非核心家庭:阶级、性别和关怀网络

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Joya Misra
{"title":"非核心家庭:阶级、性别和关怀网络","authors":"Joya Misra","doi":"10.5860/choice.43-1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care. Karen V. Hansen. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005. 261 pp. ISBN 0-8135-3501-8. $62.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper). In Not-So-Nuclear Families, Karen Hansen challenges the idea that Americans are individualistic, relying only upon themselves and their nuclear families. She beautifully illustrates the webs of interdependence that bind us together, analyzing the networks working parents develop to help in caring for their school-age children. The book makes a masterful contribution to the literature-her qualitative and indepth portraits should have a deep resonance for everyone studying and/or engaged in caring for others. Hansen begins the book with a puzzle: If more women are employed, if both men and women are working longer hours, and if there are no new structural supports in the shape of workplace or state policies to support working families-who is caring for school-age children, given the disparity between school and work hours? Hansen answers this question through a convincing in-depth analysis of how families at four different class levels address the care gap, drawing attention to the important role that kin and friends play in providing \"networks of care.\" Hansen's research design is meant to untangle the relationship class plays in shaping networks providing care. She starts with four network \"anchors\" (or parents of school-age children) at four different class levels-working class, middle class, professional middle class, and upper class-focusing on White families to avoid making comparisons across both race and class. She interviews a list of people that the anchor identifies as helping rear her or their children, including grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbors, friends, babysitters, and nannies. This approach allows for multiple contacts with the network over time, while also triangulating the data because each member provides a different perspective on the same network. In the first major section of the book, four chapters profile each network and provide the details about how each anchor draws upon the help of networks. In the second section, Hansen analyzes particular issues in more depth. She explores the way anchors screen and recruit people into their networks, considers the reciprocity in their relationships that is necessary for these networks to exist, and analyzes the way men participate in these networks and the gendered implications of this care. Overall, the book makes a powerful statement about interdependence and the impact of both structure and agency in constructing networks of care. In three cases, the networks appear fairly vital; in the fourth, the network is unable to effectively handle the demands for care. …","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"7 1","pages":"783"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"86","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care\",\"authors\":\"Joya Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.43-1891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care. Karen V. Hansen. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005. 261 pp. ISBN 0-8135-3501-8. $62.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper). In Not-So-Nuclear Families, Karen Hansen challenges the idea that Americans are individualistic, relying only upon themselves and their nuclear families. She beautifully illustrates the webs of interdependence that bind us together, analyzing the networks working parents develop to help in caring for their school-age children. The book makes a masterful contribution to the literature-her qualitative and indepth portraits should have a deep resonance for everyone studying and/or engaged in caring for others. Hansen begins the book with a puzzle: If more women are employed, if both men and women are working longer hours, and if there are no new structural supports in the shape of workplace or state policies to support working families-who is caring for school-age children, given the disparity between school and work hours? Hansen answers this question through a convincing in-depth analysis of how families at four different class levels address the care gap, drawing attention to the important role that kin and friends play in providing \\\"networks of care.\\\" Hansen's research design is meant to untangle the relationship class plays in shaping networks providing care. She starts with four network \\\"anchors\\\" (or parents of school-age children) at four different class levels-working class, middle class, professional middle class, and upper class-focusing on White families to avoid making comparisons across both race and class. She interviews a list of people that the anchor identifies as helping rear her or their children, including grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbors, friends, babysitters, and nannies. This approach allows for multiple contacts with the network over time, while also triangulating the data because each member provides a different perspective on the same network. In the first major section of the book, four chapters profile each network and provide the details about how each anchor draws upon the help of networks. In the second section, Hansen analyzes particular issues in more depth. She explores the way anchors screen and recruit people into their networks, considers the reciprocity in their relationships that is necessary for these networks to exist, and analyzes the way men participate in these networks and the gendered implications of this care. Overall, the book makes a powerful statement about interdependence and the impact of both structure and agency in constructing networks of care. In three cases, the networks appear fairly vital; in the fourth, the network is unable to effectively handle the demands for care. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":48440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"86\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1891\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

