and analysis of the ethical initiatives examined, with the argument that these serve as 'attempt(s) to re-embed capitalism in social justice norms' (p. 7). As such, the editors position these 'experiments in globalizing justice' at the interface between market imperatives and the social justice values that markets arguably reject (akin to Hayek's 1976 argument). Essentially, 're-embedding', for the editors, assumes that a process of 'dis-embedding' has occurred (a phenomenon traced to the rise of neoliberalism from the 1970s, p. 9). Some readers may question the stance taken by the editors and the literature they consult, as the process of dis-embedding which they refer to could, alternatively, reflect a contestation over social values rather than their expulsion. The conceptual framework of (dis)embedding raises two key tasks for the authors: to identify 'ethically defensible norms', by which standards capitalism should be regulated, and; to identify and evaluate the institutional arrangements which are necessary for a process of 're-embedding' to occur (p. 8). The admittedly 'hazy' 'yardstick' by which they seek to evaluate the capacity of the initiatives examined is through the concept of 'social justice' (p. 5). To add clarity to this concept, the authors derive 'norms of social justice' from relevant theoretical literature and public discourse. In examining the mix of actors and currently relatively ad hoc models for ethical change, the editors further seek to engage and contribute to scholarly discussions over regulation--particularly debates over the legitimacy of voluntary (or soft) over legal (or hard) mechanisms (p. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信