有机农业中亚麻荠基因型对霜霉病和杂草抑制的响应

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
V. Petcu, I. Toncea, Indira Galit, I. Radu, M. Grădilă, R. Cuculici
{"title":"有机农业中亚麻荠基因型对霜霉病和杂草抑制的响应","authors":"V. Petcu, I. Toncea, Indira Galit, I. Radu, M. Grădilă, R. Cuculici","doi":"10.59665/rar3923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz), has gained considerable attention in Europe as a potential oil seed feedstock for biofuels and bioproducts, although as cultivated surfaces it remains a marginal crop. As well in Romania progress has been made towards camelina’s yield potential but this under organic agriculture conditions has not been studied enough. Given this increased interest in camelina, six genotypes were compared to characterize camelina’s production potential in organic farming. Field experiments were conducted out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications, six genotypes in three growing seasons (2016-2019). Plant population, frequency (F%) of downy mildew attack, weeds infestation and yield were evaluated. The higher amount of spring rainfall (in 2017 and 2019) and cooler temperatures favoured a significant downy mildew plant infection, with some variations among genotypes. GP 202 proved to be most sensitive to downy mildew attack followed by Lena. The most resistant genotype was Calena, which recorded, for the three different years, the lowest degree of attack. In weeds suppression the variation due to year was higher than that due to the genotype and interactions of the factors. Results identify, in relation to climatic conditions, the most suitable genotypes for the tested environment, in terms of resistance to downy mildew and weed infestation. Calena, Camelia and Lindo genotypes were more less affected by downy mildew, weed infestation was less and the yield was higher as compared to the other genotypes studied.","PeriodicalId":49589,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Agricultural Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Camelina Sativa Genotypes Response to Downy Mildew and Weed Suppression in Organic Agriculture\",\"authors\":\"V. Petcu, I. Toncea, Indira Galit, I. Radu, M. Grădilă, R. Cuculici\",\"doi\":\"10.59665/rar3923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz), has gained considerable attention in Europe as a potential oil seed feedstock for biofuels and bioproducts, although as cultivated surfaces it remains a marginal crop. As well in Romania progress has been made towards camelina’s yield potential but this under organic agriculture conditions has not been studied enough. Given this increased interest in camelina, six genotypes were compared to characterize camelina’s production potential in organic farming. Field experiments were conducted out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications, six genotypes in three growing seasons (2016-2019). Plant population, frequency (F%) of downy mildew attack, weeds infestation and yield were evaluated. The higher amount of spring rainfall (in 2017 and 2019) and cooler temperatures favoured a significant downy mildew plant infection, with some variations among genotypes. GP 202 proved to be most sensitive to downy mildew attack followed by Lena. The most resistant genotype was Calena, which recorded, for the three different years, the lowest degree of attack. In weeds suppression the variation due to year was higher than that due to the genotype and interactions of the factors. Results identify, in relation to climatic conditions, the most suitable genotypes for the tested environment, in terms of resistance to downy mildew and weed infestation. Calena, Camelia and Lindo genotypes were more less affected by downy mildew, weed infestation was less and the yield was higher as compared to the other genotypes studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59665/rar3923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59665/rar3923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚麻荠(Camelina sativa L. Crantz),作为生物燃料和生物产品的潜在油籽原料,在欧洲引起了相当大的关注,尽管它仍然是一种边缘作物。在罗马尼亚,亚麻荠的产量潜力也取得了进展,但在有机农业条件下,这方面的研究还不够。鉴于人们对亚麻荠的兴趣日益增加,对6种基因型进行了比较,以表征亚麻荠在有机农业中的生产潜力。田间试验采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD), 4个重复,6个基因型,3个生长季节(2016-2019)。评价了植物种群、霜霉病发生频率(F%)、杂草侵染情况和产量。春季降水较多(2017年和2019年)和气温较低有利于霜霉病植物感染,基因型之间存在一些差异。GP 202被证明对霜霉病最敏感,其次是Lena。最具抗性的基因型是Calena,它在不同的三年里记录了最低的攻击程度。在杂草抑制中,因年份引起的变异大于因基因型和相互作用引起的变异。结果确定了与气候条件相关的最适合测试环境的基因型,即抗霜霉病和杂草侵害的基因型。Calena、Camelia和Lindo基因型受霜霉病的影响较小,杂草侵染较少,产量较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Camelina Sativa Genotypes Response to Downy Mildew and Weed Suppression in Organic Agriculture
Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz), has gained considerable attention in Europe as a potential oil seed feedstock for biofuels and bioproducts, although as cultivated surfaces it remains a marginal crop. As well in Romania progress has been made towards camelina’s yield potential but this under organic agriculture conditions has not been studied enough. Given this increased interest in camelina, six genotypes were compared to characterize camelina’s production potential in organic farming. Field experiments were conducted out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications, six genotypes in three growing seasons (2016-2019). Plant population, frequency (F%) of downy mildew attack, weeds infestation and yield were evaluated. The higher amount of spring rainfall (in 2017 and 2019) and cooler temperatures favoured a significant downy mildew plant infection, with some variations among genotypes. GP 202 proved to be most sensitive to downy mildew attack followed by Lena. The most resistant genotype was Calena, which recorded, for the three different years, the lowest degree of attack. In weeds suppression the variation due to year was higher than that due to the genotype and interactions of the factors. Results identify, in relation to climatic conditions, the most suitable genotypes for the tested environment, in terms of resistance to downy mildew and weed infestation. Calena, Camelia and Lindo genotypes were more less affected by downy mildew, weed infestation was less and the yield was higher as compared to the other genotypes studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Romanian Agricultural Research
Romanian Agricultural Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH is an “open access” one, which publishes original articles, short communications, presenting new scientific results – theoretical, experimental and technical – on plant breeding and genetics, physiology, biotechnology, mineral nutrition and plant protection, in field crops. Reviews on up-to date subjects and recent research, preferably from Eastern Europe, may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信