摘要

非核心家庭:阶级、性别和关怀网络。凯伦·v·汉森。New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005。261页,ISBN 0-8135-3501-8。62.00美元(布);22.95美元(纸)。在《不那么核心的家庭》一书中,卡伦·汉森挑战了美国人个人主义、只依赖自己和核心家庭的观点。她很好地阐释了将我们联系在一起的相互依赖的网络,分析了职场父母为帮助照顾学龄儿童而建立的网络。这本书对文学做出了杰出的贡献——她的定性和深度的肖像应该会对每个研究和/或从事关心他人的人产生深刻的共鸣。汉森在书的开头提出了一个难题:如果有更多的女性受雇,如果男性和女性的工作时间都更长,如果没有新的结构性支持,比如工作场所或国家政策来支持工薪家庭——那么,鉴于上学和工作时间的差异,谁来照顾学龄儿童呢?汉森通过对四个不同阶层的家庭如何解决护理差距的令人信服的深入分析,回答了这个问题,并将人们的注意力吸引到亲属和朋友在提供“护理网络”方面所起的重要作用上。汉森的研究设计旨在理清关系阶层在形成提供护理的网络中的作用。她从四个不同阶层的网络“主播”(或学龄儿童的父母)开始——工人阶级、中产阶级、职业中产阶级和上层阶级——重点关注白人家庭,以避免种族和阶级之间的比较。她采访了一系列主持人认为帮助抚养她或他们孩子的人,包括祖父母、阿姨、叔叔、邻居、朋友、保姆和保姆。这种方法允许随着时间的推移与网络进行多次接触,同时还可以对数据进行三角测量,因为每个成员在同一网络上提供不同的视角。在本书的第一个主要部分,四章概述了每个网络,并提供了关于每个锚如何利用网络的帮助的细节。在第二部分中,Hansen更深入地分析了具体问题。她探索了主播筛选和招募人们进入他们的网络的方式,考虑了他们关系中的互惠性,这是这些网络存在所必需的,并分析了男性参与这些网络的方式以及这种照顾的性别含义。总的来说,这本书对相互依赖以及结构和机构在构建护理网络中的影响做出了强有力的陈述。在三个案例中,网络显得相当重要;第四,网络无法有效处理护理需求。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care
Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care. Karen V. Hansen. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005. 261 pp. ISBN 0-8135-3501-8. $62.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper). In Not-So-Nuclear Families, Karen Hansen challenges the idea that Americans are individualistic, relying only upon themselves and their nuclear families. She beautifully illustrates the webs of interdependence that bind us together, analyzing the networks working parents develop to help in caring for their school-age children. The book makes a masterful contribution to the literature-her qualitative and indepth portraits should have a deep resonance for everyone studying and/or engaged in caring for others. Hansen begins the book with a puzzle: If more women are employed, if both men and women are working longer hours, and if there are no new structural supports in the shape of workplace or state policies to support working families-who is caring for school-age children, given the disparity between school and work hours? Hansen answers this question through a convincing in-depth analysis of how families at four different class levels address the care gap, drawing attention to the important role that kin and friends play in providing "networks of care." Hansen's research design is meant to untangle the relationship class plays in shaping networks providing care. She starts with four network "anchors" (or parents of school-age children) at four different class levels-working class, middle class, professional middle class, and upper class-focusing on White families to avoid making comparisons across both race and class. She interviews a list of people that the anchor identifies as helping rear her or their children, including grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbors, friends, babysitters, and nannies. This approach allows for multiple contacts with the network over time, while also triangulating the data because each member provides a different perspective on the same network. In the first major section of the book, four chapters profile each network and provide the details about how each anchor draws upon the help of networks. In the second section, Hansen analyzes particular issues in more depth. She explores the way anchors screen and recruit people into their networks, considers the reciprocity in their relationships that is necessary for these networks to exist, and analyzes the way men participate in these networks and the gendered implications of this care. Overall, the book makes a powerful statement about interdependence and the impact of both structure and agency in constructing networks of care. In three cases, the networks appear fairly vital; in the fourth, the network is unable to effectively handle the demands for care. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信